Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:20 PM Oct 2016

#BREAKING: Jury finds 7 Malheur occupiers not guilty

Last edited Thu Oct 27, 2016, 08:00 PM - Edit history (2)

Source: Twitter

KOIN News Verified account ‏@KOINNews 6m6 minutes ago

#BREAKING: Jury finds 7 Malheur occupiers not guilty of conspiring to impede federal workers from doing jobs at refuge. #OregonStandoff


Read more: https://twitter.com/KOINNews/status/791778918155952128



#BundyTeaParty can now move to the new trial in Nevada for #BundyRanchStandoff. Good luck with that!




On edit as news stories posted:

Maxine Bernstein @maxoregonian 4:40 PM - 27 Oct 2016
Jury finds all Oregon standoff defendants not guilty of federal conspiracy, gun charges #oregonstandoff
http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/10/oregon_standoff_verdicts_annou.html

.... Ammon Bundy's lawyer Marcus Mumford argued that his client, dressed in a gray suit and white dress shirt, should be allowed to walk out of the court, a free man.

U.S. District Judge Anna J. Brown told him that there was a U.S. Marshal's hold on him from a pending federal indictment in Nevada.

"If there's a detainer, show me,'' Mumford stood, arguing before U.S. District Judge Anna J. Brown.

Suddenly, a group of about six U.S. Marshals surrounded Mumford at his defense table and grabbed on to him.

"What are you doing?'' Mumford yelled, as he struggled and was taken down to the floor.

As deputy marshals yelled, "Stop resisting,'' the judge demanded, "Everybody out of the courtroom now!''

Mumford was taken into custody, a member of his legal team confirmed. .....




The New York Times @nytimes 4:37 PM - 27 Oct 2016
Breaking News: Ammon Bundy and 6 followers acquitted in takeover of Oregon wildlife refuge
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/28/us/bundy-brothers-acquitted-in-takeover-of-oregon-wildlife-refuge.html

