Bob Dylan's Nobel silence 'impolite and arrogant' - Nobel committee member
Source: BBC
Bob Dylan's failure to acknowledge his Nobel Prize in literature is "impolite and arrogant", according to a member of the body that awards it.
The 75-year-old singer was named the shock winner of the prize last week.
But all efforts by the Swedish Academy to contact him have failed, and he has not acknowledged the win in public.
Academy member Per Wastberg told Swedish television: "He is who he is," adding that there was little surprise Dylan had ignored the news.
"We were aware that he can be difficult and that he does not like appearances when he stands alone on the stage," he told Sweden's Dagens Nyheter newspaper in a separate interview.
A reference to the prize was removed from Dylan's website last week.
It is still not known if he will travel to Stockholm to receive the prize on 10 December. If he does not, a ceremony marking his career will go ahead as planned, Mr Wastberg said.
Mr Wastberg called the snub "unprecedented", but one person has previously rejected the Nobel Prize in Literature - French author and philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre in 1964.
http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-37740379
Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-37740379
If you don't to accept, just decline
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)He is not in hiding. He is on a concert tour, Colbert included him in his remarks. He stated he does not want to be recognized as the "voice" for any party. He is an artist, doesn't need the money or fame.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)He probably does his music for the same reason. Maybe some of the recordings are later polished to generate sales, but more over it was what he wanted to do and maybe say. You cannot get more authentic.
So you would want him to just give it up and say how wonderful it all is?
Bob Dylan The Times They Are A Changin' 1964
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Javaman
(62,517 posts)many people are like that.
Dylan can do whatever he pleases.
Response to Javaman (Reply #4)
athena This message was self-deleted by its author.
Retired George
(332 posts)But hey, maybe I'm biased, because I've always thought he was overrated.
Javaman
(62,517 posts)he honestly doesn't give a shit what people think.
And that's they way I like him.
And quite frankly, if given the same award, I would probably do the same thing.
Response to Javaman (Reply #55)
athena This message was self-deleted by its author.
Javaman
(62,517 posts)doesn't always mean they want to be found.
It's the people looking that want to find them.
it's the sort of thing can be applied here.
He doesn't care for awards nor acknowledges them.
I feel the same, I have been the recipient of awards in my life but never showed to accept them. Why? Just because other people think I'm deserving, that lessens the other people out there who are equally or more deserving work than I.
That's why I believe awards are more about the people giving them than the people whom are to accept them.
And to go of on a tangent, this dovetails very nicely into another artist who wrote a song called Imagine.
He wrote of a world were people were accepted for who they are and about a brotherhood of people.
That means no awards as well.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)moonscape
(4,673 posts)be polite and gracious. We aren't polite and gracious for approval, but because as human beings in an inter-dependent society it's the right thing to do.
I agree with you that the increased rudeness in American society is jarring. And my friends and I have often spoken about being glad we grew up when we did, when courtesy and civility were far more common.
athena
(4,187 posts)One should care how others feel, even if one doesn't care what they think (i.e., one is not necessarily seeking their approval). There is no point in treating people in a hurtful way that makes them feel stupid or foolish. As my mother-in-law, who just passed away, taught my husband, manners are not just rules about which utensils to hold in which hand; they are, at bottom, about making others feel comfortable. It's sad that this considerate and empathetic way of thinking and behaving is fast becoming old-fashioned.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)"he's not there."
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Obama's "Peace Prize" and how that's turned out. Maybe Dylan doesn't give a award much credence.
jacksonian
(736 posts)i love Dylan, but he's only acted this way his entire life, so who's surprised?
You want to honor the lyrics, honor the lyrics (they richly deserve it), but expecting this man to kiss your ass in gratitude is pretty silly. He is who he is and always been, what did they expect?
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)"Here, have one of the highest profile honors in existence."
"Thanks." or "Not my thing really."
"Hey nice ass kissing there you sycophantic oleaginous toady."
