Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,515 posts)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:21 PM Jan 2016

Oregon occupation organizer Ammon Bundy, brother denied bail

Source: Reuters

Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:09pm EST

Oregon occupation organizer Ammon Bundy, brother denied bail

Portland, Ore.


Ammon Bundy, organizer of the armed occupation of an Oregon wildlife refuge, will remain in custody pending his trial on felony conspiracy charges, a U.S. District Court judge ruled on Friday.

U.S. Magistrate Stacie Beckerman said she believed Bundy might attempt to occupy other federal property if she allowed him to be released on bail before his trial on charges of conspiracy to use force, intimidation or threats to impede federal officers from discharging their duties.

Bundy's brother, Ryan Bundy, was also ordered held.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-oregon-militia-hearing-idUSKCN0V72RB



(Short article, no more at link.)
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oregon occupation organizer Ammon Bundy, brother denied bail (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jan 2016 OP
Right on. n/t MBS Jan 2016 #1
Judge: Ammon Bundy, Ryan Bundy, and Ryan Payne pose a danger to the community L. Coyote Jan 2016 #11
The judge voiced exactly the right concerns. MBS Jan 2016 #26
Makes sense to me. immoderate Jan 2016 #2
Do they get snacks in jail? jpak Jan 2016 #3
bags o' dicks to be sure... dhill926 Jan 2016 #19
Not one of them will be convicted if their trials are held in their own backyards. randys1 Jan 2016 #4
Well atreides1 Jan 2016 #5
Yeah, that is true, but if trials are held where there is sympathy, could be a problem randys1 Jan 2016 #7
Portlanders won't have a lot of sympathy. passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #12
Where would that be and why would they hold trials there? They commited crimes in Oregon and they Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #17
Sorry #BundyBunch, you will be tried in Little Beirut! LOL L. Coyote Jan 2016 #13
I believe monicaangela Jan 2016 #21
Good. NV Whino Jan 2016 #6
Anyone have the address Bettie Jan 2016 #8
Send them snacks from Voodoo Doughnuts pinboy3niner Jan 2016 #20
I believe someone monicaangela Jan 2016 #22
I didn't think they'd be released 2naSalit Jan 2016 #9
Good decision treestar Jan 2016 #10
Good! They should deny bail for all of them. longship Jan 2016 #14
Good news! Jim__ Jan 2016 #15
They don't recognize the legitimacy of the court and have a history of armed defiance to law alcibiades_mystery Jan 2016 #16
The location will be determined by Federal Jurisdiction, since the charges are Federal. Ford_Prefect Jan 2016 #18
and no access to the internet? hopemountain Jan 2016 #23
Bundys think they are going to be able to make trial about Federal Land policy. yellowcanine Jan 2016 #24
They are going to be there a good long time because the FBI has a lot of work to do once they get yellowcanine Jan 2016 #25
Smart judge! lark Jan 2016 #27
The judge is a woman. nt awoke_in_2003 Jan 2016 #29
Complete and utter morans Politicub Jan 2016 #28

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
11. Judge: Ammon Bundy, Ryan Bundy, and Ryan Payne pose a danger to the community
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:46 PM
Jan 2016

U.S. Magistrate Judge Stacie Beckerman said at court hearings Friday for group leader Ammon Bundy, his brother Ryan Bundy and Ryan Payne that they pose a danger to the community and she's concerned they won't follow orders to return to Oregon for criminal proceedings........

In a court filing Friday, prosecutors say Bundy, his brother Ryan Bundy and others "have long been associated with armed conflicts with the federal government and have repeatedly rejected the authority of the federal government, making them unsuitable for court-ordered supervision."

They cite their participation Ammon Bundy and others took part in the 2014 armed standoff with the government over grazing rights led by the Bundys' father, Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy.

http://www.kgw.com/news/local/federal-court-case-vs-occupiers/24950920

MBS

(9,688 posts)
26. The judge voiced exactly the right concerns.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 02:00 AM
Jan 2016

They do pose a danger to the community, and they almost surely wouldn't follow orders to return to Oregon for trial and yes, they have been associated with previous armed conflicts with the federal government and they are unsuitable for court-ordered supervision.
Looks like she covered all the bases.

atreides1

(16,070 posts)
5. Well
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:32 PM
Jan 2016

Since neither one of the Bundy's are from Oregon, it's unlikely the trial will be held in their backyards!