"In a monthlong trial here, the defendants never denied that they had occupied and held the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters for nearly six weeks, demanding that the federal government surrender the 188,000-acre property to local control. But their lawyers argued that prosecutors did not prove that the group had engaged in an illegal conspiracy that kept federal workers — employees of the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Land Management — from doing their jobs."
116 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
#BREAKING: Jury finds 7 Malheur occupiers not guilty (Original Post) Coyotl Oct 2016 OP
So free to fuck us all up at will... Foggyhill Oct 2016 #1
ffs joeybee12 Oct 2016 #2
Let me guess…there wasn't enough fucking EVIDENCE for the jury? blm Oct 2016 #3
Facts? We don't care about facts! elias7 Oct 2016 #61
no - video feeds, FB posts, tweets and being there don't count wordpix Oct 2016 #99
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2016 #116
What the fuck? dbackjon Oct 2016 #4
Meanwhile, Native American Protectors are being maced & rounded up Achilleaze Oct 2016 #5
^^This^^!!! Wuddles440 Oct 2016 #41
They let the right wing pos criminals go free rockfordfile Oct 2016 #6
So you can do that and it's OK? Red Mountain Oct 2016 #7
Hey, Red......... MyOwnPeace Oct 2016 #36
What other evidence did they need? dbackjon Oct 2016 #8
Next time the feds just need to use armed force geek tragedy Oct 2016 #9
Juries just can't seem to understand the laws anymore. Look sinkingfeeling Oct 2016 #10
The Casey Anthony jury found 100% the right verdict obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #26
Really, you think she had nothing to do with the murder of a sweet sinkingfeeling Oct 2016 #28
I personally don't think Kaylee was murdered obamanut2012 Oct 2016 #35
read the statute and review the evidence Amishman Oct 2016 #83
That wasn't the question before that jury jberryhill Oct 2016 #90
Here's an actual news story about this. Twitter is not a news source, by the way. pnwmom Oct 2016 #11
+1 harun Oct 2016 #105
Prosecutors overcharged, as usual. former9thward Oct 2016 #12
My first thought as well pediatricmedic Oct 2016 #21
Possession of firearms at a federal facility is "overcharged" ? Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2016 #42
Yes. former9thward Oct 2016 #49
I don't remember that particular charge in the charging documents. PSPS Oct 2016 #53
A link former9thward Oct 2016 #59
Thanks. PSPS Oct 2016 #77
I see. Thanks for the background and the analysis. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2016 #67
not guilty? lemme guess the skin color. unblock Oct 2016 #14
I don't think race matters metroins Oct 2016 #55
lol! yeah, mind-boggling, the idea that justice might be slightly different for black people. unblock Oct 2016 #56
Not uncomfortable metroins Oct 2016 #58
See: North Dakota ... Date: TODAY ... brett_jv Oct 2016 #66
Whatever floats your boat metroins Oct 2016 #69
really? barbtries Oct 2016 #80
So they must have been just visiting? Having a picnic with snacks? IronLionZion Oct 2016 #15
You'd have to convict them of a crime before you can christx30 Oct 2016 #44
Guilty Verdicts had to be unanimous so one juror could have done this underpants Oct 2016 #16
One juror dissenting is called a "hung" jury, not a verdict. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2016 #43
D'oh! underpants Oct 2016 #45
I bet there were anti-government fuckers on the jury alarimer Oct 2016 #17
Amen 47of74 Oct 2016 #37
AMEN!!! philosslayer Oct 2016 #65
A jury is allowed to vote no for any reason at all Travis_0004 Oct 2016 #86
What evidence leads you to allege that? LanternWaste Oct 2016 #89
investigate them for what? having ideas you don't like? Amishman Oct 2016 #84
Wait... NOT the Onion? Adrahil Oct 2016 #18
Yeah, MyOwnPeace Oct 2016 #38
My guess is the case was contaminated by the use of FBI infiltrators actively encouraging Monk06 Oct 2016 #19
Groovy, I am going to go colonize Santa Barbara Island Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2016 #20
hmmmmm, that reminds me trc Oct 2016 #50
For the purposes of being called upon to "check one's privilege" I suppose I am white Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2016 #62
yes, the point of my apparently not humorous comment on white privelige trc Oct 2016 #68
Oh no, it was humorous. I seem to be the one who failed at that. Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2016 #71
BREAKING: U.S. Marshals Service: Ammon Bundy's attorney Marcus Mumford in federal custody Coyotl Oct 2016 #22
Hmm... Possibly, jury tampering? Hugin Oct 2016 #94
Screaming at the judge telling her she must release the Bundy brothers, wouldn't shut up. Coyotl Oct 2016 #96
oh...article didn't say so that explains it: "We own the courts!!! Donald says so!" wordpix Oct 2016 #109
article says it's b/c Mumford asked for papers to show Bundy shold be held wordpix Oct 2016 #108
White Privilege Much?? malchickiwick Oct 2016 #24
Trump will love this left-of-center2012 Oct 2016 #27
Yet... Else You Are Mad Oct 2016 #30
Meanwhile in North Dakota... nt Earth_First Oct 2016 #32
Jury nullifucation? Agnosticsherbet Oct 2016 #33
So, MyOwnPeace Oct 2016 #39
Governor Kate Brown Statement Coyotl Oct 2016 #40
Yeah but Danascot Oct 2016 #46
This a a greenlight for more of this crap Va Lefty Oct 2016 #47
I can't help but think the Nevada case will be difft. hollowdweller Oct 2016 #48
I want the protesters at the Dakota Pipeline released immediately, and these protesters didn't have still_one Oct 2016 #52
Were they even charged with vandalism, destroying property, and whatever law cover the artifacts? Crash2Parties Oct 2016 #54
Jury knew more than us metroins Oct 2016 #57
Well, I know what I saw just on TEEVEE mdbl Oct 2016 #82
WRONG. Jurors are only allowed to see SOME evidence. Bohunk68 Oct 2016 #87
So disgusted. They can raid and occupy at will. Literally S##t all over ALBliberal Oct 2016 #60
That's pathatic. paleotn Oct 2016 #63
i guess taking over federal land is no okw rdking647 Oct 2016 #64
Conservative militia requests/encourages killing of police. keithbvadu2 Oct 2016 #70
I can't even read it. This is so wrong! Equinox Moon Oct 2016 #72
Wow. jeffreyi Oct 2016 #73
Next up: Courthouses and post offices!!! moondust Oct 2016 #74
Yep... If you thought the Nevada standoff was emboldening, you haven't seen anything, yet! Hugin Oct 2016 #92
Are? You? Fucking? Kidding? Kennah Oct 2016 #75
I'm guessing it was an all-white jury. nt SunSeeker Oct 2016 #76
Same reason Zimmerman got off DonCoquixote Oct 2016 #78
I think your first paragraph is absolutely right. nt raccoon Oct 2016 #97
i don't believe it. barbtries Oct 2016 #79
Immediate reaction is sickening disbelief HAB911 Oct 2016 #81
It's difficult to not be discouraged by this but don't be. randome Oct 2016 #85
they will still control the House, and governors mansions and legislatures geek tragedy Oct 2016 #98
You can't live w them, you can't shame them, you can't put 'em in a box & mail 'em to the Marianas. randome Oct 2016 #101
they sure as hell continue to stop gay rights. geek tragedy Oct 2016 #102
White people get off scott-free, Native-Americans get tear-gassed and beaten. Odin2005 Oct 2016 #88
Blacks would have been shot on sight dalton99 Oct 2016 #93
Crap! Hugin Oct 2016 #91
Disgusting Owl Oct 2016 #95
My question to this Separation Oct 2016 #112
White Terrorist Bundy Group Goes Free Judi Lynn Oct 2016 #115
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #

