Des Moines Register Endorses Rubio and Clinton in Iowa Caucuses
Source: Bloomberg
U.S. Senator Marco Rubio and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton received potential boosts to their presidential bids in Iowa by winning the endorsements of the Des Moines Register, the dominant newspaper in the state where the Feb. 1 caucuses will start the 2016 nomination voting.
"Rubio has the potential to chart a new direction for the party, and perhaps the nation, with his message of restoring the American dream," Iowa's largest newspaper said in an endorsement of Florida Republican published on its website Saturday evening. "We endorse him because he represents his partys best hope."
On the Democratic side, the newspaper's editorial said this of Clinton: "No other candidate can match the depth or breadth of her knowledge and experience."
The editorial made note of Clinton's top rival, U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, and the emotional appeal he's generated in the party: "In the final analysis, Iowa Democrats will have to choose between the lofty idealism of Bernie Sanders and the down-to-earth pragmatism of Hillary Clinton. For some, this will be a choice of whether to vote with their hearts or their heads."
Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-01-23/des-moines-register-endorses-rubio-and-clinton-in-iowa-caucuses
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)UGH Rubio
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)by Marco Rubio is a party that ought to disband before it collapses of its own stupidity.
lamp_shade
(14,826 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)Republican are turning on each other "like rats in a slum fire," to steal Hunter Thompson's great phrase.
The Pukes have a stageful of extremely unqualified candidates, each desperately trying to pretend that his balls are bigger than all the others, Ms. Fiorina's inclusion on the stage notwithstanding, by claiming ___ loses big to the Democrats, by claiming ___ can't handle Putin or ISIS, and by claiming ____ will install amnesty as a core foreign policy tenet.
forest444
(5,902 posts)what that party needs is a RICO warrant.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)dissembing, prompted by a blue landslide up and down the ballot in November.
I would never have guessed Trump would run, nevermind that he would command the field a week before the Iowa caucuses.
One plus of having him in there at all is that he may take three-quarters of other Republicans down with him. That would be a very good outcome and at least some compensation for having to listen to him flap his bigoted mouth all these past months.
forest444
(5,902 posts)Having the Donald drag down that many GOP congresscritters with him would be, well, yooge!
underpants
(182,762 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)when he recites his lines, and frankly, he recites them not too shabbily. But, ask a follow-up question, and this glaze crosses over his eyes, as he tries to remember what he memorized. He is, bar none, as shallow and dimensionless candidate that I have ever seen. Even George Bush spoke rather smartly as governor of Texas. I disagreed with him always, but he spoke well (unlike his time as president). Rubio is a leaf ready to fall with the slightest gust or headwind.
MBS
(9,688 posts)Rubio has this way of reeling off a lot of words with a kind of fluency, but at the end you realize his words don't really say anything.Yup, you're right, "shallow and dimensionless". I'd also add "shamelessly careerist" and an irresponsible work ethic (his pattern seems to be that he gets elected to an office, and uses it not to do the work he was elected to do, but to promote himself to another, higher office. Hopefully, this trick won't work this time).
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)He worries me. He could attract a lot of voters if he has better stage managing. He could be their best hope.
The age disparity worries me. Over the past 40 + years, if there was a substantial age difference, the younger candidate has won (except the actor).
I fear the debates will look like a parent verbally beating up on a kid.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)But then again, I don't get the appeal of any of the republican nominees.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)He is such an endless source of jokes and humor, that few of the others can come close as entertainment.
