Walmart sued in Philly in sale of ammo used in killings
Source: Philadelphia Inquirer
Robert Jourdain had been drinking for hours before he walked into a Walmart store early in the morning of July 5 and bought a box of .38-caliber ammunition, court papers say.
Shortly before 3 a.m., Jourdain, then 20, left the Northampton Crossings shopping center in Lower Nazareth Township and got into the white Mercedes Benz sport utility vehicle where Todd West was waiting with a Smith & Wesson revolver. Within an hour, West allegedly used the bullets to kill three people in a random shooting spree on the streets of Easton and Allentown.
The victims' families have filed a lawsuit in Philadelphia against Walmart that one expert says could succeed despite federal protections for gun and ammo dealers. The families claim Walmart and its employees were negligent in selling the ammunition to Jourdain because they should have known he was too young to buy it legally and was mentally impaired by alcohol.
"The bottom line here is that Walmart sold .38-caliber handgun ammunition to an underage person in the middle of the night, and that ammunition was used to kill several people," said Philadelphia attorney Matt Casey, who filed the suit last week.
Read more: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20160108_Walmart_sued_in_Philly_for_selling_ammo_used_in_killings.html
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)if they sold to an underage person that was drunk. Sounds like they are not protected as it was not a legal sale of the legal product. That is quite unlike we are always told that they have full immunity and can't be sued. Glad you agree and post that they actually can be, thanks.
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)lawsuit Tracy Morgan filed against them.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)it might be a start.
Tab
(11,093 posts)I say, stop selling the ammo.
hack89
(39,171 posts)defacto bans are unconstitutional.
Tab
(11,093 posts)Is it a "well-regulated militia"? 'Cause I'm not proposing the military or police have this restriction.
hack89
(39,171 posts)according to the Supreme Court, Democratic Party, President Obama (and, I assume, Bernie and Hillary).
Your question has been answered - it is settled law.
Tab
(11,093 posts)If anywhere, sadly.
Our precious "right" is killing us off and distilling fear and is taking our country backwards. IMHO.
hack89
(39,171 posts)AWBs, registration, magazine size limits are all perfectly legal.
Stop using the 2A as an excuse. The problem gun control advocates face is that there is not deep, widespread public support for the strict gun control laws they want.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)lovers have no solution to offer and only excuses and insults to hurl (better than bullets I guess) .
hack89
(39,171 posts)at least in my case (even though I do not love my guns). I support most gun control with only two exceptions - AWBs and registration.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)I call it the "it's a good start" problem. Good example is Washington State. They passed a universal background check law. The very first thing out of the mouths of its advocates was "it's a good start. We plan to introduce even stricter gun control measures soon."
If your ultimate goal is perceived as banning guns or severely restricting access then why do you expect gun owners to give you one iota of support?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)The hundreds of posts by DU members that own firearms. I am the same as hack, no AWB and registration I am open to anything else. As for insults, look at the daily insults directed our way, let's see, gun humper, ammosexual for just a couple.
beevul
(12,194 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,748 posts)It's apparently where the closest PA Common Pleas (state) court is.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,012 posts)If only if only
7962
(11,841 posts)But if you're supposed to check ID, then they screwed up on this one
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)They'll claim they had policies against such things (which I'm sure is true), and that they can't be responsible for the employee breaking their rules and the law. Hopefully, that strategy will fail. If they paid those people a living wage, don't you suppose they'd be more inclined to do their job right?