Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:31 AM Jan 2016

BREAKING: Lottery officials say there was NO winner in tonight's Powerball

Last edited Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:02 AM - Edit history (2)

Source: CNBC

BREAKING: Lottery officials say there was NO winner in tonight's Powerball, jackpot now at record $1,300,000,000




Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/10/no-winner-for-the-900m-powerball-jackpot-wednesdays-draw-worth-13b.html




Here we go again.... (and no, I didn't buy a ticket... was waiting for it to go over a billion)






72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: Lottery officials say there was NO winner in tonight's Powerball (Original Post) tomm2thumbs Jan 2016 OP
Unbelievable. I didn't even check my tickets yet. yeoman6987 Jan 2016 #1
I bought 1 - won $4.00 840high Jan 2016 #12
baby needs a new pair of shoes.... n/t Dr. Xavier Jan 2016 #2
I smell a rat. Sam_Fields Jan 2016 #3
with connections tomm2thumbs Jan 2016 #4
Why not make 1,300 millionaires instead? I don't get it. Freelancer Jan 2016 #5
That's not the American way.. padfun Jan 2016 #6
I was hoping there'd have been 1000 winning tickets rpannier Jan 2016 #7
The odds of winning... philosslayer Jan 2016 #8
LOL. Very true. But... Freelancer Jan 2016 #14
Very COOL story!!!! It sort of gives one hope...... onecent Jan 2016 #27
Or I could put the money in a church collection plate JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2016 #29
AKA: "Serendipity". AKA: "There are more thngs in heaven and hell than KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #31
Because every record-breaking jackpot means record-breaking profits William Seger Jan 2016 #13
The odds used to be better. gvstn Jan 2016 #23
Explain how that would work... brooklynite Jan 2016 #42
That's a great idea! smirkymonkey Jan 2016 #48
Wow, not only do you want to only give them one million, you want it BEFORE taxes Reter Jan 2016 #55
There are other drawings with better odds TexasBushwhacker Jan 2016 #72
odds of winning: 1/292,000,000. Come one Americans bad at math. . .the lottery needs your Feeling the Bern Jan 2016 #9
Okay, so explain the math, smart guy jberryhill Jan 2016 #51
if only one ticket could have the correct numbers is would be about $4 EV for every $1, but kelly1mm Jan 2016 #59
Good answer jberryhill Jan 2016 #60
Realistically, it never gets positive William Seger Jan 2016 #64
It's $2 per ticket now, so half that (n/t) William Seger Jan 2016 #62
Correct! Thanks! nt! kelly1mm Jan 2016 #63
People who play the lottery aren't bad at math. kentauros Jan 2016 #69
Zero said it best. edbermac Jan 2016 #10
...Sorry Folks! Joe Shlabotnik Jan 2016 #11
Theres still a chance! DJ13 Jan 2016 #16
Yeah PCH they really got me going - LiberalElite Jan 2016 #30
LOL - There really should be a rule denying you internet access during morning coffee hour! - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #32
?? why ?? nt LiberalElite Jan 2016 #34
I had a mouthful of coffee when reading your initial post. Very painful ejection KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #37
Oh. Yeah. LiberalElite Jan 2016 #39
Your emoticons add a certain je ne sais quoi to the humor. Bravo! - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #40
THAT part LiberalElite Jan 2016 #41
A billion three? Guess it's time to drive to Cali from Vegas. brush Jan 2016 #15
Thats a gross amount of money for one person to win. Duckfan Jan 2016 #17
Wow, that's more money than most people need... n/t Little Tich Jan 2016 #18
Holy crap, on the one hand. On the other hand, this is starting to smell. merrily Jan 2016 #19
It was done quite openly to increase profits William Seger Jan 2016 #22
Thank you. I guessed correctly about the intentional nature, wrong about the smell. merrily Jan 2016 #24
Since it's gambling, I'd go with 'wash' and let yourself off the hook! :) - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #33
Thanks. I'm in such a great mood this morning, I am going to agree with you. merrily Jan 2016 #36
It'll hit $1.5 billion before it's all said and done. joshcryer Jan 2016 #20
Not true. Look at how many people just got a little education in statistics. n/t jtuck004 Jan 2016 #21
A little learning is a dangerous thing ~Alexander Pope - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #35
That was from his book about how inadequate his critic's education was to the task of jtuck004 Jan 2016 #53
Tecnically, it was from his long poem "An Essay on Criticism." Back then, the KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #54
It has always reminded me of the viewpoint of the privileged, industrialists or plantation owners jtuck004 Jan 2016 #70
I can only say this about that: joshdawg Jan 2016 #25
"Get your tickets here... beyondbeyond Jan 2016 #26
I've already beat 290,000,000 to One odds Uben Jan 2016 #28
Real gamblers would say that was the beginning of a 'hot streak' and you should KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #38
Another round rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #43
2 bucks to dream for a couple days Marrah_G Jan 2016 #45
And that's what it is. Igel Jan 2016 #49
wooo 4 bucks! lol Marrah_G Jan 2016 #44
Good comparison to corporate welfare? Marthe48 Jan 2016 #46
I read that 25 tickets matched five numbers for a $1 million... Tom_Foolery Jan 2016 #47
We had a $2M winner in a small town near Houston TexasBushwhacker Jan 2016 #67
Who needs to win the big one? That's a nice hunk of change. Tom_Foolery Jan 2016 #68
Slow news day? NastyRiffraff Jan 2016 #50
just think... handmade34 Jan 2016 #52
Well considering I have more chance of getting struck by lightening .. I still bought a ticket. YOHABLO Jan 2016 #57
understood handmade34 Jan 2016 #58
Let's see - they arrested the guy who was getting the winning numbers csziggy Jan 2016 #56
UNREC brooklynite Jan 2016 #61
be nice if investigators would check Marthe48 Jan 2016 #65
I'll say it again... brooklynite Jan 2016 #71
Meh Gawdless Pinko Lib Jan 2016 #66
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. Unbelievable. I didn't even check my tickets yet.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:38 AM
Jan 2016

