Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SoCalNative

(4,613 posts)
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 04:23 PM Nov 2016

Judge Issues Restraining Order Against Trump Campaign to Prevent Voter Intimidation

Source: Mother Jones

In a surprise ruling, a US district judge in Ohio issued a restraining order against Donald Trump's campaign to prevent anyone working on the campaign from harassing and intimidating voters at the polls on Tuesday.

The order came after a two-hour hearing in which the judge pressed Trump's lawyer to justify the candidate's inflammatory rhetoric about voter fraud. It also applies to close Trump adviser Roger Stone, who has organized poll-watching activities, and the "officers, agents, servants, and employees" of Trump and Stone.

Read more: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/11/civil-rights-lawyer-tweets-voter-suppression-hearing-donald-trump

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Issues Restraining Order Against Trump Campaign to Prevent Voter Intimidation (Original Post) SoCalNative Nov 2016 OP
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS! 50 Shades Of Blue Nov 2016 #1
Damn! Botany Nov 2016 #2
Should be BREAKING NEWS banners Amonester Nov 2016 #3
They will do it anyways. padfun Nov 2016 #4
Not if I have anything to say about it... brooklynite Nov 2016 #9
If they do, it will be handled very promptly Ms. Toad Nov 2016 #12
That is always a question - who will enforce this ban? rurallib Nov 2016 #16
Take pictures DK504 Nov 2016 #29
YAY!!!!!! Sorceress Nov 2016 #5
So does this only apply to Ohio? pnwmom Nov 2016 #6
It was issued in a US district court SoCalNative Nov 2016 #7
Yes, Ohio only. I think because electios are run by States, The Dems have to sue in each state napi21 Nov 2016 #11
A district is a portion (in most instances) of the state. Ms. Toad Nov 2016 #13
Solid, legal proof that the republican party is engaging in voter intimidation. NBachers Nov 2016 #8
Awesome! Lawyers can do good work!!! kwenu Nov 2016 #17
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (in case citations, N.D. Ohio) elleng Nov 2016 #18
KnR Hekate Nov 2016 #19
Good. Now when they violate it, throw their sorry asses in the slam. malthaussen Nov 2016 #20
The GOP has a Consent Decree on this issue nation-wide up for review in 2017 Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2016 #21
Yeah, I saw that article, too. malthaussen Nov 2016 #34
no one will ever go to jail. just fines. flying-skeleton Nov 2016 #28
Well gee... PunksMom Nov 2016 #22
Here PDF of the Ohio Ruling & Order: Madam45for2923 Nov 2016 #23
There are laws for us, and laws for Trumpsters. They'll do it and know they'll get away with it. C Moon Nov 2016 #24
what difference will it make - NONE flying-skeleton Nov 2016 #25
K&R! red dog 1 Nov 2016 #27
Bring it on rethugs! MontanaMama Nov 2016 #30
Wow! Thank Goodness the Judge took their threats, intimidation, Cha Nov 2016 #31
I hope they arrest as many of the cheating asswipes as possible randr Nov 2016 #32
This is great news. RoccoRyg Nov 2016 #33
K & R Coyotl Nov 2016 #35
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #

brooklynite

(94,342 posts)
9. Not if I have anything to say about it...
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 04:42 PM
Nov 2016

My wife and I will be on the ground in Cleveland doing voter protection.

Ms. Toad

(33,992 posts)
12. If they do, it will be handled very promptly
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 04:51 PM
Nov 2016

by Democratic observers.

There were processes in place long before this court ruling; and this ruling makes it much easier since any disruption is in violation of the court order. Half of the legal battle is won.

If anyone witnesses intimidation, find your Democratic observer and report it. We'll handle the rest.

DK504

(3,847 posts)
29. Take pictures
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 06:44 PM
Nov 2016

Send them to electoral boards. Shooting video even better...get their asses thrown in jail for federal voting violation laws.

SoCalNative

(4,613 posts)
7. It was issued in a US district court
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 04:40 PM
Nov 2016

so I would guess it applies to all the states within that district. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
11. Yes, Ohio only. I think because electios are run by States, The Dems have to sue in each state
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 04:46 PM
Nov 2016

they anticipate a problem.

Ms. Toad

(33,992 posts)
13. A district is a portion (in most instances) of the state.
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 04:52 PM
Nov 2016

Bu the decision should apply across Ohio.

(Circuits include multiple states.)

elleng

(130,732 posts)
18. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (in case citations, N.D. Ohio)
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 05:14 PM
Nov 2016

is the federal trial court for the northern half of Ohio. The court has courthouses in Cleveland (where the chief judge and most of the Northern District's judges have chambers), Toledo, Akron, and Youngstown.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_Ohio

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
20. Good. Now when they violate it, throw their sorry asses in the slam.
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 05:26 PM
Nov 2016

Court orders are meaningless without enforcement.

-- Mal

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,957 posts)
21. The GOP has a Consent Decree on this issue nation-wide up for review in 2017
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 05:41 PM
Nov 2016

The Democratic Party can make a strong case to get it renewed for 8 more years, which is a realistic possibility.

It has been in force since about 1982.

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
34. Yeah, I saw that article, too.
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 10:09 PM
Nov 2016

I'm sure it will be extended, because I think the GOP are constitutionally incapable of playing by the rules at this moment in history. But even if the decree is extended, they might still violate it at pleasure.

-- Mal

PunksMom

(440 posts)
22. Well gee...
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 05:51 PM
Nov 2016

Are people finally growing tired of tRumps bullshit? It's about time, & I hope the other states listed have the same success!

flying-skeleton

(696 posts)
25. what difference will it make - NONE
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 06:16 PM
Nov 2016

Once the election is over .... democrats can cry all they want .... the republicans (if they win) will be laughing in the whitehouse.

MontanaMama

(23,295 posts)
30. Bring it on rethugs!
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 06:47 PM
Nov 2016

I'm in training this weekend for GOTV calling, canvassing and voter protection up here in MT.

Mama is SO ready, willing and able to tangle with deplorables.

Cha

(296,848 posts)
31. Wow! Thank Goodness the Judge took their threats, intimidation,
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 07:10 PM
Nov 2016

and calls to interfere with voting seriously!

Thank you, SCN!

RoccoRyg

(260 posts)
33. This is great news.
Fri Nov 4, 2016, 07:20 PM
Nov 2016

I'm an election judge in Illinois and I know the rules. ANYONE can challenge your right to vote by claiming you aren't who you say you are, so I would advise you all to bring ID, a utility bill or whatever to foil their dirty tricks.

In this state, your signature is all that's required.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge Issues Restraining ...