Oil train derails near Mosier in Columbia River Gorge
Source: Oregonian
A multi-car oil train derailment in the Columbia River Gorge Friday near Mosier sent up a massive plume of black smoke and stoked long-standing fears about the risks of hauling crude oil through one of the Pacific Northwest's most renowned landmarks.
Justin Jacobs, a Union Pacific spokesman, said the derailed train was operated by his company.
Read more: http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2016/06/oil_train_derails_near_hood_ri.html
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,378 posts)A train fire in the Columbia River Gorge has evacuated schools in the nearby town of Mosier and shut down Interstate 84 between Hood River and The Dalles. (KATU News)
By KATU News
Published: June 3, 2016, 1:30 PM
MOSIER, Ore. A train fire in the Columbia River Gorge has evacuated schools in the nearby town of Mosier and shut down Interstate 84 between Hood River and The Dalles.
Students are being taken to Wahtonka campus in The Dalles. Parents living in the area can pick up their students from that location; the district is scheduling buses for the remaining students.
Witnesses sent in a video that shows a large plume of smoke rising from the train tracks near Mosier, which is located off I-84 east of Hood River. The video shows what appears to be an oil train derailment.
Oregon Dept. of Transportation spokesperson Peter Murphey confirmed that two train cars are on fire, however he said it is too early to confirm any more details. ... This is a developing story, updates will be posted as information comes in.
Gore1FL
(21,126 posts)25 years ago that train would have been headed towards my work order desk.
wallyworld2
(375 posts)From Hood River OR, wind surfing, Para sailing and X games.
Wtf are these rolling black oil bombs going down this national monument?
wallyworld2
(375 posts)The view along that stretch of road is just stunning. Especially at sunrise and sunset
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)While it's inevitable such an event has occurred and likely will do so with much more frequency, as an Oregonian dedicated to preserving our environment, I can only say--damn! And curses on those who cause these "accidents" with no regard for the afternath.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Does it make sense to anyone that we are shipping our coal to China?
StarTrombone
(188 posts)Some people's livelihoods rely on coal
You know JOBS
Not coffee servers
And after today's job numbers they're damned lucky to have them
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)is no one involved in this decision that cares about American jobs. Corporations are raping our land and selling our coal to make a quick buck. Very few jobs rely on the export of coal.
StarTrombone
(188 posts)And it needs a market
If the EPA is going to shut down that market here it's going to go somewhere
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Natural gas is now cheaper than coal to run power plants, and it is easier (and cheaper) to convert a coal fired power plant into a gas fired plant than it is to put in the tech needed to clean up the process .
The industry is dying, and the only solution is to start retraining the people in it.
wallyworld2
(375 posts)sorefeet
(1,241 posts)the man power is pretty minimal to mine coal, especially pit mines like coal strip Montana. I worked a lot of coal fired power plants across America. They are poison. I pay close attention to the train traffic through this valley and coal transport is the slowest I have seen. Lots and lots of coal cars are side tracked. The market is slowing big time. I rent and I have a coal furnace in the basement but I refuse to use it any more because it is so filthy. To my house and my lungs. People better jump on the GREEN wagon because it is the future.
trudyco
(1,258 posts)One kind is one that pays fairly decently.
And the other is one that pays fairly decently and doesn't hurt the world.
I think we need to focus on the latter. To say we need to keep doing things that hurt the planet because closing the industry down would affect jobs is a very Republican thing to say.
I prefer a government program to retrain all workers with guaranteed equal salary and benefits in the renewable energy sector is the kind of good jobs we need to invest in. That's a very Democrat way of thinking.
beardown
(363 posts)If you think no jobs is bad wait until there is no air.
In all likelihood, there would be more jobs if companies had to produce their products and services in sustainable way. Also, the true cost of goods and services would be attached to the actual goods and services as opposed to the situation now where coal companies get to price their product largely without paying for the deaths and illnesses that their product produces. Why should my kids get lung cancer from coal fired plants in China burning American coal and then be stuck with the bills and economic consequences while the coal companies use their extra wealth to buy more legislators and lobbyists?
It's the whole privatize profits and socialize costs model.
Quite frankly, when companies play the jobs card it's literally economic extortion. Union? We'll take your jobs. Safety regs? We'll take your jobs. Pollution? We'll take your jobs.
trudyco
(1,258 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)I date back to the 40s. If we are going to move away from fossil fuels we are going to have to do it soon and we are going to have to start figuring out how to couple the jobs with alternative fuels.
We need to get serious about alternatives so that accidents like this do not happen. Think how far we would be on alternative fuels if we had started in the 40s or even the 50s when people started telling us about climate change. IF we do not start now - when?
StarTrombone
(188 posts)And if the screwball anti-nuclear ninnies hadn't thrown their little tantrums we might be energy independent by now
But no, some would have us rely on magic mirrors, pinwheels and fairy dust
All of which don't put a dent in our power needs and likely never really will
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Blame the failure of nukes on the ninnies? Heh.
No, sport, the banks who were asked to loan money to build nuke plants said NO. They said NO because they crunched the numbers and reality, and it told them the return on nukes would be below zero.
Fukushima in Japan will cost over a trillion dollars and never be cleaned up. The bankers saw that coming.