I never do until the next day. Guess I'll spend another 20 for Wednesday. That is crazy though 1.3 billion.

Freelancer

(2,107 posts)
5. Why not make 1,300 millionaires instead? I don't get it.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:48 AM
Jan 2016

Picture the ad -- the camera backs out of an image of a single $1,000,000 winner to gradually show an aerial shot of 1,300 people holding up their tickets -- all millionaires (before taxes). If people saw that, even more would think they had a chance, IMO.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
7. I was hoping there'd have been 1000 winning tickets
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:05 AM
Jan 2016

That'd have been a lot of new people with about 450k

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
8. The odds of winning...
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:05 AM
Jan 2016

Are somewhat astromical; something like 282 million to one. Why would I risk money against those odds to win a lousy million dollars?

Freelancer

(2,107 posts)
14. LOL. Very true. But...
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:34 AM
Jan 2016

If you look at your life, things do happen that have astronomical odds.

I once saw a garage sale sign pointing down a cul-de-sac when I was in a town 20 miles from home on business. I decided to drive down and check it out. I got out of the car, and practically bumped the door into my aunt and great aunt that I hadn't seen in 10 yrs. They both live in North Carolina, and were passing through my state on the way to Nebraska. They'd pulled off the interstate there to get gas and eat lunch at a McDonalds. My aunt saw a garage sale sign when they left McD's and they decided to go to it.

The odds of us crossing paths were very high -- probably in the hundreds of thousands to one -- of going to the same sale even higher. That we'd time out exactly multiplies that by some factor as well. The odds may not be 282 million to one, but the number must be up there somewhere in the neighborhood.

