Keith Ellison Praises Fidel Castro's "Mixed" Legacy: "He Stood Up For Peace And Freedom In Africa"
Source: Real Clear Politics
Candidate for chairman of the Democratic National Committee, Rep. Keith Ellison spoke with SiriusXMs Karen Hunter on Monday about the death of Fidel Castro and his priorities for the Democratic Party. He praised Castro's legacy in Cuba, saying that "he confronted people with a lot of power on behalf of people that didnt have any."
Read more: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/28/keith_ellison_praises_fidel_castros_mixed_legacy_he_confronted_people_with_a_lot_of_power.html
ericson00
(2,707 posts)harun
(11,348 posts)Mods before you hide my post, I am not disparaging an elected Dem like the OP is. Think about that.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)a "corporatist" as head of the party or president. I can't wait to hear.
emulatorloo
(44,098 posts)Or whatever the latest meaningless buzz word is.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)because they can't. The fact is it became a talking point against Clinton and Obama, despite the party's connection to moneyed interests from its inception. Yet only under a black man and a woman did "corporatism" and the "establishment" become a problem.
emulatorloo
(44,098 posts)There is no logic to what some here are advocating.
harun
(11,348 posts)Let's explore this. An exceedingly rich man who received 25% of his campaign funding from Wall Street, whose cabinet was staffed with the richest of the elite, and who presided over Jim Crow? Who ran a campaign far more conservative than what he ended up implementing. Who adopted New Deal programs only in response to widespread unrest and activism by farmers, veterans, the poor, and the Communist Party in the face of massive unemployment (25%) and starvation, and who cobbled together a safety net in order to save American capitalism? That's what you call non-corporatist?
What do you suppose FDR would have done if he'd faced 5% unemployment rather than 25%? If there had not been massive protests with the threat of social revolution? The Jim Crow would have stayed. The rest, not so much.
So it seems that Clinton's problem was not that she gave speeches for Wall Street banks but that she didn't come from the financial elite herself. If she had come from that level of extreme, inherited wealth, she might not be called a corporatist?
yurbud
(39,405 posts)BainsBane
(53,026 posts)about when this non-corporatist Democratic Party existed.
Are you happy with how Trump is draining the swamp? Five billionaires in a cabinet better than evil Hillary?
You continue to repeat propaganda generated and circulated to enable GOP victory. Even after Trump win's, you act like giving a few speeches to Wall Street is a serious problem unique to Hillary, even as Trump is prepare to sell off everything. I hope you're proud.
You played right into the hands of the GOP and Wall Street.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)The wealthy saw our interests as aligned with theirs in some areas.
Now even those who support the Democratic Party seem to see a lot less in common with the rest of us.
If the leaders of the Democratic Party think this "shut up and let us handle it" approach to their base is going to work, they will continue to get their as handed to them.
If the corporate wing of the party doesn't give up control or at least loosen the reins, pretty soon they won't have anyone left to talk down to.
And I would rather see the Democratic Party get its shit together than see a new party to the left form because we don't have time.
Did you write that as a joke.
Nancyswidower
(182 posts)Mods..before you hide my post....research the death Che sprinkled around him.."Think about that"
Cha
(297,029 posts)Just who are you trying to disparage with the insulting buzz word "corporatist"?
THINK ABOUT THAT.
harun
(11,348 posts)Because Progressives aren't afraid of the Fox News created myth's about Keith Ellison.
Cha
(297,029 posts)INdemo
(6,994 posts)Republicans would have a field day with this one.
Maybe we should now focus on having Elizabeth Warren as DNC chair?
LisaM
(27,800 posts)It's a full time job, or should be.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)He has a very strong civil rights record.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)because clearly, the "Emerging Democratic Majority" Judis-Texeira strategy has blown up in the Democratic Party's face pretty badly not just in 2016, but over the years in the House, Senate, and state legislatures. It only worked for Obama, in part because he attracted many voters who wouldn't stay engaged past his 2nd term.
They also wont see a dime from me. I want Howard Dean.
ericson00
(2,707 posts)is a mass exodus of progressives into another party. They'll come up with some BS reason Ellison didn't get it, Sanders (still not a Democrat) will claim he was slighted, and he'll go. I'd rather this not happen, but sadly, that's the only thing I can gleam from a Castro-lover and Israel-hater like Ellison.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)think it isn't popular? Just how popular was Bernie Sanders Progressive movement?
The DNC as well as many Democrats in Congress are owned by Corporate interests and DWS* was the Republican lite that welcomed their contributions.
*DNC drops ban on lobbyist, PAC money
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/02/12/dnc-drops-ban-lobbyists-pac-money/80291908/
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)do something so self destructive as to destroy a party that allowed him to run for the nomination under its banner. I have no clue what ellison is about other than he didn't denounce screwy Louis Farrakhan until he absolutely had to. I don't need another reason to think he's an asshole.
emulatorloo
(44,098 posts)IMHO Ellison is not that way, he's a good guy. That being said, chairs a full time job and you can't make gaffes like this.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Haven't seen anyone proposed yet who can match that record.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)was all Dean. I have also never seen anyone take on the morons on TV better than Howard. He never loses his cool and is too smart to get walked into a corner. He's who we need.
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)...wasn't "political suicide"?
Archae
(46,311 posts)Castro was good buddies with many of the worst of the worst in Africa, including Idi Amin and Mugabe.
