Video suggests police drove at California man they then shot
Source: Associated Press
Video suggests police drove at California man they then shot
Sep 30, 8:39 PM EDT
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) -- Dashboard audio indicates two police officers may have tried to hit a homeless man with their police cruiser before fatally shooting him in Sacramento this summer, a newspaper reports.
The Sacramento Bee (http://bit.ly/2dxPf4b) enhanced the audio on videos released by police, including the voices of two officers who shot 50-year-old Joseph Mann July 11.
The officers can be heard saying "I'm gonna hit him" and "OK, go for it" before appearing to drive their cruiser toward Mann. He dodged the car twice. The officers followed on foot and shot him 14 times.
According to the audio, Mann also told officers he did not have a gun, contrary to a 911 report. Police say no gun was found, although they found a knife.
Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_POLICE_SHOOTING_SACRAMENTO?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-09-30-20-39-58
Foggyhill
(1,060 posts)McKim
(2,412 posts)This seems to be a national sport among our police depts. What can we do to get rid of sick cops?
Basement Beat
(659 posts)villianized for not "honoring" and blindly supporting these thugs which are proven to be above the law over and over.
The system this country is built on and embedded in makes me sick.
MrScorpio
(73,630 posts)brush
(53,764 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 1, 2016, 05:09 AM - Edit history (1)
on cops somehow engaging with even armed whites without killing them.
Please keep them coming.
MrScorpio
(73,630 posts)TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)spike jones
(1,678 posts)I am begining to think that there must be some kind of cop club that to get in they have to murder a person with extra points for a black person. It may be like a street gang, that would fit, or a biker gang or a military style club; but I'll bet it is out there somewhere. Since the problem is nation wide it may be on the internet. It would probably be named Blue something...
King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)specifically because the uniform and the badge give them "license" to murder --
a permit to hunt and kill human beings, especially any "type" of human
being which they despise.
That is the type of behavior captured on that recording and depicted in the OP:
two police officers -- men entrusted to protect the lives and safety of the public --
are hunting down and killing a man as if he were an animal.
They probably comprise less than 10% of the law enforcement community, but
the old saying is this: "A police officer is just a sociopath with a badge." It is
not applicable to the majority of police officers. However, the ones who are the
sociopaths gain their infamous notoriety and our appalled attention by these
vile acts.
The advent of cell phone videos and surveillance cameras has brought all of this
evil into the light of day. There are law enforcement officials in the U.S. who are
simply hunting human beings. It has been happening for years, since the
days of the Civil War, but they can't hide or cover-up their crimes anymore.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)...(if they so choose) people who have little or no empathy?
It is also possible to select for strong tendencies toward group loyalty and obedience.
In other words, the idea that "it's a few bad apples" is woefully out of date. They are screening out empathy, initiative and intelligence in favor of group think and numbness.
King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)I have no data as to the personality make-up of those who are "rejected"
from police academies. I assume they identify with an authoritarian view of
the world. That, in and of itself -- is not a bad thing. I also assume that very
few are asked to leave unless the problem is egregious. The need is there,
and few people are willing to take the job due to the risks and dangers that
are inherent to this line of work. You would have to be a little gritty to do this job.
10% is not "a few" people -- that's a lot of people. I choose my words carefully,
as a rule-of-thumb, and try not to over-generalize or use too broad of a brush --
in this case, to not paint all of law enforcement in a negative way nor to minimize
the problem of police violence as just "a few bad apples" which are your words,
not mine. 10% is a fair, unbiased estimate. All one can do is estimate.
How do you know that these academies are "screening out" people, or by what
means (i.e. psych testing) they are doing it? Can you claim for a fact that cadets
are NOT screened in an effort to eliminate those who shows amoral, sadistic or
sociopathic tendencies ? I do not believe that the preferred law enforcement officer
is one who is "numb" or lacking in independent, critical thinking, although I am sure
there are plenty who fit that description. The ones that are sociopathic -- like those
in the OP -- they get noticed.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)By their deeds ye shall know them.
Or old saws...
The proof is in the pudding.
Why wouldn't they select for loyalty and ability to be detached?
If their top priority in an "us vs them" world view - as I'm certain it 90% is - why wouldn't they look first to the group's own internal needs?
Do you know of any large personnel process that doesn't do personality screening of applicants today?
This is well past supposition; it is pretty straightforward deduction.
King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)1) Initiative
2) Sense of Ethics
3) Respect and Knowledge of Laws
4) Communication Skills
5) Common Sense
6) Civility
7) Service Mentality
8) Humility
9) Controlled Temper
10) Thirst for New Knowledge
Numbness and group-think aren't mentioned anywhere.
https://leb.fbi.gov/2014/december/perspective-characteristics-of-an-ideal-police-office
PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING AND THE SELECTION OF POLICE OFFICERS
testing is done to rule out candidates, not rule in candidates.
https://www.corwin.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/19737_Chapter_3.pdf
Do some research before spewing forth. You can't pigeon-hole people like this.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)...around the country.
I'm not inclined to take advice from someone that doesn't understand the difference between opinion and deduction. If those traits were guiding officer selection, the problems we observe would not be present.
ETA: I'm rejecting your view that the problem is limited to about 10% of the people because they have pathological tendencies and aren't being weeded out. If that were true, then the problem would be self correcting as the 90% that meet the FBI's desired profile (you posted) acted in the public interest to eject those unsuited to the job.
That isn't what's happening, is it?
King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)There is nothing out there that backs up your assertions.
You stick to your guns, though. Keep shooting blanks.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Last edited Fri Oct 7, 2016, 02:21 AM - Edit history (1)
You sound very very desperate to relieve that cognitive dissonance that's hammering on your brain and blinding you to the obvious. So allow me to repeat:
That isn't what's happening, is it?
Well, it isn't, is it?
Retired George
(332 posts)BULL. SHIT!
King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)Totally distorted misinterpretation. Thanks
See above response I made to same ignorant reply by another poster.
10% is no little number of people. They try to screen them out, but obviously
can't. Read the links. Do some research instead of going solely by opinions.
And thanks for missing the main point, which is that I believe there are cops who
are HUNTING HUMAN BEINGS. Not exactly an apologist ????
Retired George
(332 posts)Lay off the weed, bro: it makes you paranoid.
Judi Lynn
(160,516 posts)Welcome to D.U., Retired George!