I'm not saying that buying a power ball ticket makes mathematical sense -- it doesn't -- just that we all have things happen that the odds are highly against. Yet, they happen.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
31. AKA: "Serendipity". AKA: "There are more thngs in heaven and hell than
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:17 AM
Jan 2016

are dreamt of in thy philosophy, Horatio." ~Hamlet

William Seger

(10,778 posts)
13. Because every record-breaking jackpot means record-breaking profits
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:31 AM
Jan 2016

That's precisely why they made the game tougher in October.

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
23. The odds used to be better.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:26 AM
Jan 2016

But people stopped buying tickets unless the jackpot was $100 million. So they changed the odds to get to $100 million more often.

It may have been ridiculous then but now the odds are incredible.

But I still plunk down my $2 twice a week. Part of paying the poor tax.

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
42. Explain how that would work...
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:39 AM
Jan 2016

This is a simple game...pick a random sequence of numbers and see if one or more people match. If you 1,300 $1 M prizes, you'd need to keep picking new number sets endlessly.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
48. That's a great idea!
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jan 2016

I really wish at this point they would do something like that. Nobody needs to be that rich.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,174 posts)
72. There are other drawings with better odds
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:32 AM
Jan 2016

and lower payouts. People play them too, they just don't get as much press. Statistically, the more people buy tickets, the more likely it is that there will be multiple winners, thus splitting the pot.

 

Feeling the Bern

(3,839 posts)
9. odds of winning: 1/292,000,000. Come one Americans bad at math. . .the lottery needs your
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:09 AM
Jan 2016

underpaid salaries!

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
51. Okay, so explain the math, smart guy
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 12:53 PM
Jan 2016

If the odds are 1 in 282 million, and the prize is 1 billion, then what is the expectation value?

kelly1mm

(4,732 posts)
59. if only one ticket could have the correct numbers is would be about $4 EV for every $1, but
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:12 PM
Jan 2016

since MORE than one ticket can have the winning numbers and the total jackpot is split between the winning tickets it is not as high, probably still positive EV but certainly not 4:1.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
60. Good answer
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:17 PM
Jan 2016

The usual answer is about the variance being high, but that's really a much better answer.

William Seger

(10,778 posts)
64. Realistically, it never gets positive
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:09 PM
Jan 2016

Assuming you take the cash instead of the annuity (i.e. the "real" jackpot value), and factoring in the probability of splitting with other winners, and after paying taxes on what's left, here's one example: If the jackpot gets to $2 billion and there are 600 million tickets sold, the expected value or "return on investment" of your $2 bet is only about $1.43.

The chart on that page shows that when the number of tickets sold is greater than about 200 million, the odds are that there will be one or more winners. There were over 440 million tickets sold in this Saturday draw, so there was about a 78% chance someone would win. The possibility of multiple winners hurts the EV more than I would have thought. Oddly enough, when the number of tickets is over about 370 million, it becomes more likely that there will be multiple winners than a single winner.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
30. Yeah PCH they really got me going -
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:00 AM
Jan 2016

every time I got a mailing from them, as a Genuine Possible Winner, I would spend time sticking the stickers in the little boxes and putting serious thought into what color I wanted my Jaguar car prize to be.

Then one day I got another sweepstakes notification in the mail - and also one for the guy in the apartment below. We were both Genuine Possible Winners! I thought, hmmmm what are the odds? That was the beginning of the end.

Of course all the stories about how it's a scam also helped wake me up.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
37. I had a mouthful of coffee when reading your initial post. Very painful ejection
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:25 AM
Jan 2016

through nostrils and now I need a whole new monitor!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
19. Holy crap, on the one hand. On the other hand, this is starting to smell.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:23 AM
Jan 2016

Was powerball perhaps needing a publicity boost?