blm

(113,044 posts)
3. Let me guess…there wasn't enough fucking EVIDENCE for the jury?
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:25 PM
Oct 2016

Did they need just one more thin mint?

elias7

(3,997 posts)
61. Facts? We don't care about facts!
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 09:16 PM
Oct 2016

The dumbing down down of America. The legacy of the vast Rightwing conspiracy.

Response to blm (Reply #3)

Red Mountain

(1,731 posts)
7. So you can do that and it's OK?
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:32 PM
Oct 2016

Holy shit I never thought this country was that far gone........that the rule of law is meaningless.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
9. Next time the feds just need to use armed force
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:35 PM
Oct 2016

very clear that unless they fear death they have zero reason to worry about the idiot jurors in that part of the country actually applying the law

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
26. The Casey Anthony jury found 100% the right verdict
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 08:03 PM
Oct 2016

I give them major props for doing the right thing legally.

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
35. I personally don't think Kaylee was murdered
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 08:10 PM
Oct 2016

I think she was killed accidentally, and helped covered up by Casey's dad.

But, it doesn't make a difference what either of us feels or thinks -- there is zero evidence she murdered her daughter. ero. It is impossible to prove that. It is impossible to prove that Kaylee was even murdered.

They made it capital crime -- ridiculous overcharging.

MAYBE manslaughter may have stuck, maybe. Child endangerment and neglect only would have gotten her 10-20. The DA was an egomaniac.

Amishman

(5,555 posts)
83. read the statute and review the evidence
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 06:36 AM
Oct 2016

the Anthony verdict is a textbook example of what happens when a prosecutor over charges

we are a nation of laws, and the outcome in the Anthony case was appropriate given the letter of the law and the charges brought.

if you want to be pissed, be angry with the prosecutor.

Getting back to the subject at hand, I would be really curious to know the exact reasoning behind the jury decision

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
90. That wasn't the question before that jury
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 08:49 AM
Oct 2016

The jury wasn't asked whether she "had anything to do" with the death of that child.

The jury was asked whether the state proved that she killed that child.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
11. Here's an actual news story about this. Twitter is not a news source, by the way.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:37 PM
Oct 2016

The station that sent the tweet should be listed as your source.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/latest-oregon-standoff-jury-agree-charge-43118933

The leaders of an armed group that took over a national wildlife refuge in rural Oregon have been found not guilty of conspiracy and possession of firearms at a federal facility.

A jury on Thursday exonerated brothers Ammon and Ryan Bundy and five others of conspiring to impede federal workers from their jobs at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.

Some of the defendants also were charged with possession of firearms at a federal facility and were acquitted on that count as well.

The standoff began Jan. 2 and lasted nearly six weeks, bringing new attention to a long-running dispute over control of federal lands in the U.S. West.

SNIP

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
49. Yes.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 08:46 PM
Oct 2016

They were charged with carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, which has a maximum penalty of life in prison. Prosecutors were trying to 'send a message'. Juries are not going to convict with a life in prison charge when no one was harmed. Juries do not like to be used as tools (or fools) by either side. So they voted not guilty on all the charges in order to send their own message.

PSPS

(13,591 posts)
53. I don't remember that particular charge in the charging documents.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 08:56 PM
Oct 2016

My understanding is that they faced a maximum of ten years, certainly not life.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
59. A link
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 09:11 PM
Oct 2016
The federal government on Wednesday leveled additional charges against Ammon Bundy and dozens of others who staged an armed takeover of a national wildlife refuge in Oregon

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — The federal government on Wednesday leveled additional charges against Ammon Bundy and dozens of others who staged an armed takeover of a national wildlife refuge in Oregon. One weapons allegation carries the possibility of life in prison.