Actually, Santorum included, I think that there are at least six GOPers who have serious mental issues. Putting anyone of them in charge of this country would destroy it.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Topped only by Sarah Palin, of course. Rubio is riding along on the crazy train, though.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Transparent.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)The source of Santorum's essence is from the deepest recesses of humanity.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Frothy Santorum
was a very nasty man.
a religious rube
filled with KY lube,
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)elleng
(130,864 posts)In 1988, they endorsed Paul Simon, Illinois
In 1992, they did not endorse - Harkin was the favorite son that year, very surprised they did not honor him
In 2000, they endorsed Bill Bradley
In 2004, they endorsed John Edwards -- rather than several far better men running against him
In 2008, they endorsed HRC
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/editorials/endorsement/2016/01/22/history-register-caucus-endorsements/79158560/
In the 4 they endorsed, their pick lost both the Iowa caucus and the nomination. It is hard to see a pattern in their choices- especially remember that 2004 Edwards ran to the right of almost everyone but Lieberman.
#11 here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027555426
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Kerry and Gephardt would be the other options.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)of Edwards, do you? And certainly not Gen. Clark.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I believe he was in the mix at that point, too. He was to the left of Edwards certainly.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Candidates[edit]
Howard B. Dean III, former governor of Vermont
John R. Edwards, U.S. senator from North Carolina
Richard A. "Dick" Gephardt, U.S. representative from Missouri
John F. Kerry, U.S. senator from Massachusetts
Dennis J. Kucinich, U.S. representative from Ohio
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa_Democratic_caucuses,_2004
a kennedy
(29,644 posts)they endorsed ALL losers. Sorry, love all our canidadets, but this endorsement doesn't mean anything. Feeling the Bern.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)just wondering
TeamPooka
(24,220 posts)roody
(10,849 posts)elleng
(130,864 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)fucking Repukes
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)I know of thousands (or is it millions) that will move a different candidate forward.
No more Turd Way or Tea Baggers in D.C.
rurallib
(62,406 posts)The Register's influence faded long ago when Gannet bought them.
From my perspective, Gannet just endorsed Hillary which is about what we should expect of corporate news.
But it will look good on the shelf with all the other endorsements that mean little these days.
Don't know if the Rubio endorsement will have any impact and frankly do not care. Considering that Iowa Repugs usually vote for a new pope then Rubio won't be it.
progressoid
(49,977 posts)StandingInLeftField
(972 posts)Corporate media and union management endorsements mean nothing, and I would be ashamed if they DID endorse Bernie.
George II
(67,782 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)"The presidency is not an entry-level position. Whoever is sworn into office next January must demonstrate not only a deep understanding of the issues facing America, but also possess the diplomatic skills that enable presidents to forge alliances to get things done.
By that measure, Democrats have one outstanding candidate deserving of their support: Hillary Clinton. No other candidate can match the depth or breadth of her knowledge and experience.
-------
Sanders has tapped into the publics anger and frustration with Washington, without demonizing government and resorting to the cheap demagoguery favored by Donald Trump and others. He has shown himself to be a man of courage and principle who has the ability to rally others to his cause.
But Sanders admits that virtually all of his plans for reform have no chance of being approved by a Congress that bears any resemblance to the current crop of federal lawmakers. This is why, he says, voters cant simply elect him president, but must instead spark a political revolution.
Easier said than done. Congress has the largest Republican majority since the 71st Congress of 1929-31.
A successful Sanders presidency would hinge on his ability to remake Washington in his own image. Its almost inconceivable that such a transformation could take place, even with Democrats controlling both chambers of Congress."
Hear, hear!!!!!
Rafale
(291 posts)EXPECT.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)so now the register endorses HRC again.
How did that work out last time?
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Least surprising news of the day
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Any paper with an ounce of real integrity and journalistic courage would have looked at the Republican field and refused to endorse any of them. Which, of course, means that no paper in the country will do that.
Any reasonably intelligent high schooler could write a slam-dunk editorial on why none of the Republican candidates is remotely qualified or fit to be president.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)riversedge
(70,186 posts)Adam Parkhomenko @AdamParkhomenko 20m20 minutes ago
HUGE: #fitn
lamp_shade
(14,826 posts)riversedge
(70,186 posts)Response to lamp_shade (Original post)
lamp_shade This message was self-deleted by its author.