William Seger

(10,778 posts)
22. It was done quite openly to increase profits
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:02 AM
Jan 2016

The changes in October made the odds go from 1 in 175 million to 1 in 292 million, and it was specifically intended to make bigger jackpots, because big jackpots send sales through the roof. The change meant that the jackpot was 10 times more likely to get to a billion than with the old odds, so mission accomplished

merrily

(45,251 posts)
24. Thank you. I guessed correctly about the intentional nature, wrong about the smell.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 07:01 AM
Jan 2016

That's either a score of 50% or a wash, depending on how hard I want to be on myself this morning.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
36. Thanks. I'm in such a great mood this morning, I am going to agree with you.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:25 AM
Jan 2016

Seems somehow wrong to be the first person to give myself a failing grade.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
53. That was from his book about how inadequate his critic's education was to the task of
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:49 PM
Jan 2016

evaluating _his_ work. And just btw, his idea of an improved education that would give them the tools they lacked relied heavily on the ideas of old dead white europeans, a philosophy of traditionalists and conservatives.

And here it is.

Another of his quotes I remember more often...


"True ease in writing comes from art, not chance,
As those move easiest who have learned to dance"


That applies to many other things, as well as writing. Talent is good, but you gotta have skills.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
54. Tecnically, it was from his long poem "An Essay on Criticism." Back then, the
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:56 PM
Jan 2016

word "essay" was closer in meaning to the French verb "essayer" than to its modern prose manifestation.

Not just old while Europeans, but also the Greek and Latin classics (although those also are European

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
70. It has always reminded me of the viewpoint of the privileged, industrialists or plantation owners
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 03:19 AM
Jan 2016

perhaps, others now, who find themselves challenged. First thing they tell you is that you don't know enough to critique them, to suggest they may be stealing from your labor.

Yes we do. Nothing wrong with a little learning at all. Sometimes it gets you killed, but so does slavery and servitude.

I think challenging authority is always worthwhile. Keeps them on their toes. And it's fun.

joshdawg

(2,647 posts)
25. I can only say this about that:
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 07:19 AM
Jan 2016

If I did win the lottery, the only thing I could do would be to put it toward my bills as far as it would go.
/s

Uben

(7,719 posts)
28. I've already beat 290,000,000 to One odds
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:41 AM
Jan 2016

Won a $1000 at Long John Silvers back in the eighties. They had a scratch-off ticket promotion with six items you could scratch, but you could only scratch one. There were three tickets nationally with the chance for $1000 and if you got one of those tickets, you had to scratch the correct line...and I did! So, I guess my winning days are done

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
38. Real gamblers would say that was the beginning of a 'hot streak' and you should
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:27 AM
Jan 2016

have ridden that baby for all she was worth!

Igel

(35,300 posts)
49. And that's what it is.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 12:09 PM
Jan 2016

People will pay $5 for a drink and feel slightly better for an hour or two or $2 to fantasize and de-stress slightly about the future for a few days.

One's okay and normal and the other is gambling and throwing away your money.

Most people don't play the lottery to gamble, but to fantasize. Best to put it in the right category.

(There's also the potential return on investment. At this point, it's positive because the potential pay-off is to high.)

Marthe48

(16,935 posts)
46. Good comparison to corporate welfare?
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:34 AM
Jan 2016

Many people who can least afford it donate to a faceless entity that will ultimately benefit only a handful of people.

I played $10, did not get a single number

Tom_Foolery

(4,691 posts)
47. I read that 25 tickets matched five numbers for a $1 million...
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 11:37 AM
Jan 2016

and three won $2 million with the Powerplay option. That makes 28 tickets that matched five numbers, missing the jackpot by one number. I can't even imagine listening to the drawing live and have those five numbers come up, then miss out by one.

Two times in November, I matched two numbers and the Powerball; but I was off by one on the other three numbers. I told my sister that the lottery gods were screwing with me.

I remember back in the '80s when a $40 million jackpot would create lines around the corner. Now it's nothing.

