Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:58 AM
Liberal_in_LA (44,397 posts)
Gun shaped like smartphone allows firearm owners to ‘carry your pistol with you on any occasion’
Source: Nydaily
new two-shot handgun made to look like a smartphone will help owners of the .380-caliber gun pack heat “on any occasion,” according to its inventors. The Ideal Conceal pistol, which is slated to go on sale for $395 later this year, allows its owner to “carry with confidence, conceal in style,” the Minnesota startup’s website reads. The product could be seen on the site with an unfolding handle revealing a trigger and muzzles for the bullets where earphones would usually plug in. Ideal Conceal CEO Kirk Kjellberg told the Daily News the lightweight invention aids gun owners hoping to avoid a Second Amendment debate. Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/smartphone-shaped-gun-helps-owners-carry-occasion-article-1.2580536 http://idealconceal.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/gun1. ![]() ![]()
|
49 replies, 4722 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Liberal_in_LA | Mar 2016 | OP |
longship | Mar 2016 | #1 | |
Skittles | Mar 2016 | #2 | |
keithbvadu2 | Mar 2016 | #3 | |
Helen Borg | Mar 2016 | #23 | |
beergood | Mar 2016 | #4 | |
DRoseDARs | Mar 2016 | #5 | |
Hulk | Mar 2016 | #6 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | Mar 2016 | #7 | |
olddad56 | Mar 2016 | #8 | |
Lucky Luciano | Mar 2016 | #14 | |
Blue_Tires | Mar 2016 | #39 | |
C Moon | Mar 2016 | #9 | |
davidthegnome | Mar 2016 | #10 | |
Turbineguy | Mar 2016 | #11 | |
DetlefK | Mar 2016 | #12 | |
Elmer S. E. Dump | Mar 2016 | #49 | |
Cobalt Violet | Mar 2016 | #13 | |
Sunlei | Mar 2016 | #15 | |
FailureToCommunicate | Mar 2016 | #26 | |
bemildred | Mar 2016 | #16 | |
Sancho | Mar 2016 | #17 | |
moonbabygo | Mar 2016 | #18 | |
Locrian | Mar 2016 | #19 | |
Ford_Prefect | Mar 2016 | #20 | |
Judi Lynn | Mar 2016 | #47 | |
romanic | Mar 2016 | #21 | |
ileus | Mar 2016 | #22 | |
Hoyt | Mar 2016 | #31 | |
Vinca | Mar 2016 | #24 | |
FailureToCommunicate | Mar 2016 | #25 | |
Bernardo de La Paz | Mar 2016 | #27 | |
Fast Walker 52 | Mar 2016 | #28 | |
Dustlawyer | Mar 2016 | #29 | |
Darb | Mar 2016 | #30 | |
keithbvadu2 | Mar 2016 | #41 | |
ProfessorGAC | Mar 2016 | #32 | |
kentauros | Mar 2016 | #33 | |
JoeyT | Mar 2016 | #34 | |
vkkv | Mar 2016 | #43 | |
JoeyT | Mar 2016 | #45 | |
vkkv | Mar 2016 | #46 | |
JoeyT | Mar 2016 | #48 | |
mark67 | Mar 2016 | #35 | |
MillennialDem | Mar 2016 | #36 | |
Cassiopeia | Mar 2016 | #38 | |
Cassiopeia | Mar 2016 | #37 | |
RobinA | Mar 2016 | #40 | |
vkkv | Mar 2016 | #42 | |
alcina | Mar 2016 | #44 |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:05 AM
longship (40,416 posts)
1. Perfect! Just what everybody needs. MOAR GUNZ!!!
And by all means, let's make them hide able.
Can I get a silencer for that? And is it available in a high velocity version? Only two shots? What if I want to kill MOAR??? GUNZ. GUNZ!!!! A Ha Ha Ha Ha HAAAAA ! |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:11 AM
Skittles (147,700 posts)
2. paranoid cowards
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:49 AM
keithbvadu2 (30,091 posts)
3. GOP convention?
Second Amendment rights.
|
Response to keithbvadu2 (Reply #3)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:27 AM
Helen Borg (3,963 posts)
23. Yup yup!
Everybody should take one there!
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:50 AM
beergood (470 posts)
4. these types of firearms aren't new
check this one out
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:50 AM
DRoseDARs (6,810 posts)
5. Cellphone guns? Been around for over a decade.
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:55 AM
Hulk (6,699 posts)
6. Should they EVER catch one of these at airports....
...they need to jail the suckers up and throw away the damned key. This is outrageous!
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:58 AM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
7. Thus giving cops the right to shoot anyone with a phone.
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #7)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:07 AM
olddad56 (5,732 posts)
8. that was my first reaction to this.
