Clinton Leads Sanders By 8 Points In Latest Iowa Poll
Source: TPM
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has a solid lead in Iowa, according to a Public Policy Polling survey released Friday, with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) trailing by 8 points.
The PPP poll showed support for Clinton at 48 percent among Iowans likely to attend the Democratic caucuses, while Sanders stood at 40 percent. These results indicate a slightly wider lead for Clinton than when the same poll was conducted earlier this month, showing Clinton at 46 percent to Sanders 40 percent.
The Iowa race is crucial in the battle for the Democratic nomination, as polling in New Hampshire suggests a consolidating advantage for Sanders while Clinton has a clear lead in virtually all South Carolina polls. Different pollsters have shown a wide range of results for Iowa Democrats.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/polltracker/clinton-jan-ia-ppp-dems
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)favorable to HRC for IA. The CNN poll which had her 8 points down ahem - HRC must be SURGING.
SunSeeker
(51,545 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,228 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)oh yeah la la land,. ie second choice is probably Sanders never seen Omalley that high anywhere. Wall Street media must be in overdrive.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)George II
(67,782 posts).....of Sanders' support is concentrated in a few college towns. His support across the rest of the state is a lot lower because of that.
He could win each of those college districts 80-20 and still only get one delegate. But Clinton will win a higher number of delegates elsewhere.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)and Bernie's supporters can safely discount the results if he loses.
Thank you.
George II
(67,782 posts)But I'm sure that when Sanders loses (BTW, no one "loses" in states where caucuses are conducted) his supporters will try to discount the results.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)The raw vote total will likely not be reflected in the final delegate count because of the geographic distribution you brought up, so you're right--
it'll be a little difficult to say who really won or lost, even when it's over.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)Brilliant news!
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)I looked at 538, and it is a decently rated poll with a large sample size.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/iowa-democratic/#polls-only
getagrip_already
(14,674 posts)Net/net, Iowa is not a sure thing for either candidate - if he wins both ia and nh it still doesn't mean much given the demographics of the remaining primaries doesn't favor him - and if he loses he's probably finished sooner than later.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)hoosierlib
(710 posts)It assumes low turn-out, over samples those 45 and above (they break for Hillary 66 to 34) and admits that its a closer race once O'Malley voters are asked their to support the next candidate.
All Team Bernie has to do is get above turn-out at least 150k voters or higher (it was 240k in 2008) and it will be a barn burner. Its all about GOTV!
swilton
(5,069 posts)Sunny and high 40 degrees F
LiberalLovinLug
(14,168 posts)If Bernie loses in Iowa, he can still win. Its only that his message has not been heard much, thanks in a large part to the MSM.
Remember?:
http://www.socialistalternative.org/2008/01/11/elections-analysis-voters-demand-change-while-two-parties-offer-empty-promises-2/
Despite losing Iowa, Clinton recovered to win the New Hampshire primary, leaving the race for the Democratic nomination a wide-open contest between her and Obama.
Not that it did her any good, but this is a different kind of candidate. There is no one to the left of him siphoning off the liberal and youth vote.
Do not be discouraged fellow Berners. But be prepared for a win or a loss. Its only a small battle in the war.
calguy
(5,303 posts)But the reality is after NH Bernie is facing a huge mountain that he won't be able to climb.