Bernie Sanders Says WikiLeaks Would Find ‘Less Than Flattering’ Things About Clinton In His Emails
Source: Mediaite
by Justin Baragona | 12:59 pm, October 24th, 2016
In an interview with the Washington Post, former Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders came to the Clinton campaigns defense over some of the revelations in recent WikiLeaks email dumps from Hillary ally John Podesta.
Explaining that this is what you see in rival campaigns, the Vermont Senator noted that if WikiLeaks went rooting through his campaigns emails, theyd see some potentially rough stuff about Hillary Clinton.
Trust me, if they went into our emails I suppose which may happen, who knows Im sure there would be statements that would be less than flattering about, you know, the Clinton staff, Sanders said. Thats what happens in campaigns.
-snip-
Read more: http://www.mediaite.com/print/bernie-sanders-says-wikileaks-would-find-less-than-flattering-things-about-clinton-in-his-emails/
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)by pretending that political campaigns acting like political campaigns and publishing private e-mails out of context is a "great scandal"....
In three more weeks, we'll hear no more of him or his useful idiot defenders on the alt left...
cstanleytech
(26,286 posts)he could be doing it with the hopes of securing himself a new safe haven since he really doesnt have many other choices at his disposal.
riversedge
(70,200 posts)TonyPDX
(962 posts)shrike
(3,817 posts)And why I appreciate his support of Hillary now.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Oh yeah, and because you don't drop the rope during a tug of war if you want your team to win.
shrike
(3,817 posts)stonecutter357
(12,695 posts)there would be statements from Bernie are his bro's that would be less than flattering about, you know, the Clinton staff,
Democat
(11,617 posts)What if they dumped a bunch of emails between Trump and his lawyers?
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)He may have several accounts with made-up names for 'personal stuff'. The man seems to enjoy his playboy0troll- sock-puppet twitter "games".
Paladin
(28,254 posts)MANative
(4,112 posts)Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)The media keeps trying to drive a wedge between Sanders and Clinton but he is flat out refusing to take the bait. Even when it would seem to be real tempting.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)FigTree
(347 posts)Assange is now doing whatever he is doing in an effort to stay relevant. Such relevance is pretty much the only thing that stands between the embassy he lives in and a jail cell somewhere. What he does has therefore become extremely personal to him and he has thus lost any credibility.
Sanders is pretty much the most honest politician one can hope for in an average democratic political system. And I'm sure he's not 100% honest either.
Watching the aftermath of the Al Smith dinner, there was a feed of HC talking with, I think, Kissinger. Her facial expressions clearly reflected a very different, more genuine, animated, individual than what one sees when she is facing a camera, playing the political game. She was talking to a peer. If decrepit and barely relevant himself, but a peer still. In a somewhat sad way, I was relieved to see this.
Politicians, and she's certainly not the worst of them, have to align themselves along a marketed, consumable persona. Or lose. This is a fundamental problem of modern democracy.