Now a kid pulls out a cell phone and the cop can say, I thought he was pulling out a gun.
|
Response to olddad56 (Reply #8)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:47 AM
Lucky Luciano (10,993 posts)
14. They already do that. nt
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #7)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:46 AM
Blue_Tires (55,445 posts)
39. Just black folks, naturally...
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:12 AM
C Moon (11,215 posts)
9. From smart phone to dumb gun.
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:15 AM
davidthegnome (2,983 posts)
10. Huh...
Just wait until they come out with smartphones that are actually guns and smartphones. Just think, to be able to tweet and facebook from the convenient location of your nearest shooting range. To be able to talk to your spouse on the phone while out grocery shopping - while still being ready to defend yourself at a moment's notice.
I guess this stuff is pretty common... and, I think people are scared. I think the number of guns in this Country - and the popularity of the NRA and the constant gun promotion and so on... I think it's a sign, not that we're tough, but that we're afraid. |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:17 AM
Turbineguy (35,643 posts)
11. That's a great idea!
A better chance to shoot somebody and more people to get shot. They should bring out a model for children that looks like a popsicle.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:19 AM
DetlefK (16,318 posts)
12. How can I say it politely? ... It's cheaper than buying a big sports-car.
Response to DetlefK (Reply #12)
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 09:35 AM
Elmer S. E. Dump (5,751 posts)
49. Small dick syndrome?
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:27 AM
Cobalt Violet (9,849 posts)
13. Now cops will justify shooting anyone with a smartphone.
![]() |
Response to Cobalt Violet (Reply #13)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:49 AM
Sunlei (22,651 posts)
15. police already shoot people with 'something' in their hand
Response to Cobalt Violet (Reply #13)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:59 AM
FailureToCommunicate (13,289 posts)
26. +1
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:58 AM
bemildred (90,061 posts)
16. Wear them on a lanyard around your neck.
Don't forget to loosen the lanyard when you need to shoot.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:09 AM
Sancho (8,809 posts)
17. "Please put electronic devices in airplane mode and unload until the pilot turns off the sign"
![]() |
Response to Sancho (Reply #17)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:30 AM
moonbabygo (281 posts)
18. LOL
This is not funny, but I couldn't help but laugh at your comment. All I could think of was that movie Airplane and everyone unloading their guns at once.
On a serious note and I haven't read most threads, more people will die. All a cop or person (in some states) has to say, "I thought his/her phone was a gun....... |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:34 AM
Locrian (4,485 posts)
19. you'll shoot your eye out kid
![]() |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:46 AM
Ford_Prefect (6,948 posts)
20. The newest coolest way to shoot your mouth off!
Response to Ford_Prefect (Reply #20)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:27 PM
Judi Lynn (155,216 posts)
47. Outstanding observation. n/t
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:56 AM
romanic (2,841 posts)
21. This is not a good idea!
D:
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:01 AM
ileus (15,396 posts)
22. My LCP and a pocket holster works much better.
Response to ileus (Reply #22)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:23 AM
Hoyt (54,770 posts)
31. Thanks for the tip, but most of us don't need a gun in our pocket, or want one in
the pockets of paranoid yahoos walking down our streets.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:51 AM
Vinca (49,022 posts)
24. This should be illegal. A gun should look like a gun.
A gun that looks like a phone puts everyone with a phone at risk if they're stopped by a cop for anything.
|
Response to Vinca (Reply #24)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 06:57 AM
FailureToCommunicate (13,289 posts)
25. Excellent point!
We'll be talking about the problem of "cell phone use while Black" soon.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:18 AM
Bernardo de La Paz (44,175 posts)
27. There will be blood on their hands. . . nt
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:18 AM
Fast Walker 52 (7,723 posts)
28. what could POSSIBLY go wrong???
![]() ![]() |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:19 AM
Dustlawyer (10,307 posts)
29. How many kids are going to be playing in mommy' purse to play games on her phone
and play Russian Roulette instead?
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:20 AM
Darb (2,807 posts)
30. They should make one shaped like a dick.
Those would sell like hotcakes.
|
Response to Darb (Reply #30)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:11 AM
keithbvadu2 (30,091 posts)
41. The Bundy militia would love it.
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:26 AM
ProfessorGAC (56,758 posts)
32. Clearly, This Is What The Framers Envisioned
Just like how Scalia could go back in time to read their minds, they were all capable of time vision and knew there would be cellphones and we could make guns that looked like one.
Fits perfectly in with the concept of the 2nd amendment. ![]() |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:34 AM
kentauros (29,414 posts)
33. I'm curious what the CEO means, exactly, by this quote:
Ideal Conceal CEO Kirk Kjellberg told the Daily News the lightweight invention aids gun owners hoping to avoid a Second Amendment debate.