However, the bankers are investing in wind, solar and other alternatives.
So who's the ninnie now?
But I thought Germany actually did one whole day or evening of just renewable energy. It was a Sunday so lower energy but still... I thought they achieved full energy needs met via pinwheels and fairy dust.
Also, wasn't there some research going on to create nuclear energy that doesn't have nasty by-products that never die? If we spent as much money on research into renewable energy as we do on Cancer, or weight loss....
Tikki
(14,556 posts)every citizen allowed nuclear waste to be buried in their yard.
Tikki
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Yeah, I didn't think so.
Nuclear is not safe until we find a way to use it without the endless waste that we have no safe way of storing or handling.
I do live downstream from a leaky old nuke site (Hanford) and comments like yours really piss me off.
StarTrombone
(188 posts)Just outside of Phoenix
It's this county's and possibly the world's, largest Nuclear power plant
It sits out in the middle of a desert and is cooled by waste water from the Phoenix Metro area
It's been operating since the 1980's and keeps my AC bill reasonable
http://mms.businesswire.com/media/20130503006144/en/359294/5/PV_Site_Aerial_Photo_(02-22-13).jpg
As for waste:
Someday we'll be mining that waste for its energy.
And people who belittle the potential of Nuclear Energy really piss me off
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Here we have it leaching into ground water in Washinton, and The Columbia River, which happens to affect Oregon too. Not safe and not cool. Neither is energy derived from oil, coal or natural gas. We need to fix it all.
How nice to only be concerned with yourself and how it helps keep your energy costs down. I happen to want to keep our planet, and ground water and air clean, and there are better and safter ways to use natural green energy that do not produce all that toxic waste.
If you want to find a way to use that waste...go for it. It's buried all over this country, and leaching into the ground water everywhere.
How about we clean up our existing mess, instead of adding to it?
Where you live, you should all be using solar instead. It's ridiculous to live in a place like Arizona and not have a ton of solar providing most of your energy.
Tikki
(14,556 posts)We have been to the moon, traveled to pluto, developed the personal computer, cured polio and nearly eradicated many childhood
diseases and we are still on 'SOMEDAY' with the nuclear waste.
If you think you are pissed off, try the families down wind and near Hanford.
Tikki
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)oil has to be used to make the plants, how much water? Do you know that no one will insure the plants? And the clean up if you have an accident makes it not worth the risk. Other countries don't have the "anti-nuclear ninnies" as you so childishly call them and they are moving away from nuc. Germany dumped nuclear.
StarTrombone
(188 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)The risks of a nuclear disaster is beyond our comprehension. And we must consider the cost of closing down a nuclear plant. Someday that will have to happen. The overall cost is more than the energy gain.
StarTrombone
(188 posts)An analysis in Scientific American?
Or a poster on DU?
No doubt in my mind
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)The building of a nuclear plant requires a tremendous amount of power. I didn't see how long it would take to break even. And then of course there is the cost of closing the plant which will happen someday and at an unbelievable cost. That isn't factored into the cost of the plant but should be. Also ignored in the studies is the cost of an accident. They happen and the cost needs to be factored in. Your article was very one sided.
FighttheFuture
(1,313 posts)The costs are astronomical and are never recovered and left on the backs of the taxpayers and the resultant waste if far to toxic for way too long to even bother tolerating.
There are better options, especially today.
FighttheFuture
(1,313 posts)provide for these phased out industries a guaranteed income with retraining, or help starting some other line of work.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Or the Columbia River.
I live in the gorge, but am not close enough to the river to have to deal with the dust. It is an issue we'd like to resolve...like no more coal trains coming through here at all?
Please some day let that happen.
I will have to keep my eyes on this train fire issue. I hope oil cannot leak into the river.
Mosier is upstream of Hood River, which is busy with people playing in the water now...that could be awful for the summer tourist season.
Shit shit shit!
We don't want coal trains and we certainly don't want crude oil coming through here either.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)I hope someday soon people will realize excavating and creating channels for flammable materials is not a good idea while the Earth surface is heating up.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,968 posts)trudyco
(1,258 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)We need to get off the oil!
elljay
(1,178 posts)the Republican response to this will be to build that pipeline! Never mind that pipelines also have accidents....
Punx
(446 posts)Die by the oil,
Or more specifically, fossil fuels.
Tikki
(14,556 posts)when we head up that way a bit later this Summer?
The Tikkis
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)The bridge in this photo is the Hood River bridge. Hood River is famous for it's wind and kite surfing, because of the strong winds in The Gorge. the beaches you see just this side of the bridge (on the right) is where all the people hang out for the summer water games. That big broad expanse of river that is empty in this photo, is currently packed with people on boards.
?b3f6a5d7692ccc373d56e40cf708e3fa67d9af9d
As you can see from the top pic, if the oil leaks into the river, it could have some serious effect on the summer games. I think it's amazing that the train derailed where it did. A quarter mile earlier or later and those cars would have been in the river.
As you can see by this picture here:
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)But I know they are bringing in special foam units, so maybe that will help.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I think this is one of the biggest traffic disasters we've had in The Gorge for some time. Last one this bad was the '96 floods.