retrowire
(10,345 posts)Makes sense.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Sanders is a self-described socialist who will not be the nominee. Time to awaken from dreamland.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)It's an undeniable fact so, here's some reading material I'm sure you'll ignore. You've been here long enough to see all the points, but I'm giving you these facts so I don't have to get drawn into some dumbass argument.
Here:
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/29052-five-reasons-no-progressive-should-support-hillary-clinton
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/walker-bragman/hillary-clinton-is-no-pro_b_9204690.html
Hillary called TPP the "gold standard" is now "against it", she calls herself the most transparent candidate yet won't say zilch about the transcripts, she says Universal Healthcare will never, ever, ever happen but then says it will, #whichhillary, she voted for the iraq war, etc...
Please, just... don't even try to say that she's a progressive. I'll take back my conservative comment about her if that makes you feel better. She's a centrist moderate if anything, but progressive no... she can't have that label. I'm sorry.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)This is what I think of trump too <where is the throw-up icon when you need it>
Pharaoh
(8,209 posts)that are upcoming......
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Much is being posted re the delegates for Clinton in LA are more than the delegates for Bernie in Kansas and Nebraska. Wondering if reverse is true. Curious. Not critical to know.