Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ansible

(1,718 posts)
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 10:51 AM Oct 2016

Bob Dylan's Nobel silence 'impolite and arrogant' - Nobel committee member

Source: BBC

Bob Dylan's failure to acknowledge his Nobel Prize in literature is "impolite and arrogant", according to a member of the body that awards it.

The 75-year-old singer was named the shock winner of the prize last week.

But all efforts by the Swedish Academy to contact him have failed, and he has not acknowledged the win in public.

Academy member Per Wastberg told Swedish television: "He is who he is," adding that there was little surprise Dylan had ignored the news.

"We were aware that he can be difficult and that he does not like appearances when he stands alone on the stage," he told Sweden's Dagens Nyheter newspaper in a separate interview.

A reference to the prize was removed from Dylan's website last week.

It is still not known if he will travel to Stockholm to receive the prize on 10 December. If he does not, a ceremony marking his career will go ahead as planned, Mr Wastberg said.

Mr Wastberg called the snub "unprecedented", but one person has previously rejected the Nobel Prize in Literature - French author and philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre in 1964.

http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-37740379

Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-37740379

79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bob Dylan's Nobel silence 'impolite and arrogant' - Nobel committee member (Original Post) ansible Oct 2016 OP
I agree LynnTTT Oct 2016 #1
I disagree Lynn saidsimplesimon Oct 2016 #32
He is being who is, an iconic mastermind, that does stuff his way. nolabels Oct 2016 #70
I hope he goes and reads the lyrics from "Masters of War"... n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2016 #2
Or he doesn't care about awards... Javaman Oct 2016 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author athena Oct 2016 #33
Indeed Retired George Oct 2016 #37
because if you know anything about Dylan Javaman Oct 2016 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author athena Oct 2016 #56
it's like the old saying, just because someone is lost Javaman Oct 2016 #61
+1000 smirkymonkey Oct 2016 #65
I think it's possible to not care what people think, and still moonscape Oct 2016 #71
Good point, moonscape. athena Oct 2016 #72
It's always possible... yallerdawg Oct 2016 #5
Maybe he's weighed Plucketeer Oct 2016 #6
so what jacksonian Oct 2016 #7
+1 nt Javaman Oct 2016 #16
+1 prayin4rain Oct 2016 #50
I'm not sure that's what they want whatthehey Oct 2016 #60
I don't think anyone expects him to "kiss their ass in gratitude" and the fact you exaggerate KittyWampus Oct 2016 #79
Arrogant? oberliner Oct 2016 #8
My exact thoughts oberliner still_one Oct 2016 #9
I agree. nt m-lekktor Oct 2016 #18
Yeah, I agree with that jberryhill Oct 2016 #51
He's in Tulsa OK tomorrow OKNancy Oct 2016 #11
Nah, that's just Bob being Bob . . . . . . no_hypocrisy Oct 2016 #12
As one of the highest paid singers in the world elmac Oct 2016 #14
He actually has accepted these kinds of honors in the past... Princess Turandot Oct 2016 #15
They've got a lot of nerve Zambero Oct 2016 #17
What a load Wibly Oct 2016 #19
Dear Swedish Academy - STFU, you simpering little twits. . . DinahMoeHum Oct 2016 #20
What a waste of the Nobel Prize. Leontius Oct 2016 #21
I agree BeyondGeography Oct 2016 #24
Agree treestar Oct 2016 #53
Totally agree. smirkymonkey Oct 2016 #66
a gift recipient is free to use the gift as he chooses. doh! nobel seems to want to have their butts msongs Oct 2016 #22
Dylan and the Nobel committee are certainly getting a lot of attention. discuss among mulsh Oct 2016 #23
I don't understand. Bob Dylan is well known for his manners and humility. JustABozoOnThisBus Oct 2016 #25
It is rude and disappointing. madaboutharry Oct 2016 #26
Maybe they should vet their awardees a bit before bestowing the prize upon them. Nitram Oct 2016 #27
Excuse me but isn't the Nobel Prize funded by . . . DeltaLitProf Oct 2016 #48
No, the inventor of dynamite funded the prize. Nitram Oct 2016 #54
Yep ProfessorGAC Oct 2016 #69
That's right. You can throw dynamite into a fire and it won't explode. Requires a spark. Nitram Oct 2016 #75
Everyone is talking about it so all get notoriety LakeArenal Oct 2016 #28
Dylan never did anything to win a prize. ananda Oct 2016 #29
Maybe he's just an interesting guy who rejects accolades he feels are pointless. Oneironaut Oct 2016 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author athena Oct 2016 #34
Maybe, in his eyes, that would give legitimacy to the award that he doesn't feel is deserved. Oneironaut Oct 2016 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author athena Oct 2016 #68
+1000 smirkymonkey Oct 2016 #47
I think he is embarrased ghostsinthemachine Oct 2016 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author athena Oct 2016 #35
I think you re reading way too much into this ghostsinthemachine Oct 2016 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author athena Oct 2016 #39
The Nobel prize in literature *is* a lifetime achievement award. nsd Oct 2016 #42
Well thanks for the correction ghostsinthemachine Oct 2016 #43
The Nobel in Literature . . . DeltaLitProf Oct 2016 #49
My sweet Alan Rickman did not tavernier Oct 2016 #40
As a great fan of Dylan's... freebrew Oct 2016 #41
I doubt he needs the money. Rex Oct 2016 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author athena Oct 2016 #57
He is not unreachable, they just need to go to him if they really care. Rex Oct 2016 #73
So they give the guy a Nobel Prize DeltaLitProf Oct 2016 #46
Because really? LisaM Oct 2016 #52
Can't take it back now dalton99 Oct 2016 #58
I think their lack of Nobel prize physicists to women in my lifetime is impolite and arrogant electron_blue Oct 2016 #59
People who think he's being arrogant don't understand musicians. nt tawadi Oct 2016 #62
After some reflection, I think if I were him, I'd continue ignoring them. closeupready Oct 2016 #63
It is a weird spot for Dylan, or anybody to be in. cbdo2007 Oct 2016 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author athena Oct 2016 #67
You are missing the point by requiring his response. cbdo2007 Oct 2016 #78
I love how Bob Dylan travels around in small company nolabels Oct 2016 #74
Maybe he's too polite to say he doesn't deserve it Dreamer Tatum Oct 2016 #76
He's always acted this way - ever seen that documentary made about him in the 1960s? LisaM Oct 2016 #77

