Planned Parenthood pushes back against Sanders for 'establishment' comment
Source: Politico
Planned Parenthood pushes back against Sanders for 'establishment' comment
By Eliza Collins
01/20/16 03:24 PM EST
Updated 01/20/16 04:40 PM EST
Planned Parenthood and other progressive groups are calling out Bernie Sanders for referring to them as "part of the establishment," saying the Vermont senator needs to show a more explicit commitment to women's reproductive health.
"It's a little ridiculous to call an organization Congress and Republican presidential candidates have spent six months attacking establishment especially when Planned Parenthood health centers are out there every day ensuring millions of often marginalized Americans have access to basic reproductive health care, Dawn Laguens, executive vice president of Planned Parenthood Action Fund told POLITICO in an email.
Laguens said she was disappointed in Sanders comments.
It's regrettable and surprising to hear Sen. Sanders describe the very groups that fight on behalf of millions of often marginalized Americans people who still have to fight for their most basic rights as representing the establishment, Laguens said.
On Tuesday night, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow asked Sanders why Hillary Clinton was getting so many high-profile progressive endorsements when Sanders stance on issues like gay rights and reproductive choice are very consistent, they should be very attractive to progressive groups.....................
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/planned-parenthood-bernie-sanders-218026#ixzz3xpTBnBN9
Sanders is way off the wall with this comment.
#ImSoEstablishment I believe #PlannedParenthood should be applauded for providing women's healthcare #Hillary2016
Planned Parenthood pushes back against Sanders for 'establishment' comment
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/planned-parenthood-bernie-sanders-218026#ixzz3xpTBnBN9 #StandwithPP #ImWithHer #p2
Tarheel_Dem
(31,222 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)I mean PP purpose is to give women healthcare?.
You would think they'd be jumping up and down,so happy that
the very women they want to help,will be getting even MORE help from single payer?
Bernie wants to see this happen for us.
PP does not want more women to be cared for?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)debunction.junction
(127 posts)This way of thinking is everything that is wrong with America.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)debunction.junction
(127 posts)I will just say this, it is disappointing that as a Bernie supporter you find it necessary to try to down play "hope and change." Of course time will tell, a lot can happen in ten years. Have a good evening.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)It's true. I looked it up in the anti-establishment dictionary.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)So let's not pretend it's an issue we shouldn't worry about this election.
.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)Bernie will do that.
TM99
(8,352 posts)the pragmatic and sensible woodchucks that the ACA was the start of the process.
Suckers! Fooled again, it seems. For Clinton et al, the ACA is the end. Of course, I am not surprised, as she has been pushing an insurance mandated health plan since the 1990's.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)one state will have to show that it can make such a system work, that people will be willing to pay higher taxes for lower premiums and deductibles, and to lose their employer-sponsored private health insurance and have it replaced by a new government program.
Vermont gave it a go, and whiffed
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)if I understand right.We already pay into this,and with higher taxes,everyone would be covered.
"Under Bernie's healthcare plan, an estimated 27% of households will pay $0 in healthcare premiums,
68% pay less than $100/month, and 91% pay less than $250/month.
Plus, if you get sick or injured, NO copayment at the doctor, NO deductibles for treatments. "--reddit
debunction.junction
(127 posts)With single payer health care there would not be a need for planned parenthood and their support would dry up.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)debunction.junction
(127 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)still be needed. Millions of people will still need help.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)and then in the same article:
The idea to increase access to health care was good, but there was something noticeably missing for those at Planned Parenthood: any mention of womens reproductive rights, Schifeling told POLITICO.
Reproductive rights was not mentioned. Weight problems and diabetes was not mentioned. High blood pressure and vascular issues were not mentioned. Hell...nothing specific was mentioned, but lets attack Bernie for leaving out reproductive rights.
Jesus on a cracker...what is wrong with you people?
