Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio officially charged with criminal contempt
Source: AzCentral
With a federal judge's signature on a proposed order initially submitted by prosecutors Oct. 17, the deal is sealed: Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is criminally charged with federal contempt of court.
A trial is set for Dec. 6 in U.S. District Court in Phoenix.
Since early 2015, criminal-contempt charges have loomed over Arpaio, the potential consequence for violating a federal judges order to stop enforcing civil immigration laws.
SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO LEGAL TROUBLES
Judge rules Arpaio in contempt of court
Profiling case costs taxpayers $13M on top of $41M
Profile: Arpaio has always done it his way
Key moments in contempt case
Arpaio through the years
Arpaio: PI investigated judge's wife
Arpaio's legal fate hinges on intent
The man judging Sheriff Joe
Marshals sent to seize Arpaio evidence
The threat of criminal prosecution became increasingly likely after a prolonged series of hearings last year. A federal judges finding of civil contempt came in May 2016, followed by his referral for criminal prosecution in August, followed by the Department of Justices announcement on Oct. 11 that its attorneys would, in fact, prosecute the six-term lawman.
Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2016/10/25/maricopa-county-sheriff-joe-arpaio-officially-charged-criminal-contempt/92472998/
Bout time!
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Hope he's wearing tighty-pinkies during it!
...or, maybe not (mental image overload )
GWC58
(2,678 posts)pink panties!😬😬
TonyPDX
(962 posts)Jopin Klobe
(779 posts)... squirt it with "Roundup"? ...
jmowreader
(50,555 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)Growing up this is what we put into those pump sprayers for the backyard - My job to go out and spray the veggies . Still remember that kerosene/oil smell.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)calimary
(81,220 posts)MyOwnPeace
(16,925 posts)what would happen should he actually be sent to one of his own "tent cities?"
Judi Lynn
(160,524 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,445 posts)ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)Please let the fat lady have song for this guy.
pennylane100
(3,425 posts)Especially when the term seems to be used exclusively to describe female singers.
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)and there's nothing wrong with being fat... unless you are Donald Drumpf, who loathes such women.
muntrv
(14,505 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/arizona/investigations/2015/09/11/sheriff-joe-arpaio-legacy/71888720/
Time for this racist scumbag to put on the pink underwear and spend some time in one of his tent city jails, preferably in the Arizona Summer heat.
Arpaio is a disgrace to the badge and a blight upon the citizens of Maricopa County.
geomon666
(7,512 posts)nikto
(3,284 posts)Then ...
Throw key into Marianas Trench.
40RatRod
(532 posts)Then invite those he who locked up to watch him being marched in. Feed him baloney sandwiches and no AC. What goes around sometimes comes around for the most deserving. Sometimes the fickle finger of fate just knows exactly where to stick it's finger.
nikto
(3,284 posts)Charge JOE for the panties.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)I refuse to feel sorry for him.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)And, weirdly enough, he and Trump have the same birthday. June 14 was a sad day in world history.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)nikto
(3,284 posts)Kennah
(14,256 posts)BadGimp
(4,015 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)Attorney General.
former9thward
(31,984 posts)No one goes to jail under federal guidelines. It is a fine if convicted.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)former9thward
(31,984 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 26, 2016, 02:47 PM - Edit history (1)
She was charged with a completely different crime. Apples and oranges.
Massacure
(7,520 posts)Susan McDugal was asked to answer several questions before a grand jury and refused. After she served the maximum 18 months the judge had no choice but to release her, though Susan could have gotten out of jail anytime during her stay by appearing before the grand jury and answering their questions. The federal government then tried to charge her for criminal contempt and obstruction of justice, but the jury hung on contempt and acquitted her on obstruction. She did spend some time imprisoned on charges for fraud and conspiracy as another Former9thWard mentioned.
Joe Arpaio is being charged for criminal contempt. There is no get out of jail free card with criminal contempt. If he is convicted, he will have to serve whatever sentence is imposed (up to six months imprisonment and a $1000 fine).
Massacure
(7,520 posts)I wasn't able to find much with Google, only that the maximum penalty is 6 months imprisonment and a $1000 fine. If the judge feels that Arpaio is thumbing his nose at the court system, is there anything that would prevent him or her from throwing the book at Arpaio and imposing that maximum penalty?
former9thward
(31,984 posts)But judges are required to look at a defendant's past criminal conduct and Arpaio has none. Also federal judges, although appointed for life, look at the morning headlines whether we like it or not. A judge is not going to sentence a 84 year old, who has a great deal of popularity in Arizona and elsewhere, to prison. That just is not the real world.
malthaussen
(17,187 posts)I had always thought that contempt was something wholly in control of the judge, that one is "held in contempt" or "found in contempt." Yet this appears to be a criminal charge with a trial and the whole ball of wax. What is the difference?
-- Mal
former9thward
(31,984 posts)Civil contempt is meant to try and force the defendant into doing something the court wants -- like testifying before a grand jury or pay child support. Civil contempt sanctions typically end when the party in contempt complies with the court order, or when the underlying case is resolved. Criminal contempt is meant to punish the defendant for past deeds.
Those held in civil contempt must be given notice of the contempt sanctions and an opportunity to be heard, but usually are not guaranteed a jury trial. Also, their contempt does not need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, while criminal contempt charges must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Finally, criminal contempt involves a specified sentence (jail and/or fine), while civil contempt sanctions can be more indefinite, lasting until either the underlying case is resolved or the party in contempt complies with the court order.
One charged with criminal contempt generally gets the constitutional rights guaranteed to criminal defendants, including the right to counsel, right to put on a defense, and the right to a jury trial in certain cases. Charges of criminal contempt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Joe Arpaio was charged with criminal contempt because the judge thought his actions over the years were a deliberate defiance of the court's orders. His contention is that it was not intentional. The judge has said the maximum sentence should be 6 months in jail which means its a misdemeanor.
malthaussen
(17,187 posts)I was unaware of the fact that there were two kinds of contempt. Makes sense, since there are civil suits for all sorts of criminal activity.
-- Mal
packman
(16,296 posts)Miserable, arrogant bastard. Stereotype Big Hoss Southern bullneck sherrif - let him rot.
True_Blue
(3,063 posts)larryo
(15 posts)far and away the best part will be when he is put in general population, wherever he goes, and tries to walk the yard unmolested.