!!!!
pbmus
(12,422 posts)Revolucion en los estados unidos!
pbmus
(12,422 posts)People murdered by his political machine...and if you deny that he had political prisoners then you must be one of the jailers....
Me.
(35,454 posts)DFW
(54,329 posts)I don't care HOW right Ellison might have been. A statement like that is red meat to grind for half the voters in this country, and was about as politically astute as Gerald Ford saying "There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe" in the debate with Jimmy Carter, which probably cost Ford the 1976 election.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)Fact is he ins't old enough to remember Castro's ties to Nazi's and the evil leaders of the World.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/centralamericaandthecaribbean/cuba/9609851/Fidel-Castro-recruited-Nazi-SS-members-to-train-troops-during-Cuban-missile-crisis.html
DFW
(54,329 posts)It will only be ammunition for the Republicans nationally if he gets a national position of prominence. If someone else becomes DNC Chair, his statement's usefulness to the Republicans vanishes in a puff of smoke.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)"He also did jail people who were political critics of his, he also did not allow
free speech
Its a mixed bag."
He could have mentioned that he also persecuted homosexuals and others. But whatever. The "mixed bag" assessment is pretty much universal right now.
DFW
(54,329 posts)The media will only quote the first line ad nauseam. Ellison should have thought before he spoke. He just put a big target on his back with a sign saying, "Republicans shoot HERE!"
melman
(7,681 posts)When someone "did jail people who were political critics of his, he also did not allow
free speech"..that's their bag. I don't need to know anything else about that bag.
harun
(11,348 posts)hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)We need to make sure they don't have too many things that the GOP can use to destroy them.
Gothmog
(145,046 posts)If nothing else, I strongly believe that the DNC chair should be a full time job. In addition, Ellison is too tied to Sanders and that is a big negative
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Do you have a preferred candidate?
demosincebirth
(12,536 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)in case people forgot.
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)I haven't forgotten the brutality of Joans Savimbi, UNITA, and Rhodesia. No government had clean hands when meddling in African politics.
ericson00
(2,707 posts)additionally, UNITA > FLNA, given the Cold War and the horrible record of communist regimes, which lingered far longer than non-communist ones.
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)Unenforced sanctions, allowing large numbers of US mercenaries to participate in the war, allowing financial support from citizens and corporations. This all amounts to support for the Rhodesian state. This shouldn't be shocking or hard to believe considering support provided to South Africa during this time as well.
If you prefer right-wing UNITA that's your call I guess. They were also the preferred combatant of the Ford/Reagan/Bush I administrations, Kissinger, CIA, and Heritage Foundation.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)demosincebirth
(12,536 posts)BainsBane
(53,026 posts)That he doesn't know that is concerning. That's the kind of thing you can get away with when you represent Minneapolis in congress, but not when you're supposed to be heading a nation-wide party.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)ramapo
(4,588 posts)What a politically moronic thing to say
ericson00
(2,707 posts)we really shouldn't have any such people as President, let alone a chair of a major political party
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Even CBS's sendoff said pretty much the same thing.
ericson00
(2,707 posts)conservative. One can be a progressive, a center-left moderate (like I am) and be a patriot too. Thus, fuck Castro.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)If I'm not a patriot for recognizing that so be it.
ericson00
(2,707 posts)I think the moral and best choice is obvious. Castro shoulda thought about that.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)The least bad choice, lesser of two evils. This applies to politics as well. Life and politics are not "Imagine" and "smile on your brother."
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)I had no idea you supported him so strongly
gordianot
(15,237 posts)It plays into the hands of GOP types who are willing to praise a former KGB officer who in turn praises the mentally ill autocrat recently elected. One megalomaniac does not cancel out another.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Seriously stop
jman0war
(35 posts)This article is high on hyperbole, low on substance.
The 'praise' he gave Castro was : "He praised Castro's legacy in Cuba, saying that "he confronted people with a lot of power on behalf of people that didnt have any."
But this is not very controversial.
Castro led a revolution comprised of penniless, rag-tag guerillas with little weaponry against a brutal and totalitarian US backed dictator.
Scruffy1
(3,254 posts)Do this and you will lose. I know Keith Personally and his views are very nuanced, not sound bight crap. His Congressional District has many Palestinian refugees who have become my friends and neighbors. Although you might not agree with Keith and there Progressive Caucus 100% the Party really needs them. These are the people who are activist and do a lot more than write a letter. They are the ones that get the young voters out.They are the ones who will knock on doors and make phone calls. I get the feeling some Democrats like losing. I never have liked it.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)When the Democratic Party cuts someone loose because the GOP merely accuses them of something, it makes the accusation look true and the Democrats look weak and foolish.
A pretty simple defense would be, "What was Cuba like BEFORE the revolution? Did Castro overthrow a democracy where everyone prospered? Or a dictator running a sweatshop, casinos, and whorehouses?"
Judi Lynn
(160,515 posts)World Net Daily?
Someone should have mentioned to you DU requests you use mainstream sources.
That probably would not include right-wing political versions of the news.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Why is it inadmissable to say "he was a mixed bag-repression and gains for the people at the same time"?
Why does it have to be unqualified denunciation or nothing?
Vinca
(50,250 posts)Fidel was a very bad man with a few good ideas. The person who most reminds me of him today is Trump.