Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 11:53 PM Jan 2016

Walmart sued in Philly in sale of ammo used in killings

Source: Philadelphia Inquirer

Robert Jourdain had been drinking for hours before he walked into a Walmart store early in the morning of July 5 and bought a box of .38-caliber ammunition, court papers say.

Shortly before 3 a.m., Jourdain, then 20, left the Northampton Crossings shopping center in Lower Nazareth Township and got into the white Mercedes Benz sport utility vehicle where Todd West was waiting with a Smith & Wesson revolver. Within an hour, West allegedly used the bullets to kill three people in a random shooting spree on the streets of Easton and Allentown.

The victims' families have filed a lawsuit in Philadelphia against Walmart that one expert says could succeed despite federal protections for gun and ammo dealers. The families claim Walmart and its employees were negligent in selling the ammunition to Jourdain because they should have known he was too young to buy it legally and was mentally impaired by alcohol.

"The bottom line here is that Walmart sold .38-caliber handgun ammunition to an underage person in the middle of the night, and that ammunition was used to kill several people," said Philadelphia attorney Matt Casey, who filed the suit last week.

Read more: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20160108_Walmart_sued_in_Philly_for_selling_ammo_used_in_killings.html

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Walmart sued in Philly in sale of ammo used in killings (Original Post) onehandle Jan 2016 OP
sounds like they are liable Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #1
Ya but I suspect that this will be settled out of court just like Walmart settled the cstanleytech Jan 2016 #15
I hope they win this case, passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #2
Guns are useless without ammo Tab Jan 2016 #3
+100000 trillion Jan 2016 #5
Ammo is protected by the 2A. hack89 Jan 2016 #8
Then we're back to what the definition of constitutional is Tab Jan 2016 #9
The 2A protects an individual right to keep and bear arms (including ammo) hack89 Jan 2016 #10
I view it as a misreading of the constitution. That said, it won't be fought here. Tab Jan 2016 #11
The 2A allows strict regulation of guns hack89 Jan 2016 #13
i thought our problem was watching innocent people get slaughtered by guns and having alot of gun MariaThinks Jan 2016 #14
And you would be wrong. hack89 Jan 2016 #16
you understand that this is not about YOU but a wider sample MariaThinks Jan 2016 #17
There is no trust between the two sides. hack89 Jan 2016 #19
I guess you have not read Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #20
The president gets it even if you don't. beevul Jan 2016 #12
As a note - neither the sale nor the shooting spree happened IN or near Philly. BumRushDaShow Jan 2016 #4
K&R FailureToCommunicate Jan 2016 #6
Wal Mart near me wont sell ammo after 11pm. 7962 Jan 2016 #7
good. they are liable MariaThinks Jan 2016 #18
They'll try and throw the clerk under the bus. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #21
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
1. sounds like they are liable
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 12:05 AM
Jan 2016

if they sold to an underage person that was drunk. Sounds like they are not protected as it was not a legal sale of the legal product. That is quite unlike we are always told that they have full immunity and can't be sued. Glad you agree and post that they actually can be, thanks.

cstanleytech

(26,280 posts)
15. Ya but I suspect that this will be settled out of court just like Walmart settled the
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 03:11 PM
Jan 2016

lawsuit Tracy Morgan filed against them.

Tab

(11,093 posts)
9. Then we're back to what the definition of constitutional is
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 12:27 PM
Jan 2016

Is it a "well-regulated militia"? 'Cause I'm not proposing the military or police have this restriction.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
10. The 2A protects an individual right to keep and bear arms (including ammo)
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:25 PM
Jan 2016

according to the Supreme Court, Democratic Party, President Obama (and, I assume, Bernie and Hillary).

Your question has been answered - it is settled law.

Tab

(11,093 posts)
11. I view it as a misreading of the constitution. That said, it won't be fought here.
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:29 PM
Jan 2016

If anywhere, sadly.

Our precious "right" is killing us off and distilling fear and is taking our country backwards. IMHO.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
13. The 2A allows strict regulation of guns
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:32 PM
Jan 2016

AWBs, registration, magazine size limits are all perfectly legal.

Stop using the 2A as an excuse. The problem gun control advocates face is that there is not deep, widespread public support for the strict gun control laws they want.

MariaThinks

(2,495 posts)
14. i thought our problem was watching innocent people get slaughtered by guns and having alot of gun
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 02:45 PM
Jan 2016

lovers have no solution to offer and only excuses and insults to hurl (better than bullets I guess) .

hack89

(39,171 posts)
16. And you would be wrong.
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 03:19 PM
Jan 2016

at least in my case (even though I do not love my guns). I support most gun control with only two exceptions - AWBs and registration.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
19. There is no trust between the two sides.
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 04:26 PM
Jan 2016

I call it the "it's a good start" problem. Good example is Washington State. They passed a universal background check law. The very first thing out of the mouths of its advocates was "it's a good start. We plan to introduce even stricter gun control measures soon."

If your ultimate goal is perceived as banning guns or severely restricting access then why do you expect gun owners to give you one iota of support?

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
20. I guess you have not read
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 06:29 PM
Jan 2016

The hundreds of posts by DU members that own firearms. I am the same as hack, no AWB and registration I am open to anything else. As for insults, look at the daily insults directed our way, let's see, gun humper, ammosexual for just a couple.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
12. The president gets it even if you don't.
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:29 PM
Jan 2016
Now, I want to be absolutely clear at the start -- and I’ve said this over and over again, this also becomes routine, there is a ritual about this whole thing that I have to do -- I believe in the Second Amendment. It’s there written on the paper. It guarantees a right to bear arms. No matter how many times people try to twist my words around -- I taught constitutional law, I know a little about this -- (applause) -- I get it.


BumRushDaShow

(128,748 posts)
4. As a note - neither the sale nor the shooting spree happened IN or near Philly.
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 06:41 AM
Jan 2016

It's apparently where the closest PA Common Pleas (state) court is.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
7. Wal Mart near me wont sell ammo after 11pm.
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 09:00 AM
Jan 2016

But if you're supposed to check ID, then they screwed up on this one

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
21. They'll try and throw the clerk under the bus.
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 06:44 PM
Jan 2016

They'll claim they had policies against such things (which I'm sure is true), and that they can't be responsible for the employee breaking their rules and the law. Hopefully, that strategy will fail. If they paid those people a living wage, don't you suppose they'd be more inclined to do their job right?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Walmart sued in Philly in...