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
32. I disagree Lynn
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 03:17 PM
Oct 2016

He is not in hiding. He is on a concert tour, Colbert included him in his remarks. He stated he does not want to be recognized as the "voice" for any party. He is an artist, doesn't need the money or fame.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
70. He is being who is, an iconic mastermind, that does stuff his way.
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 04:23 PM
Oct 2016

He probably does his music for the same reason. Maybe some of the recordings are later polished to generate sales, but more over it was what he wanted to do and maybe say. You cannot get more authentic.

So you would want him to just give it up and say how wonderful it all is?

Bob Dylan The Times They Are A Changin' 1964

Response to Javaman (Reply #4)

Javaman

(62,517 posts)
55. because if you know anything about Dylan
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 11:02 PM
Oct 2016

he honestly doesn't give a shit what people think.

And that's they way I like him.

And quite frankly, if given the same award, I would probably do the same thing.

Response to Javaman (Reply #55)

Javaman

(62,517 posts)
61. it's like the old saying, just because someone is lost
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 11:02 AM
Oct 2016

doesn't always mean they want to be found.

It's the people looking that want to find them.

it's the sort of thing can be applied here.

He doesn't care for awards nor acknowledges them.

I feel the same, I have been the recipient of awards in my life but never showed to accept them. Why? Just because other people think I'm deserving, that lessens the other people out there who are equally or more deserving work than I.

That's why I believe awards are more about the people giving them than the people whom are to accept them.

And to go of on a tangent, this dovetails very nicely into another artist who wrote a song called Imagine.

He wrote of a world were people were accepted for who they are and about a brotherhood of people.

