Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 03:44 PM Dec 2016

GOP Senators To Re-Introduce Anti-Gay 'Religious Freedom' Bill Next Year

Source: Talking Points Memo

By CAITLIN MACNEAL Published DECEMBER 12, 2016, 1:44 PM EDT

The Republican sponsors of a so-called "religious freedom" bill plan on re-introducing the legislation next year in the hopes that Donald Trump's election will boost chances for the bill to be signed into law, Buzzfeed News reported.

The bill, the First Amendment Defense Act, would ban the federal government from revoking tax exemptions from or denying grants to individuals or corporations with religious or "moral" beliefs opposing same-sex marriage.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) introduced the legislation last year, and a counterpart measure was filed in the House, but neither bill made it to a full vote in either the House or Senate.

"Hopefully November’s results will give us the momentum we need to get this done next year," Conn Carroll, a spokesman for Lee, told Buzzfeed.

Cruz also told Buzzfeed News that Trump's election gives him hope that the bill could gain support in 2017.

-snip-

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/first-amendment-defense-act-trump

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP Senators To Re-Introduce Anti-Gay 'Religious Freedom' Bill Next Year (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2016 OP
Nope Renew Deal Dec 2016 #1
"Sorry, we do not serve christians here" due to our moral beliefs. that will be ok too msongs Dec 2016 #2
They just can't stop with the misery katmondoo Dec 2016 #3
When it comes to any legislation after 1/20/17 mountain grammy Dec 2016 #4
Just tell the baker that the cake is for greymattermom Dec 2016 #5
but..but..he held up a rainbow flag that one time! Blue Shoes Dec 2016 #6
There was a zippo in the other hand. Be not fooled. jmowreader Dec 2016 #13
Time to post signs on restaurant windows: No Fundamentalist Christians allowed. BigDemVoter Dec 2016 #7
gamble with someone else's freedom, prepare to lose your own 0rganism Dec 2016 #8
That's the f***ing ticket deversion and deflections turbinetree Dec 2016 #9
I Morally Object SDJay Dec 2016 #10
Bacon! azureblue Dec 2016 #11
yes Angry Dragon Dec 2016 #16
These people are out of their F-ing mind. YOHABLO Dec 2016 #12
Goin' nowhere. janx Dec 2016 #14
Why do they want special laws?? Angry Dragon Dec 2016 #15

msongs

(67,395 posts)
2. "Sorry, we do not serve christians here" due to our moral beliefs. that will be ok too
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 03:50 PM
Dec 2016

(or pick any other identity group you care to not serve)

mountain grammy

(26,619 posts)
4. When it comes to any legislation after 1/20/17
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 04:18 PM
Dec 2016

it'll have to get Putin's ok.. pretty sure he'll love this one.

BigDemVoter

(4,149 posts)
7. Time to post signs on restaurant windows: No Fundamentalist Christians allowed.
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 04:37 PM
Dec 2016

I write that in semi-jest, but following THEIR logic.. . . ..

turbinetree

(24,695 posts)
9. That's the f***ing ticket deversion and deflections
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 04:51 PM
Dec 2016

to hurt people in this country while we really have a Constitutional crises developing with one big serial predator: and the "news" media not and I repeat NOT hammering these people on this Article in the Constitution, and why they aren't holding hearings but they just have to inflict harm on people for there sexual orientation, like there nothing else better to do


Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution contains what is known as the Foreign Emoluments Clause, which reads, “no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”


FU with Ted Cruz, and Mike Lee yet---------------- fascists, making over $174,000 a year getting ready for another tax payer pay raise and they want to have theocracy


SDJay

(1,089 posts)
10. I Morally Object
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 04:51 PM
Dec 2016

to anyone who watches Fox News for information. Sorry, I won't do business with folks like you.

This type of thinking is exactly right. People with functional IQs will need to do the same thing that the Satanists did in places like OK. Expose the cynicism, and do it relentlessly.

azureblue

(2,146 posts)
11. Bacon!
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 05:16 PM
Dec 2016

Leviticus clearly says that eating pork is a sin. Can we use "religious freedom", to go flog Ted for eating bacon?

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
12. These people are out of their F-ing mind.
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 06:16 PM
Dec 2016

The country has moved on. Most of us take care of each other, we don't hate, we get along, we embrace all walks of life. And these people want to take us back to the stone age. I say bring it on .. and you'll see what happens.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GOP Senators To Re-Introd...