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)First off many are in very convenient locations, so they might still be the go to choice for women. Second if they don't diversify their services they might still attract people who would rather not go to a regular clinic or doctor for birth control and other services, some people are weird about that. Third if it turns out that people are perfectly fine going to a general practitioner instead of PP, well there is always diversifying their services because as I said they are usually in very convenient locations and some people might like the idea of not having to go far to see a doctor.
debunction.junction
(127 posts)I was simply pointing out that their endorsement for Hillary was based on their own personal agenda. If single payer becomes the law, the need for PP will be diminished. I have no idea what effect single payer would have on women's reproductive rights. Hope someone asked Bernie.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)that they did not need to pay for insurance that provided abortion or even contraception because it went against their religious beliefs.
So single payer will have to fight this battle. And we need to get more liberals on the supreme court to prevent things like this from happening again.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)What are single layer supporters willing to give up to get it to pass?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)If the grassroots movement stays strong, we can win without losing.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Maybe a president Sanders should wait to get single payer done until there are enough progressives in Congress and on the court. I'd be OK with that.
debunction.junction
(127 posts)But isn't that one of the benefits of single payer? Employers will no longer be providing insurance to their employees, so that specific argument would be moot. The argument would then be about their tax dollars. May people would prefer their tax dollars did not go to fund the military industrial complex. Good luck with that.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)They will try to use religion as an excuse not to pay if there is anything in the plan that they don't like. Like contraception or abortion. So we need to keep on fighting for reproductive rights. But we already knew that with the Hobby Lobby decision.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)So the fed government is forbidden to use any fed funds to.pay for abortion and if insurance through employers is abolished, where does the insurance come from?
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Single payer does not provide care. pp provides care. There are several points about single payer and pp. PP has been under attack for years. Before I support single payer I want a statement that no supporter of single payer would be willing to throw reproductive rights under the bus to get single payer passed. We already gave in on not requiring employers to provide insurance covering birth control. We already caved on the Hyde amendment. States have chipped away at women's healthcare rights. I see a war on women. I stand with women. I don't care who the candidate is, I am from the griswald era, the roe era. We have already given up to much.
I can understand the history of pp and the fight for reproductive rights and the reluctance to back single payer without an iron clad commitment to making single payer include birth control and abortion.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Before I support single payer I want a statement that no supporter of single payer would be willing to throw reproductive rights under the bus to get single payer passed.
What makes you think anyone supporting single payer will throw reproductive rights under the bus? This is progressives you are talking about. We are pro-choice. That is crazy talk. That is red baiting like Hillary would use. Scare tactics to keep people from even engaging in real progress.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)I don't trust Congress. Single payer is not going to pass without a few rewrites and tweaks even with dem majorities in both chambers. What was given up to get obamacare done? And there will be challanges to get it in front of the ussc by the right-wing. Unless you think there will be a sudden influx of progressives, there are going to be opponents to single payer that will use women's healthcare as a wedge. Look what Obama had to do after the catholic church and hobby lobby went after women.
And this isn't a red herring. Women cannot be sacrificed in another healthcare bill.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)If it happens again under single payer, it will still only affect those women who work for those companies that won...and that is a limited win. In time we would beat them, as the supreme court changes back to liberal agendas. It will happen. And nobody will willing give up reproductive rights to get SP to pass. If it happens it will happen after the fact, like ACA...then we just have another battle on our hands.
But...Big but here. One of Bernie's agendas is changing the stranglehold that congress has now and the supreme court. He wants us as grassroots to push to get more liberal people in congress and on the court. It's our job! We've let republicans have control of this country (by not voting) for far too long. We need to GOTV!
debunction.junction
(127 posts)But your posts are bugging me
MH1
(17,573 posts)(from article linked in OP; emphasis added)
"The problem is that by omitting reproductive health and rights, you run the risk of significantly rolling back the progress we've made over the past seven years," Schifeling said. "If you expand Medicare without repealing the Hyde Amendment, millions of women will lose insurance coverage for abortion. And as we've seen with the Affordable Care Act, unless the administration explicitly specifies that birth control must be covered, women may not have access to a full range of birth control and preventive services."
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/planned-parenthood-bernie-sanders-218026#ixzz3xpgoDV00
riversedge
(70,084 posts)debunction.junction
(127 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Dogs, fleas, are you really surprised?
earthside
(6,960 posts)It gets millions and million of tax dollars from the federal government.