That means no awards as well.

moonscape

(4,673 posts)
71. I think it's possible to not care what people think, and still
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 04:38 PM
Oct 2016

be polite and gracious. We aren't polite and gracious for approval, but because as human beings in an inter-dependent society it's the right thing to do.

I agree with you that the increased rudeness in American society is jarring. And my friends and I have often spoken about being glad we grew up when we did, when courtesy and civility were far more common.

athena

(4,187 posts)
72. Good point, moonscape.
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 04:44 PM
Oct 2016

One should care how others feel, even if one doesn't care what they think (i.e., one is not necessarily seeking their approval). There is no point in treating people in a hurtful way that makes them feel stupid or foolish. As my mother-in-law, who just passed away, taught my husband, manners are not just rules about which utensils to hold in which hand; they are, at bottom, about making others feel comfortable. It's sad that this considerate and empathetic way of thinking and behaving is fast becoming old-fashioned.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
6. Maybe he's weighed
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 11:16 AM
Oct 2016

Obama's "Peace Prize" and how that's turned out. Maybe Dylan doesn't give a award much credence.

jacksonian

(736 posts)
7. so what
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 11:22 AM
Oct 2016

i love Dylan, but he's only acted this way his entire life, so who's surprised?

You want to honor the lyrics, honor the lyrics (they richly deserve it), but expecting this man to kiss your ass in gratitude is pretty silly. He is who he is and always been, what did they expect?

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
60. I'm not sure that's what they want
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 09:24 AM
Oct 2016

"Here, have one of the highest profile honors in existence."

"Thanks." or "Not my thing really."

"Hey nice ass kissing there you sycophantic oleaginous toady."

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
79. I don't think anyone expects him to "kiss their ass in gratitude" and the fact you exaggerate
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 08:03 PM
Oct 2016

indicates how unnecessary it is for him to just politely decline the honor.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
8. Arrogant?
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 11:27 AM
Oct 2016

Seems arrogant to tell people how they should behave when they are given an award that they did not ask for or seek.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
51. Yeah, I agree with that
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 02:24 AM
Oct 2016

He doesn't want an honor in the name of an explosives inventor, or whatever.

It's not like anyone is at their beck and call.
 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
14. As one of the highest paid singers in the world
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 12:00 PM
Oct 2016

pulling in 96 million dollars last year he probably thinks its not worth his time or energy.

Princess Turandot

(4,787 posts)
15. He actually has accepted these kinds of honors in the past...
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 12:05 PM
Oct 2016

In 2012, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by PBO:



According to Wikipedia, he's also accepted the National Medal of Arts, the Kennedy Center Honors and a special Pulitzer, along with others. (And, of course, 12 Grammys, and several music halls of fame.)

So, who knows. Maybe he's not interested in participating in the formal proceedings that the Nobels have.

Zambero

(8,964 posts)
17. They've got a lot of nerve
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 12:26 PM
Oct 2016

To say they are Bob's friend.
When he was down they just stood there grinnin'!

So anyway, what took them so long??? 50+ years. Given those circumstances, at least they could give him a week or three to take notice!

Wibly

(613 posts)
19. What a load
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 12:46 PM
Oct 2016

Dylan is an artist. Many artist brain don't work in the same fashion other's do.
Chances are Dylan doesn't know what to say, or is still processing.
Leave him to it.
All this negative bs just speaks to those who are spouting it.
Dylan is being Dylan. Let him be Dylan.

DinahMoeHum

(21,783 posts)
20. Dear Swedish Academy - STFU, you simpering little twits. . .
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 12:47 PM
Oct 2016

. . .and have a little patience, for a change.

Dylan is not the kind of guy who jumps up and kisses on command.



BeyondGeography

(39,369 posts)
24. I agree
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 01:32 PM
Oct 2016
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/opinion/why-bob-dylan-shouldnt-have-gotten-a-nobel.html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share

Good argument for that in the link:

As reading declines around the world, literary prizes are more important than ever. A big prize means a jump in sales and readership even for a well-known writer. But more than that, awarding the Nobel to a novelist or a poet is a way of affirming that fiction and poetry still matter, that they are crucial human endeavors worthy of international recognition.