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)indicates how unnecessary it is for him to just politely decline the honor.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Seems arrogant to tell people how they should behave when they are given an award that they did not ask for or seek.
still_one
(92,134 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)He doesn't want an honor in the name of an explosives inventor, or whatever.
It's not like anyone is at their beck and call.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Brady Theatre if they want to call...LOL
no_hypocrisy
(46,080 posts)He doesn't care how it's interpreted.
elmac
(4,642 posts)pulling in 96 million dollars last year he probably thinks its not worth his time or energy.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)In 2012, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by PBO:
According to Wikipedia, he's also accepted the National Medal of Arts, the Kennedy Center Honors and a special Pulitzer, along with others. (And, of course, 12 Grammys, and several music halls of fame.)
So, who knows. Maybe he's not interested in participating in the formal proceedings that the Nobels have.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)To say they are Bob's friend.
When he was down they just stood there grinnin'!
So anyway, what took them so long??? 50+ years. Given those circumstances, at least they could give him a week or three to take notice!
Wibly
(613 posts)Dylan is an artist. Many artist brain don't work in the same fashion other's do.
Chances are Dylan doesn't know what to say, or is still processing.
Leave him to it.
All this negative bs just speaks to those who are spouting it.
Dylan is being Dylan. Let him be Dylan.
DinahMoeHum
(21,783 posts). . .and have a little patience, for a change.
Dylan is not the kind of guy who jumps up and kisses on command.
Leontius
(2,270 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,369 posts)Good argument for that in the link:
Popular music is such an endeavor too, but, for the most part, it already receives the recognition it deserves. And apart from a few spoken-word awards, no one would expect the highest honors in music to go to a writer we wont be seeing Zadie Smith or Mary Gaitskill in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame....
Much as I like Dylan, song lyrics are not literature.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I never saw the appeal. I just think a lot of other much more talented literary artists were cheated this time around.
msongs
(67,394 posts)kissed and the recipients grovelling at their feet
mulsh
(2,959 posts)yourselves.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,338 posts)Maybe they should give a prize to Justin Bieber, see how that turns out.
madaboutharry
(40,207 posts)He has never been accused of being gracious.
On edit: There is an acknowledgment still up on his Facebook page. So who knows with him.
Nitram
(22,791 posts)I've read a couple of biographies about Dylan, and this is not at all surprising. But he could still be contemplating a surprise. He's nothing if not predictable.
DeltaLitProf
(769 posts). . . money made from selling bombing technology!?!
Nitram
(22,791 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 25, 2016, 08:53 AM - Edit history (1)
Dynamite can in no way be considered a "bombing technology."
It was invented to make mining safer as Nobel's brother got killed in a nitroglycerin accident.
They were using explosives in mining all over the world and he was looking for a way to make it safer to handle without people getting killed every day.
Nitram
(22,791 posts)Very safe and stable.
LakeArenal
(28,817 posts)He' s an artiste so he's temperamental. At least he didn't cut his ear off over it or anything. Still, a simple thank you, from the man with a million lyrics, might have been nice.
ananda
(28,858 posts)He is a pretty genuine person.
Oneironaut
(5,492 posts)Let's be honest - most highly creative people are also very quirky. It's not a bad thing. He was offered the award and doesn't want it. Leave the poor guy alone.
Response to Oneironaut (Reply #30)
athena This message was self-deleted by its author.
Oneironaut
(5,492 posts)I guess we'll never know. I think bugging someone to accept an award is equally rude. He probably should have said something, but maybe he doesn't feel like he should have to. Who knows?
Response to Oneironaut (Reply #44)
athena This message was self-deleted by its author.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)ghostsinthemachine
(3,569 posts)the Nobel prize is a yearly thing and he hasn't done anything in the past year, except release a cover album of Sinatra songs and an album too new to consider , to warrant the prize, and he knows it. An empty plaudit if there ever was one (Sort of like Obama winning the Peace prize, when he did nothing to warrant the award). A lifetime achievement award the Nobel is not.
