Bernie Sanders a Target of Ads by Republican Donor
Source: NY Times
A super PAC founded by the former TD Ameritrade executive Joe Ricketts is spending more than $600,000 on a television ad in Iowa lashing Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont as too liberal in the final days of his close race against Hillary Clinton in the states caucuses.
The spot, being aired by the ESA Fund, describes Mr. Sanderss policy positions on a range of issues, such as tuition-free college and single-payer health care, saying that it amounts to a flood of new government spending. There will be tax increases on Wall Street, big businesses and the super-rich, the ad goes on to say.
The spot is expected to be backed by $600,000 in spending on television ads, and there will be additional expenditures on radio and digital advertising.
Mr. Ricketts has been a major Republican donor this cycle in the presidential race, but with the ad, his group is injecting itself into the Democratic nominating contest.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/25/bernie-sanders-a-target-of-ads-by-republican-donor/?_r=0
Ricketts is a scared billionaire that owns the Chicago Cubs. His son is the Gov. of Nebraska. Here is how the Ricketts family treated the workers over a few $.
Cubs Cut Workers' Hours To Avoid O-Care Mandate, Then Disaster Struck: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/chicago-cubs-field-workers-obamacare-tarp-disaster
Health Wagon
(99 posts)sarcasm intended.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)mdbl
(4,973 posts)take your pick.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)Because it actually helps Bernie. Free college, healthcare is supposed to scare liberal voters?
These billionaires aren't too bright.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)money... Brains..
JudyM
(29,187 posts)taxes than their kids going to college? This guy must live in an echo chamber.
Jarqui
(10,122 posts)to me, it's a positive ad for Bernie
certainot
(9,090 posts)is he doing this for rove and co?
Bernin
(311 posts)We say they have more dollars than sense.
dsc
(52,152 posts)he is aikening him
madokie
(51,076 posts)rather than what they intended it to be.
Getting rid of the insurance companies who are robbing us blind and replace that with a small tax increase sounds like a winner to me. I know they didn't mention getting rid of the insurance companies premiums or co-pays but most of us can see that for ourselves as a result of a healthcare for all, government run healthcare for all like Medicare.
Bernie is our next President. Sometimes I wish I wasn't so against gambling because if that was the case I'd be taking bets on this.
SamKnause
(13,087 posts)I don't think anyone feels sorry for Wall Street.
I think this ad will help, not hurt Bernie.
certainot
(9,090 posts)the real purpose here is to try to defeat hillary and this guy is probably doing it for rove etc..
mckara
(1,708 posts)That should backfire on the stupid Republicans
TexasBushwhacker
(20,136 posts)I'd like to send Richie Rich a thank you card. Seriously, he just proves that just because you're rich doesn't mean you're smart.
fbc
(1,668 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Are shitting their pants over Bernie and his Yooge support.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Are coming from Billionaires too? Hmmmm....
rpannier
(24,328 posts)Reminding him that his public comments about Obama needed to stop.
Partially because it was a bad reflection on the league and partially because he owns a team in Chicago
Beowulf
(761 posts)eom
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Privately his son probably agrees with him. But publicly he has asked his dad to cut it out. He can not, of course, force his dad to do so as we see here.
californiabernin
(421 posts)I mean, he has no chance of every becoming president, right? He will lose to whoever the Republican nominee is right?
I don't get. Please, someone, explain this!
certainot
(9,090 posts)safeinOhio
(32,635 posts)is like telling republicans someone is to conservative.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)How did he get a billionaire to pay for and run an ad for him?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)certainot
(9,090 posts)arranged it to help bernie
UpInArms
(51,280 posts)SunSeeker
(51,508 posts)I see you Joe Ricketts. And I know exactly what youre up to. #ToddAkin Dont fall for it Iowa Dems, she wrote.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/25/bernie-sanders-a-target-of-ads-by-republican-donor/?_r=0
scottie55
(1,400 posts)"tax increases on Wall Street, big businesses and the super-rich,"
So this is a Bernie ad right?
Taxing Wall Street bad right?
Taxing big business bad right?
Taxing the super rich bad right?
How did this guy make his money?
Smoking crack?
scottie55
(1,400 posts)They are scared sh*tless.
Truprogressive85
(900 posts)Is this the best the financiers of the GOP can do ?
Bernin
(311 posts)right wingers tell me they are not opposed to Bernie. And, a few said they would even vote for him considering the choices they have on the R side.
This is confirmation that the GOP realizes Bernie will win the nomination.
Nyan
(1,192 posts)I'm guessing they'll escalate to crazy and bat-shit crazy as soon as Bernie wins the nomination.
jhart3333
(332 posts)Kall
(615 posts)... this means they think the most difficult Democrat to beat in a general election would be - wait, abort, abort.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)and therefore not running ads against Sanders...
Vinca
(50,236 posts)get healthcare and live off something other than cat food in their golden years. Sickening.
sinkingfeeling
(51,436 posts)clips of every one of the GOP idiots clamoring for war against Iran and/or Syria and how they want to have an even a bigger military. Say something about the percentage of that debt that is from our ill-fated wars and the $trillions the Pentagon has 'misplaced". Then ask if they're too liberal with your money in the quest for world control.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Then you get the punch line. I think a lot of people will be put off, saying these ideas are "too liberal". probably wiped the smile of most peoples faces. I don't think this helps Hillary in any way. I actually think it works in Bernie's favor.
Telling liberals they are too liberal is not a winning slogan.
redwitch
(14,941 posts)Laughing here, do they really think this will hurt him????
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Even if you allow for my weird politics (hey, I'm I retired electrician) you should be able to see that this ad is aimed at BOOSTING BERNIE, not knocking him down. The damn thing is like saying "Sanders loves kittens and little kids" (which is probably true). Labeling him a "liberal" in Iowa is like throwing prime rib to hungry tigers. A lot of Iowans probably think Bernie is too right wing, judging by the polls. Even the images included put the best possible slant of the campaigns goals. And taxing the rich? Yeah, that one is real unpopular. If I saw this without knowing the background I'd be congratulating Bernie's ad team on another winner.
Please don't discount this as really being an shot at HRC. However, it is legitimate to think that it does lay out just what Sanders is saying in this campaign. So thanks for the help, Mr. Ricketts. And I'm sure there were aristocrats who supported the French Revolution.
How did that work out for them?
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)If you run on truth, principals, morals, and have nothing to fear or hide, then they can't tarnish you.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)Don't vote for Bernie, he wants to tax the rich. WTF?
Don't vote for Bernie. He wants to give you health care. WTH?
Don't vote for Bernie. He wants you to go to college for free. WTMFM????
Don't vote for Bernie. Your 1% owners demand it.
Wow, this ad is so much bad, and it's not The Onion.
PWPippin
(213 posts)I think the ad is intended to help Bernie because they think he'll be an easier candidate to beat. Never underestimate Bernie!