Popular music is such an endeavor too, but, for the most part, it already receives the recognition it deserves. And apart from a few spoken-word awards, no one would expect the highest honors in music to go to a writer — we won’t be seeing Zadie Smith or Mary Gaitskill in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame....
 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
66. Totally agree.
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 02:53 PM
Oct 2016

I never saw the appeal. I just think a lot of other much more talented literary artists were cheated this time around.

msongs

(67,394 posts)
22. a gift recipient is free to use the gift as he chooses. doh! nobel seems to want to have their butts
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 01:19 PM
Oct 2016

kissed and the recipients grovelling at their feet

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,338 posts)
25. I don't understand. Bob Dylan is well known for his manners and humility.
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 01:33 PM
Oct 2016

Maybe they should give a prize to Justin Bieber, see how that turns out.

madaboutharry

(40,207 posts)
26. It is rude and disappointing.
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 02:06 PM
Oct 2016

He has never been accused of being gracious.

On edit: There is an acknowledgment still up on his Facebook page. So who knows with him.

Nitram

(22,791 posts)
27. Maybe they should vet their awardees a bit before bestowing the prize upon them.
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 02:11 PM
Oct 2016

I've read a couple of biographies about Dylan, and this is not at all surprising. But he could still be contemplating a surprise. He's nothing if not predictable.

DeltaLitProf

(769 posts)
48. Excuse me but isn't the Nobel Prize funded by . . .
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 01:31 AM
Oct 2016

. . . money made from selling bombing technology!?!

Nitram

(22,791 posts)
54. No, the inventor of dynamite funded the prize.
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 10:17 AM
Oct 2016

Last edited Tue Oct 25, 2016, 08:53 AM - Edit history (1)

Dynamite can in no way be considered a "bombing technology."

ProfessorGAC

(64,995 posts)
69. Yep
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 03:20 PM
Oct 2016

It was invented to make mining safer as Nobel's brother got killed in a nitroglycerin accident.

They were using explosives in mining all over the world and he was looking for a way to make it safer to handle without people getting killed every day.

Nitram

(22,791 posts)
75. That's right. You can throw dynamite into a fire and it won't explode. Requires a spark.
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 06:52 PM
Oct 2016

Very safe and stable.

LakeArenal

(28,817 posts)
28. Everyone is talking about it so all get notoriety
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 02:20 PM
Oct 2016

He' s an artiste so he's temperamental. At least he didn't cut his ear off over it or anything. Still, a simple thank you, from the man with a million lyrics, might have been nice.

Oneironaut

(5,492 posts)
30. Maybe he's just an interesting guy who rejects accolades he feels are pointless.
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 02:24 PM
Oct 2016

Let's be honest - most highly creative people are also very quirky. It's not a bad thing. He was offered the award and doesn't want it. Leave the poor guy alone.

Response to Oneironaut (Reply #30)

Oneironaut

(5,492 posts)
44. Maybe, in his eyes, that would give legitimacy to the award that he doesn't feel is deserved.
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 10:48 PM
Oct 2016

I guess we'll never know. I think bugging someone to accept an award is equally rude. He probably should have said something, but maybe he doesn't feel like he should have to. Who knows?

Response to Oneironaut (Reply #44)

ghostsinthemachine

(3,569 posts)
31. I think he is embarrased
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 02:51 PM
Oct 2016

the Nobel prize is a yearly thing and he hasn't done anything in the past year, except release a cover album of Sinatra songs and an album too new to consider , to warrant the prize, and he knows it. An empty plaudit if there ever was one (Sort of like Obama winning the Peace prize, when he did nothing to warrant the award). A lifetime achievement award the Nobel is not.

This does shine a light on the sorry state of literature today however.

Response to ghostsinthemachine (Reply #31)

Response to athena (Reply #35)

nsd

(2,406 posts)
42. The Nobel prize in literature *is* a lifetime achievement award.
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 08:57 PM
Oct 2016

It is rarely given for a single book or other piece of work, and it almost never honors work done within the past year.

For example, when V.S. Naipaul won in 2001, the committee cited A House for Mr. Biswas (published 1961), The Loss of El Dorado (1969), The Enigma of Arrival (1987), and several other books. Usually, the prize is given for a whole body of work (a lifetime's worth of work).