This does shine a light on the sorry state of literature today however.
Response to ghostsinthemachine (Reply #31)
athena This message was self-deleted by its author.
ghostsinthemachine
(3,569 posts)And Bob Dylan.
Response to athena (Reply #35)
athena This message was self-deleted by its author.
nsd
(2,406 posts)It is rarely given for a single book or other piece of work, and it almost never honors work done within the past year.
For example, when V.S. Naipaul won in 2001, the committee cited A House for Mr. Biswas (published 1961), The Loss of El Dorado (1969), The Enigma of Arrival (1987), and several other books. Usually, the prize is given for a whole body of work (a lifetime's worth of work).
In the sciences, the prize is typically given for a single achievement, but that achievement can be decades old. This years's physics prize went for work on phase transitions that dates to the early 1970s.
ghostsinthemachine
(3,569 posts)I didnt know that. Thanks
DeltaLitProf
(769 posts). . . is more of a lifetime achievement. It's not like the Pulitzer or National Book Award in being for a specific work. Not anymore anyway.
tavernier
(12,377 posts)believe in royalty titles and so was not offered, even though his fans often called him Sir Alan. I think it's a matter of choice. Perhaps he feels a Nobel prize puts him above other talented people who are equally deserving.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)after hearing of the award, said to myself: "What took so fucking long?".
Surprised that he doesn't acknowledge?
Not one bit. He's been the poet of generations worldwide.
Criticizing the very people that bemoaning him now.
75 years old, on tour with a number one hit, still writing.
Why do people still find it necessary to find fault with those more successful than themselves?
Rex
(65,616 posts)They can show up and present it to him, he is a public icon after all.
Response to Rex (Reply #45)
athena This message was self-deleted by its author.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Why not just move on? Plenty of other winners.
DeltaLitProf
(769 posts). . . and forget to watch Don't Look Back?
He's trying to love his neighbor and do good to others.
But oh mother things ain't going so well.
LisaM
(27,801 posts)That's his schtick. Is the Prize committee stupid?
dalton99
(781 posts)electron_blue
(3,592 posts)the committee loses credibility
tawadi
(2,110 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)They are full of themselves if they are going to condescend to award-winners.
Honestly, with this public excoriation, they've now turned their prize into a booby - at least for him, because he's filthy rich and doesn't need the $1M prize, and yet if he responded after this insult, he's validating it.
Another thing, you know what? Plenty of people have worked with him, know him, or know members of his entourage, and yet, they generally keep their mouths shut even though he's well-known to have his eccentricities.
What kind of a professional in charge of administering a trust talks like this about trust beneficiaries? I think, in fact, that this Per Wastberg should be replaced, if he did call Dylan arrogant. No call for that kind of talk at all.
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)If he accepts, he is their puppet. If he just blows it off and they get mad, it says a lot more about them than about him.
Response to cbdo2007 (Reply #64)
athena This message was self-deleted by its author.
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)He doesn't owe you or them anything. They gave him the award and he's choosing to be exactly who we all expect him to be, which is why they gave it to him to begin with.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)Check out this:
Jean-Paul Sartre | French philosopher and author | Britannica.com
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jean-Paul-Sartre
Encyclopædia Britannica
Jean-Paul Sartre. Jean-Paul Sartre, (born June 21, 1905, Paris, Francedied April 15, 1980, Paris) French novelist, playwright, and exponent of Existentialisma philosophy acclaiming the freedom of the individual human being. He was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1964, but he declined i
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)because he doesn't
LisaM
(27,801 posts)It's been a while since I saw it, but I remember things like someone asking him something about a song lyric and he answered, "uh, what do you mean by love?" (I can't quite get the sneering sound here). It was just an absolutely silly response, and he obviously hasn't changed, but you'd think the Nobel committee would know this about him and not expect anything more.