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
52. just think...
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:14 PM
Jan 2016

if we weren't all brainwashed and we would quit bitching about paying a few extra dollars in taxes (which we spend on useless lottery tickets anyways) we could afford to provide housing to every homeless person, or food to every hungry child, or a livable wage to millions, or..........

...the real winner of the lottery system is not the person who buys the winning ticket. The real winner is the government, which taxes the winner. The government automatically withholds 25%, but the winner will be bumped into the highest marginal tax bracket in the case of the lump sum. In addition, the player will very likely pay a state tax (usually 4% to 9%) and perhaps even local taxes.


we are all fools...

the lottery is Robin Hood in reverse and we are too disconnected and ignorant to work together to really make a difference in the world...

one study found individuals making $13,000 or less spend a shocking 9 percent of their incomes on lotteries.



Lotteries prey on the gullible, desperate, and poor, amounting in essence to a highly regressive tax... For all intents and purposes, lotteries are used for the same purposes as taxes... by picking the pockets of the neediest. Rather, we should either increase conventional taxes...But politicians lose their jobs when they raise taxes or cut programs...
 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
57. Well considering I have more chance of getting struck by lightening .. I still bought a ticket.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:51 PM
Jan 2016

I'm one of those desperate individuals, like so many Americans today, who could use a few bucks to help out. No big house with a yacht in the back yard. Just bills, mostly debt and medical expenses. We're all in the same boat. I really would like to know where all those 'taxes' go. I know some $$ here in GA goes towards the HOPE scholarship .. and the fat cats that run the program's salary.

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
58. understood
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:00 PM
Jan 2016

my household still buys a ticket each week... just for fun- in lieu of a coffee or other treat and then we can play 'what if' and have reason to bitch about the unfairness of it all... we are pretty much all in the same boat and unfortunately not able at this time to work on an alternative

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
56. Let's see - they arrested the guy who was getting the winning numbers
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:30 PM
Jan 2016

Maybe he left it rigged so if he couldn't scam the system no one won? I've always been sure that government run lotteries are just another way to put more money into the pockets of the 1%.

A jackpot-rigging scandal is forgotten as Powerball fever sweeps the United States

<SNIP>
Investigators never gave up on the curious case and, three years later, released surveillance footage of a hooded man buying the winning ticket in the hopes that someone would recognize him. Several people identified him as Edward Tipton, Multi-State Lottery Association’s former security director.

Tipton was charged with fraud almost exactly one year ago, on Jan. 15, 2015. Investigators argued that Tipton was able to secure the winning ticket for himself through self-destructing software he installed on lottery computers, according to the Des Moines Register. Tipton then allegedly filtered the ticket through a friend in Texas. Ultimately, he was found guilty of two counts of fraud last July and sentenced to 10 years in prison last September.

The investigation expands

In October, investigators alleged that Tipton also rigged a $4.8 million jackpot in Colorado in 2005 and a $2 million jackpot in Wisconsin in 2007. They have also investigated alleged rigging in Kansas and Oklahoma.

After the investigation was expanded nationwide in early October, Multi-State’s executive director Charles Strutt — who had run Powerball since it was created — was quietly placed on indefinite administrative leave, according to the Associated Press. Strutt hopes to return to the job when the Tipton case ends.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/01/09/the-company-that-runs-powerball-had-a-16-5-million-jackpot-rigged-by-a-former-employee/

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
61. UNREC
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 07:54 PM
Jan 2016

Lottery winnings go into State Government funds, frequently into educational programs. What evidence do you have that it goes "into the pockets of the the 1%" besides "we all know"?

Marthe48

(16,935 posts)
65. be nice if investigators would check
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:13 PM
Jan 2016

electronic voting machines with a little of the same enthusiasm.

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
71. I'll say it again...
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 08:28 AM
Jan 2016

...I've talked to candidate who've lost elections; I've talked to Party leaders; I've talked to campaign managers. NONE of them believe their losses were due to rigging voting machines.

Republicans steal elections the old-fashioned way.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BREAKING: Lottery officia...