We celebrate the establishment of reproductive rights in several court cases and pieces of legislation stretching back into the 1960s.
The board of directors of the PP Action Fund -- who are political insiders, fundraisers, lobbyists, etc. -- endorsed Clinton.
If the shoe fits, wear it.
It's almost kind of weird that Planned Parenthood now all of a sudden finds 'establishment' a dirty word.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)The "establishment" has been getting plundered.
earthside
(6,960 posts)But ... Planned Parenthood was fully funded in the just passed federal budget agreement.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Boy, someone really is a one trick pony.
earthside
(6,960 posts)"One trick pony"?
Maybe you ought to spend some time on your writing clarity skills.
Fact remains, that PP is so well established that even the Tea Party Repuglicans in the Congress gave in and fully funded that organization.
Like I said, you can't get any more establishment than Planned Parenthood.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)They pretend that there wasn't a fight in Congress just a handful of months ago to defund PP. Are they so blind that they don't see anything beyond Sanders' nose??????
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)When Bernie wins ever primary, and every state in the general election and all 435 seats flip to us we'll never have to worry again.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)mainer
(12,018 posts)They should have remained neutral until the primaries were over. Both Hillary and Bernie would be acceptable candidates. Why choose sides so early in the game?
I can't help feeling that Bernie has a point.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Of course, I could be wrong. Planned Parenthood may just be one of the services that is rolled into single payer as a provider. But they aren't taking any chances. Not going to wait and see...lets just kill single payer now.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Hillary is correct about the Hyde amendment which I just thought I'd mention.
Single payer doesn't provide services to anyone, it pays for services. I don't know why people confuse the 2.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Planned Parenthood is a provider, but they are funded by the government, not paid for with insurance. So I don't know if they will work with a single payer plan and just continue services, or not.
I see no reason at this point why they shouldn't be able to...but if that's true, then why are they afraid of single payer?
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Although I'm thinking if we wind up with a Congress that will pass single payer then we should also try to rid it of the Hyde amendment.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)If they had endorsed Sanders
TM99
(8,352 posts)They have not once in 100 years endorsed in the primary...until now.
Response to riversedge (Original post)
Post removed
ecstatic
(32,652 posts)I'm really curious to hear which candidate you claim to support.
That is what they did for 100 years. They waited until after the primary.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)WTF is wrong with you?
REP
(21,691 posts)All of womankind shares a single vagina. More news you can use!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)REP
(21,691 posts)I'll show the Jury results and let you guess which one was me.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)REP
(21,691 posts)emsimon33
(3,128 posts)If Bernie gets universal health care, they may lose they power. Oh well... .
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Establishment.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Not one cent to Sanders at all.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)He doesn't need your money.
comradebillyboy
(10,128 posts)Planned Parenthood. PP provides much needed services in the real world right now. Throwing them under the bus for pie in the sky bye and bye is pretty short sighted. Also Bernie is not proposing to get rid of the Hyde amendment which would prevent his taxpayer funded plan from providing any abortion services at all.
Omaha Steve
(99,495 posts)Bernie has a stellar record on choice. PP's political committee should have waited until after there was a clear winner in the D column as past practice.
OS
glinda
(14,807 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)the less acceptable he is as a candidate.
But third place is the lowest we can go in this years crop of candidates.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)A classy response about being disappointed but respecting their decision would have sufficed, but that's not the revolutionary way.
Dogmatic, unbending, we are on the right and there's no room for other opinions, is more his campaign's way.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Shouldn't this be in GD-P?
Never mind.
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)no one's really responding to the contents of PP's message, they just attack Planned Parenthood.
Planned Parenthood is being attacked. On a site full of DEMOCRATS. WTF is going on here, really?
Bernin
(311 posts)It's been talked about here before.
That Hillary, will split the party.
These are the opening salvos.
Sure, Hillary is the one who's doing the splitting. Not the guy who's spent his political career bashing Democrats and only became a Democrat when it was politically expedient for him to do so...
kacekwl
(7,013 posts)We know where Bernie stands , we know where Hillary stands. Come on there are much more important things to focus on.