In the sciences, the prize is typically given for a single achievement, but that achievement can be decades old. This years's physics prize went for work on phase transitions that dates to the early 1970s.

DeltaLitProf

(769 posts)
49. The Nobel in Literature . . .
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 01:33 AM
Oct 2016

. . . is more of a lifetime achievement. It's not like the Pulitzer or National Book Award in being for a specific work. Not anymore anyway.

tavernier

(12,377 posts)
40. My sweet Alan Rickman did not
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 06:30 PM
Oct 2016

believe in royalty titles and so was not offered, even though his fans often called him Sir Alan. I think it's a matter of choice. Perhaps he feels a Nobel prize puts him above other talented people who are equally deserving.

freebrew

(1,917 posts)
41. As a great fan of Dylan's...
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 06:50 PM
Oct 2016

after hearing of the award, said to myself: "What took so fucking long?".

Surprised that he doesn't acknowledge?

Not one bit. He's been the poet of generations worldwide.
Criticizing the very people that bemoaning him now.

75 years old, on tour with a number one hit, still writing.

Why do people still find it necessary to find fault with those more successful than themselves?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
45. I doubt he needs the money.
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 10:57 PM
Oct 2016

They can show up and present it to him, he is a public icon after all.

Response to Rex (Reply #45)

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
73. He is not unreachable, they just need to go to him if they really care.
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 05:17 PM
Oct 2016

Why not just move on? Plenty of other winners.

DeltaLitProf

(769 posts)
46. So they give the guy a Nobel Prize
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 11:50 PM
Oct 2016

. . . and forget to watch Don't Look Back?

He's trying to love his neighbor and do good to others.
But oh mother things ain't going so well.

electron_blue

(3,592 posts)
59. I think their lack of Nobel prize physicists to women in my lifetime is impolite and arrogant
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 09:17 AM
Oct 2016

the committee loses credibility

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
63. After some reflection, I think if I were him, I'd continue ignoring them.
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 12:40 PM
Oct 2016

They are full of themselves if they are going to condescend to award-winners.

Honestly, with this public excoriation, they've now turned their prize into a booby - at least for him, because he's filthy rich and doesn't need the $1M prize, and yet if he responded after this insult, he's validating it.

Another thing, you know what? Plenty of people have worked with him, know him, or know members of his entourage, and yet, they generally keep their mouths shut even though he's well-known to have his eccentricities.

What kind of a professional in charge of administering a trust talks like this about trust beneficiaries? I think, in fact, that this Per Wastberg should be replaced, if he did call Dylan arrogant. No call for that kind of talk at all.

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
64. It is a weird spot for Dylan, or anybody to be in.
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 01:32 PM
Oct 2016

If he accepts, he is their puppet. If he just blows it off and they get mad, it says a lot more about them than about him.

Response to cbdo2007 (Reply #64)

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
78. You are missing the point by requiring his response.
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 07:38 PM
Oct 2016

He doesn't owe you or them anything. They gave him the award and he's choosing to be exactly who we all expect him to be, which is why they gave it to him to begin with.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
74. I love how Bob Dylan travels around in small company
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 05:42 PM
Oct 2016

Check out this:

Jean-Paul Sartre | French philosopher and author | Britannica.com
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jean-Paul-Sartre
Encyclopædia Britannica
Jean-Paul Sartre. Jean-Paul Sartre, (born June 21, 1905, Paris, France—died April 15, 1980, Paris) French novelist, playwright, and exponent of Existentialism—a philosophy acclaiming the freedom of the individual human being. He was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1964, but he declined i

LisaM

(27,801 posts)
77. He's always acted this way - ever seen that documentary made about him in the 1960s?
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 07:08 PM
Oct 2016

It's been a while since I saw it, but I remember things like someone asking him something about a song lyric and he answered, "uh, what do you mean by love?" (I can't quite get the sneering sound here). It was just an absolutely silly response, and he obviously hasn't changed, but you'd think the Nobel committee would know this about him and not expect anything more.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bob Dylan's Nobel silence...