He and eight others, including his brother Ryan, were charged with carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, which has a maximum penalty of life in prison.

http://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2016-03-09/fbi-agents-investigated-over-shots-fired-during-standoff

unblock

(52,199 posts)
14. not guilty? lemme guess the skin color.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:43 PM
Oct 2016

seriously, can you imagine the same outcome if they were all black?

unblock

(52,199 posts)
56. lol! yeah, mind-boggling, the idea that justice might be slightly different for black people.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 09:09 PM
Oct 2016

but let's not talk about that, wouldn't want to "inject" any uncomfortable truths....

brett_jv

(1,245 posts)
66. See: North Dakota ... Date: TODAY ...
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 10:07 PM
Oct 2016

... to see an illustration of how the authorities 'react' to 'protests' by non-whites.

If these guys were all black, asking for redress of black grievances ... they'd almost certainly have been tear-gassed and/or forcibly removed at gunpoint (at BEST) within the first few days, and then they'd have ended up convicted and locked up for years.

If you have any serious question about this not being how things would've gone down in that case, you must be living in a cave, or cave-equivalent.

Goings on in N. Dakota today shows exactly what happens when you 'occupy' places the government doesn't want you to ... when you're non-white.

metroins

(2,550 posts)
69. Whatever floats your boat
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 10:21 PM
Oct 2016

You see it your way.

I see it as poor prosecutorial procedure and rich defendants with backing from their community.

IronLionZion

(45,430 posts)
15. So they must have been just visiting? Having a picnic with snacks?
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:44 PM
Oct 2016


These assholes should at least pay for the damage they caused to the site. They should clean it up for community service.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
44. You'd have to convict them of a crime before you can
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 08:34 PM
Oct 2016

impose any kind of penalty like community service or force them to pay for damages.
Sounds like the prosecutor didn't do a good enough job. So they are going to get off scott free. Except for Lavoy Finicum.

underpants

(182,773 posts)
16. Guilty Verdicts had to be unanimous so one juror could have done this
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:50 PM
Oct 2016

Still I can't imagine them getting off scot free. Amazing.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
17. I bet there were anti-government fuckers on the jury
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:51 PM
Oct 2016

They need to investigate them all. This is a fucking travesty. Maybe get rid of the jury system, since Americans are too ducking stupid to understand anything anymore. The government should have gone in, guns blazing, and killed every last one of those assholes. They do not get to own this country !!!!!!!!!

 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
37. Amen
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 08:13 PM
Oct 2016

our government has got to stop treating these fuck sticks with kid gloves and get out the goddamn pliers and blowtorches.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
86. A jury is allowed to vote no for any reason at all
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 07:08 AM
Oct 2016

Jury nullification is completely legal, so Im not sure what you would investigate then for

Also it sets a horrible precident to go after a jury because you dont like how they voted.

Amishman

(5,555 posts)
84. investigate them for what? having ideas you don't like?
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 06:46 AM
Oct 2016

Jury nullification is legal. Having unpopular ideas is legal. So unless you have specific evidence that these anonymous jurors committed crimes, I suggest taking a step back and thinking about it. As I said already in this thread, we are a nation of laws.

There is a significant slice of this country with very different ideals than what we are used to. It showed up with the actions of these idiots invading the refuge, it showed up again with the verdict, and we are seeing it with Trump. Thankfully they are far from a majority, but sharing a country with these people is going to be a big ongoing challenge. I do not envy President Clinton in her task, as the only practical solution given their numbers is to try to reach out a hand and calm them somehow.

This fucking sucks, but it is the world we live in.

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
19. My guess is the case was contaminated by the use of FBI infiltrators actively encouraging
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:52 PM
Oct 2016

less than peaceful actions by the defendents

Also jury nullification could be a factor

The next time the FBI won't be playing nicey nice though So that is a bad result

Meanwhile these couch potato revolutionaries will quickly try to do this again

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
20. Groovy, I am going to go colonize Santa Barbara Island
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:53 PM
Oct 2016

Where does one obtain a Gadsden flag in Orange County?

