Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,757 posts)
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 01:02 PM Mar 2016

Design changes make Maine-built ‘stealth’ destroyer less stealthy

Source: Bangor Daily News

BATH, Maine — External masts added to the design of three Bath-built “stealth” destroyers increase the radar profile of the warships, but the new vessels still meet the Navy’s “threshold” for stealth.

A little more than two weeks before the lead ship, the future USS Zumwalt, is scheduled to sail down the Kennebec River for a second round of sea trials, USNI News reported design changes that added a mast and sensor to the outside of the vessels.

“The three ships will position sensors originally designed to be embedded in the ships’ composite deckhouses on a mast positioned on the front of the deck house, with several more sensors on either side of the deck house,” the trade journal reported.

Naval Sea Systems Command told USNI News the ships will still meet minimum requirements for “stealth.”

<more>

Read more: https://bangordailynews.com/2016/03/09/news/midcoast/design-changes-make-maine-built-stealth-destroyer-less-stealthy/?ref=regionstate



ugh
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Design changes make Maine-built ‘stealth’ destroyer less stealthy (Original Post) jpak Mar 2016 OP
who asked for the change? melm00se Mar 2016 #1
7 billion dollars to meet the minimum requirements? PersonNumber503602 Mar 2016 #2

melm00se

(4,990 posts)
1. who asked for the change?
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 02:56 PM
Mar 2016

if the Navy did: shame on the Navy
if the builder did: shame on the builder
if, as the article mentioned, it was legal requirement: was this vetted before implemented as to the implications of the design change?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Design changes make Maine...