"Avoid" in what way, exactly? |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:45 AM
JoeyT (6,785 posts)
34. I don't think they're going to sell a whole lot of these.
Guns hidden in regular objects have been a thing for hundreds of years now, and they're basically a niche market that no one else gives cares about.
Law abiding owners won't want them because part of being "law abiding" is not sneaking your piece into places you're not allowed to have one. Spree killers won't want them because two shots of a .380 out of a weapon of questionable accuracy is just enough to get everyone's attention before you get your ass beat. Self defense purchasers won't want them because no one is going to let you take a five minute break to get your gun all set up to shoot. It's a novelty gun. No one but collectors and idiots are going to want them. |
Response to JoeyT (Reply #34)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:51 AM
vkkv (3,384 posts)
43. Perhaps, but enough idiots are going to want them to make it a dangerous situation for
some undeserving soul.
These should be illegal IMO. |
Response to vkkv (Reply #43)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:30 PM
JoeyT (6,785 posts)
45. To be honest, they're less dangerous than a regular gun.
I mean, a regular handgun you have to pull it out and it's ready to shoot, has more bullets, and magazines are easily changeable. This thing everyone is going to stare at the dipshit trying to make his cell phone transform just to be able to fire 2 shots.
I don't disagree with you that they should be illegal. They don't serve a legitimate need, (As I mentioned, it's a stupid weapon for self defense, even spree killers wouldn't want it, and anyone trying to hunt with a 2 shot .380 handgun shouldn't be allowed to own firearms.) and could serve several illegitimate ones. About the only two demographics that would want something like this are huge nerds (As a nerd, I say that with love.) or people who are desperate to be armed when the people around them aren't or aren't expecting someone to be armed. I'm ok with the former being prevented from owning a collectible if it keeps them out of the hands of the latter. I bet within the first ten of these being sold some moron will either get arrested trying to bring one on a plane or get arrested after bragging on twitter about getting one on a plane. |
Response to JoeyT (Reply #45)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:36 PM
vkkv (3,384 posts)
46. Geeez, where did I say I-Guns were MORE dangerous? Don't put words in my mouth or
imagine something different than what I said.
Having to UNFOLD it before you can shoot it? It's more likely to hit a by-stander.. I'll quote myself, "an undeserving soul". Ease off, bud. |
Response to vkkv (Reply #46)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:04 PM
JoeyT (6,785 posts)
48. I was actually agreeing with you.
I think pretty much whoever this hits is going to be an undeserving soul. That's what I meant by what they're for.
Edit: Although now that I think about it, the unfolding part is kind of funny. As a person that can't set a mouse trap without it closing on my hands three times, I have a feeling if I owned one of these and ever tried to use it on someone, it'd end up being a "One bullet for me, one for you" kind of situation. ![]() |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:10 AM
mark67 (196 posts)
35. Much ado aout nothing...
As someone previously posted, these types of devices have been around for a long time. At a recent gun show they were selling a 2 shot pistol that had the size and dimensions of a folding pocket knife.
I actually don't worry about these types of devices. They aren't very accurate and really meet the true definition of a 1-2 shot last resort, close range defensive weapon. I worry about assault rifles in the hands of untrained and emotionally unstable people. |
Response to mark67 (Reply #35)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:29 AM
MillennialDem (2,367 posts)
36. I'm actually more worried about hand guns in the hands of emotionally unstable people - this
device aside for reasons you said).
Most of the time it's not rifles or shotguns used in mass shootings or criminal assaults, it's handguns. I don't know if banning handguns would dramatically reduce the problem or if criminals would just switch over to long guns and if we should ban those too. I think most of the people screaming about any gun bans being wrong (even for the mentally ill) are in fact mentally ill themselves. |
Response to mark67 (Reply #35)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:16 AM
Cassiopeia (2,603 posts)
38. Weapons that aren't very accurate
tend to be the most dangerous kind.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:15 AM
Cassiopeia (2,603 posts)
37. Coming soon to every venue where firearms are currently prohibited.
America, Fuck yeah!
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:10 AM
RobinA (9,216 posts)
40. So Now When
the police shoot someone for reaching for their cell phone they can honestly say they feared for their lives. Not to mention that anybody with a cell phone is liable to be shot by a person with a gun, who can then claim self defense. This has to be one of the stupidest ideas ever.
|
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:49 AM
vkkv (3,384 posts)
42. Shouldn't these be ILLEGAL? Come on Congress
DO YOUR JOB !! |
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:49 PM
alcina (602 posts)
44. Well, if they'd put the gun in one of THESE phones
then taking our shoes off at the airport might finally make some sense.
![]() |