I promise not to shit everywhere.

trc

(823 posts)
50. hmmmmm, that reminds me
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 08:47 PM
Oct 2016

I visited Angel Island in the San Franciso Bay when I was a kid. I remember there being an abandoned military site there...You take Santa Barbara Island, I will take Angel Island State Park and we will start our own navy and claim all the oil on or around our land (I will claim all the refining in Richmond as our birthright as white oppressed Americans....btw, if you are not white, this plan will not work). Glory will be ours, but I make no promises about where I shit.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
62. For the purposes of being called upon to "check one's privilege" I suppose I am white
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 09:19 PM
Oct 2016

But if you're a white supremacist with a sniper rifle I am probably not white.

trc

(823 posts)
68. yes, the point of my apparently not humorous comment on white privelige
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 10:14 PM
Oct 2016

seems to have gone awry. Not sure where the "white supremacist with a sniper rifle" comes from but I will assume it is my lack of clarity or maybe my avatar, either way, my bad.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
71. Oh no, it was humorous. I seem to be the one who failed at that.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 10:41 PM
Oct 2016

I basically look like Borat, whether or not that qualifies as "white" is a matter of perspective.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
22. BREAKING: U.S. Marshals Service: Ammon Bundy's attorney Marcus Mumford in federal custody
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 07:56 PM
Oct 2016
Brent Weisberg ‏@BrentKOIN 1 minute ago
BREAKING: U.S. Marshals Service: Ammon Bundy's attorney Marcus Mumford in federal custody
http://koin.com/2016/10/27/jury-reaches-verdict-in-malheur-case/ … #KOIN6News #oregonstandoff

Hugin

(33,131 posts)
94. Hmm... Possibly, jury tampering?
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 09:29 AM
Oct 2016

Not that "how" this clinker occurred will matter to these guys.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
96. Screaming at the judge telling her she must release the Bundy brothers, wouldn't shut up.
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 09:35 AM
Oct 2016

He lost it in the courtroom, acted like a 4-year-old having a tantrum. Contempt of court is the likely charge.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
109. oh...article didn't say so that explains it: "We own the courts!!! Donald says so!"
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 12:47 PM
Oct 2016

fricking idiots

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
108. article says it's b/c Mumford asked for papers to show Bundy shold be held
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 12:44 PM
Oct 2016

on another charge in NV. Doesn't make sense that should cause several marshals to pile onto an att'y.

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
30. Yet...
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 08:06 PM
Oct 2016

People that are peacefully protesting on public land are getting arrested and face 45 years in jail....

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
40. Governor Kate Brown Statement
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 08:17 PM
Oct 2016

Governor Kate Brown @OregonGovBrown
Statement regarding the Malheur Refuge Occupation trial:

 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
48. I can't help but think the Nevada case will be difft.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 08:41 PM
Oct 2016

They physically did prevent federal employees from doing their job and pointed guns at them.

However the fact that they were found not guilty of weapons charges is confusing.

metroins

(2,550 posts)
57. Jury knew more than us
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 09:09 PM
Oct 2016

I'm not sure how they got off, I mean it seems pretty clear something illegal happened and somebody died during the ordeal.

I'm guessing wrong charges and a bad prosecutor? At least trespassing?

I have to trust the jurors know more than me.

mdbl

(4,973 posts)
82. Well, I know what I saw just on TEEVEE
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 06:28 AM
Oct 2016

and dem boys was brakin da law. Any dumb juror would know that.

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
87. WRONG. Jurors are only allowed to see SOME evidence.
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 07:16 AM
Oct 2016

A lot of evidence is not presented in trial after trial. That is pretty much common knowledge if you grew up watching anything on the boob tube. We, the public, see and consider far more evidence. Where did you grow up that you would not know this?

ALBliberal

(2,339 posts)
60. So disgusted. They can raid and occupy at will. Literally S##t all over
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 09:11 PM
Oct 2016

Our national parks. Cause millions of dollars of damage. And now what? They will feel empowered right before the election. Only consolation is that they were in jail for many months. As a taxpaying citizen...this really pisses me off. Oh yeah...those Native American antiquities... apparently meaningless... so frustrated.

paleotn

(17,911 posts)
63. That's pathatic.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 09:37 PM
Oct 2016

...but given the quality juries today, I'm not all that surprised. Few even want to serve on juries anymore. When you get the call, serve if at all possible. It does make a difference.

keithbvadu2

(36,775 posts)
70. Conservative militia requests/encourages killing of police.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 10:28 PM
Oct 2016

Conservative militia requests/encourages killing of police.

