Secret Service: We’re not allowing firearms at the Republican National Convention
Source: Washington Post
The Secret Service on Monday quashed the hopes of gun rights advocates who were pushing for the open carry of firearms to be allowed at this summer's Republican National Convention.
An online petition to allow open carry of firearms at the event rapidly gained signatures and attention in the past week, applying pressure to pro-gun Republican officials and presidential contenders to walk the walk when it comes to guns. But on Monday, the Secret Service, said it has decided only to allow law enforcement personnel to carry firearms at the event
"Title 18 United States Code Sections 3056 and 1752, provides the Secret Service authority to preclude firearms from entering sites visited by our protectees, including those located in open-carry states," Secret Service spokesman Robert K. Hoback said in a statement. "Only authorized law enforcement personnel working in conjunction with the Secret Service for a particular event may carry a firearm inside of the protected site."
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/28/more-than-42000-people-have-signed-a-petition-to-allow-guns-at-the-republican-national-convention/
tabasco
(22,974 posts)and her freedoms?
mnhtnbb
(31,374 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)That's what republicans and gun nuts say.
mnhtnbb
(31,374 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,703 posts)Duppers
(28,117 posts)liberal N proud
(60,332 posts)What about the loonies 2nd Amendment Rights?
NCjack
(10,279 posts)nailed it
RecoveringJournalist
(148 posts)They protect that Liberal, America-hatin', Constitution-destroyin', Kenyan, Usurper! What more do you expect from obvious COMMIES!
Paladin
(28,243 posts)They_Live
(3,224 posts)Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Jerry442
(1,265 posts)Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)The shootout between the Trump supporters and Cruz supporters could have been spectacular. And it may have done a little to help cleanse the gene pool.
beastie boy
(9,234 posts)Well, one out of two would still have been refreshing!
jmowreader
(50,528 posts)They're not patriots and, except for Trump and Cruz, none of them qualify as tyrants either. Unless you're going to amend that shit to "the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots, tyrants and total assholes," you'll simply have to let them be.
beastie boy
(9,234 posts)that the tree of liberty might vigorously object to being refreshed with the blood of total assholes.
jmowreader
(50,528 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)in large roving armed packs? On a completely unrelated topic; any good bars near the convention hall?
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,703 posts)dbackjon
(6,578 posts)Aristus
(66,289 posts)Poor babies...
spin
(17,493 posts)I have no problem with leaving my gun at home in the safe or in my car while I am attending a gathering that has adequate armed security.
If a incident were to happen that involved an armed attacker I am more than willing to let trained security handle it. If a number of civilians pulled their weapons it would only complicate matters exponentially.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)I shudder to think what might have happened. Even I don't hate Republicans that much.
On a more serious note, I witnessed the aftermath of some asshole who managed to get his hands on a gun: one dead 15 year old kid. This at a Metro station in DC, in broad daylight. There was apparently an argument and the hothead pulled out his gun and shot.
Before you ask whether the gun was legal or not, I'll say that I don't give a rat's ass whether it was or not. I don't think it makes a damn bit of difference. Lots of people are capable of being hotheads, legal gun owners or not.
sinkingfeeling
(51,438 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,347 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,628 posts)as a bloodbath. At least that's what NRA honks are constantly preaching on Facebook.
liberal N proud
(60,332 posts)It could be very dangerous.
Nancyswidower
(182 posts)First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...this might end up like the Bundy Ranch in Cleveland...daring the SS to appropriate their "freedom"...
Tab
(11,093 posts)That pretty much clears the Republican slate right there.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Barrel Room, has been postponed due to constitutional difficulties. Please contact Koch Bros Tickets for refunds or rescheduling.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Why not having them at the RNC but having them in schools?
ffr
(22,665 posts)Just what every republican congregation needs, loaded AK-47s.
beastie boy
(9,234 posts)Wake up, America!
npk
(3,660 posts)Republicans actually thought this was a good idea. Just shows how far from reality they have fallen.
Turbineguy
(37,291 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:40 PM - Edit history (1)
right fucking now!
It is of course the rational course of action. Unstable people and guns don't mix well.
paleotn
(17,884 posts)...Kung Fu fighting....
lark
(23,061 posts)They do not walk the talk. They want school kids to have guns, everyone everywhere, to have guns, and have them out in the open. Yet when it comes to one of their own conventions, well they are happy to have the Secret Service take the heat for them. Too bad, was looking forward to the show. No reason to watch now.
man of few w
(55 posts)The Service should withdraw and let the GOP police itself inside the convention hall.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)But they draw the line at the convention.
IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)Trump and Cruz should turn down their secret service protection immediately! They should stand up for the second amendment!
Kaleva
(36,249 posts)Firestorm49
(4,030 posts)Too bad. I was hoping for a duel between Cruz and Trump at the convention. Oh well.