There is a perfectly fine federal court in Portland, and the jury pool is very diverse.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
12. Portlanders won't have a lot of sympathy.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:48 PM
Jan 2016

If it was held in Pendleton, that would be a different story.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
17. Where would that be and why would they hold trials there? They commited crimes in Oregon and they
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:58 PM
Jan 2016

will stand trial here. Why would you think otherwise?

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
13. Sorry #BundyBunch, you will be tried in Little Beirut! LOL
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:48 PM
Jan 2016

Next time, pick a Mormon town to terrorize!

monicaangela

(1,508 posts)
21. I believe
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:12 PM
Jan 2016

they will get a fair trial in Portland Oregon. I also feel that the people that live in the town outside the reserve they occupied won't be too sympathetic regarding their actions. I personally feel the Bundy's and the rest of that group should be grateful for the fact that they have that thing known as white privilege in this nation. If they didn't, I don't believe they would be around to worry about bail or jail or anything else. Maybe they can be converted to Islam while they are in jail, that way the next time they try this they will see what happens when you don't have that privilege that they are taking for granted.

monicaangela

(1,508 posts)
22. I believe someone
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:14 PM
Jan 2016

already sent them a barrel of lubricant, maybe the feds will be sympathetic enough to allow them to bring it into the prison. I don't think they'll need Dildos, they'll have access to the real thing.

2naSalit

(86,515 posts)
9. I didn't think they'd be released
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:37 PM
Jan 2016

Since they are facing federal charges they will be brought before federal judge(es)... this is part of the 9th District, might not look favorably on them, they would have had an easier time of it if they'd stayed in the 10th District.

I could be mistaken about this, if so let me know how it works.

longship

(40,416 posts)
14. Good! They should deny bail for all of them.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:52 PM
Jan 2016

They drew the line in the sand, government is evil. Let them all stew in their own juices, in jail.

Fuck them all!

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
16. They don't recognize the legitimacy of the court and have a history of armed defiance to law
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 07:57 PM
Jan 2016

enforcement.

Why should they be granted bail? They are severely high risk to violate bail in a way that's a threat to the public safety, and to law enforcement officers.

Imagine these dudes got bail and set up another armed encampment and killed a federal LE officer? What magistrate would want that to be on his or her record?

Ford_Prefect

(7,876 posts)
18. The location will be determined by Federal Jurisdiction, since the charges are Federal.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 08:01 PM
Jan 2016

The Judge also made clear today that no one will be released under any circumstances until the occupation has ended.

Federal courts operate a bit differently than local criminal courts.

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2016/01/federal_magistrate_judge_as_lo.html

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
23. and no access to the internet?
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:42 PM
Jan 2016

no personal phone? limited monitored/recorded phone calls to immediate family, only? solitary? hope this is also a condition of his time in jail.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
24. Bundys think they are going to be able to make trial about Federal Land policy.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 09:59 PM
Jan 2016

I believe they are in for a rude awakening if they try that. Every time they go off on some "Constitutional" tangent the Federal Prosecutor is going to say, "Objection" and the Judge will sustain. After the first couple of times the Judge will have had enough and issue a warning to the defense lawyers to cut the crap.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
25. They are going to be there a good long time because the FBI has a lot of work to do once they get
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:05 PM
Jan 2016

access to the crime scene. And then they may have a bunch more charges to draw up, etc. And then their defense lawyers will need some time to do discovery - and there will be huge fights about what they are entitled to. Grazing permit records, etc. are not going to be admissible and a lot of time will be wasted before the lawyers get all that straightened out. Oh these suckers are in for a while before they even see a jury unless they can work out some kind of deal to avoid trial.

lark

(23,083 posts)
27. Smart judge!
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jan 2016

He'd definitely be causing trouble somewhere if released. He's got a track record and thankfully she took that into account.

Politicub

(12,165 posts)
28. Complete and utter morans
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 11:56 AM
Jan 2016

The federal government did a good job of managing this situation. I was one of the ones that wanted to see them go in and arrest them when it first started.

It's a good thing that clear-eyed people were in charge and not me.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Oregon occupation organiz...