Starts about 10:40 on the timeline

One of our Christian, patriot, conservative militia heroes encouraging supporters to come shoot the police when they conquered and captured an unmanned Federal nature preserve in Oregon.

Where were our conservatives to call this out as wrong?



Our conservatives have many more guns than black folks do.

---------------------------

Then we have republican Michelle Fiore.

Lawmaker: It’s Okay To Aim Guns At Cops If They Aim At You First

http://lawofficer.com/2016/05/lawmaker-its-okay-to-aim-guns-at-cops-if-they-aim-at-you-first/

jeffreyi

(1,939 posts)
73. Wow.
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 12:06 AM
Oct 2016

So much for justice. This makes no sense. I fear for our country. Rule of law, who needs it. Vandalise at will, no consequences. Destroy public property, no big deal. Sickened and disgusted.

Hugin

(33,131 posts)
92. Yep... If you thought the Nevada standoff was emboldening, you haven't seen anything, yet!
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 09:27 AM
Oct 2016

This is the green light the Sovereign Citizens have been waiting for... They will read this as a confirmation of their fevered rantings about secret code filings and vigilantism.

I see a storm on the horizon.

I suspect jury tampering as the real reason the not guilty verdict was found.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
78. Same reason Zimmerman got off
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 03:38 AM
Oct 2016

The purpose of the NRA is to protect the right of White Males to shoot minorities and Federal officers. If Trump wins, these batards will get medals. Yet, if 1,only one protector in the Dakotas has a sign, they will shoot. I fully expect some pipeline protest member to get shot , followed byTrump to promise a pardon if he wins.

You good old boys that love your property are going to make a fine sight when the same billionaires use their muscle to slide you out do they can turn your ranches and small towns into suburbs and Wal Mart, to be followed by Beijing buying them out.

barbtries

(28,787 posts)
79. i don't believe it.
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 04:15 AM
Oct 2016

actually found out from an Idaho fb friend's happy post. one of her friends then commented when will the FBI be charged with killing LaVoy or whatever the fuck his name is.
so much for being a nation of laws, not men.
i think i'm in shock. i actually kind of want to cry.

HAB911

(8,888 posts)
81. Immediate reaction is sickening disbelief
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 06:10 AM
Oct 2016

turning to:

A jury of their peers.........WTF could we have expected?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
85. It's difficult to not be discouraged by this but don't be.
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 06:47 AM
Oct 2016

Despite this one setback for the rule of law and common decency, the Bundy Clan is still a dying breed, as are the Gingriches, Scarboroughs, Coulters and Hannitys we see. They have already lost this election and they will continue behaving like drunk frat boys until the tidal wave of change sweeps them all out to sea.

They will still be angry and without class. We just have to put up with them a little longer.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
98. they will still control the House, and governors mansions and legislatures
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 11:11 AM
Oct 2016

they're dying, but they retain the ability to do a massive amount of harm, and there's no guarantee they won't burn the house down

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
101. You can't live w them, you can't shame them, you can't put 'em in a box & mail 'em to the Marianas.
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 11:28 AM
Oct 2016

So the battle continues but their 'war' is already lost. They can't stop gay rights, they can't stop women and minorities from becoming fully integrated in society. They've lost. All that's left is how much whining we have to listen to.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
102. they sure as hell continue to stop gay rights.
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 11:30 AM
Oct 2016

most states have zero protections for LGBT Americans. Not in housing, not in employment, etc etc.

And they continue to prevent woman and minorities from becoming fully integrated--heck they're still disenfranchising minorities.

the deep fascistic, ethno-nationalistic pathologies that afflict most uneducated white people in the US will haunt us for decades to come

Separation

(1,975 posts)
112. My question to this
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 02:08 PM
Oct 2016

Are any of them being tried for the death that occurred during the FBI pullover? I know that if two guys rob a store and the cashier shoots and kills one of the robbers, the other robber will be tried for that murder. So did this trial, or the next one coming up, have the defendants on trial for murder?

Judi Lynn

(160,523 posts)
115. White Terrorist Bundy Group Goes Free
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 06:14 PM
Oct 2016

White Terrorist Bundy Group Goes Free

October 28, 2016


The Bundy family can do no wrong in the eyes of the law, even when they are pointing loaded assault weapons at law enforcement officials and causing millions in damages to federal property. It pays to white in America today, and that’s sickening. The Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this.

- video at link -


https://trofire.com/2016/10/28/white-terrorist-bundy-group-goes-free/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»#BREAKING: Jury finds 7 M...