Energy Dept. rejects Trumps request to name climate change workers, who remain worried
Source: Washington Post
Federal Insider
Energy Dept. rejects Trumps request to name climate change workers, who remain worried
By Joe Davidson Columnist December 13 at 7:00 AM
https://twitter.com/JoeDavidsonWP
Global warming its a hoax. ... Donald Trump has said that more than once. ... So its understandable that the request by the president-elects transition team for the names of individual Energy Department employees and contractors who worked on the issue makes them worry that the trick could be on them.
There is major concern amongst my members, said Jeff Eagan, president of the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) chapter at the departments headquarters building in Washington. Hes also a 17-year Energy employee, but was speaking in his union capacity. I have received lots of calls, emails, messages expressing shock and dismay.
The scientists and their colleagues at Energy know global warming is real. What they dont know is what Trump might do to those whose work has been in line with the science and the Obama administration, which has spoken about the urgent imperatives of climate change. ... Perhaps Trumps crew will do nothing. Trump more recently has said he has an open mind about global warming, so maybe hes discarding his flat-earth approach to the subject. Nonetheless, the transition teams request to provide a list of all Department of Energy employees or contractors who have attended certain climate change meetings casts a shroud of apprehension over the workforce. The transition team ignored a request for comment.
....
On the question of providing names, Energy officials resolutely rejected the request, while reassuring workers. ... The Department of Energy received significant feedback from our workforce throughout the department, including the National Labs, following the release of the transition teams questions. Some of the questions asked left many in our workforce unsettled, said Eben Burnham-Snyder, a department spokesman. Our career workforce, including our contractors and employees at our labs, comprise the backbone of DOE (Department of Energy) and the important work our department does to benefit the American people. We are going to respect the professional and scientific integrity and independence of our employees at our labs and across our department. ... We will be forthcoming with all publically-available information with the transition team. We will not be providing any individual names to the transition team. Burnham-Snyders email had the last sentence in boldface for emphasis.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/12/13/energy-dept-rejects-trumps-request-to-name-climate-change-workers-who-remain-worried/
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)DK504
(3,847 posts)the lovely actions of the J. Edgar Hoover years. He was as terrifying as all the worst, he just couldn't commit mass murder.
Blue Shoes
(220 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I wonder if he could really do this. I guess congress would have to go along and they might. I definitely think the workers at the energy department should worry. The least that may happen is a decrease in funding for the energy department.
groundloop
(11,518 posts)They'll toe the party line at least for a while anyway. Eventually the stench might get to them and they'll go their own way, but for the foreseeable future they'll march in lockstep and put party ahead of country as they always do.
Javaman
(62,517 posts)what I'm waiting for is the U.S.'s version of "article 58". it was a "law" in stalin's soviet union that basically allowed anyone to be arrested for anything under the guise of anti-soviet actions.
Ligyron
(7,627 posts)Buckle up, it's going to be a rough ride.
bucolic_frolic
(43,128 posts)All power to the Apparatchniki to execute Five Year Plan
C_U_L8R
(44,998 posts)really bad things can happen when 'oops' is your strategy.
Can you even imagine this clown (or his cheat colored commander)
walking into Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, Brookhaven, Lawrence Livermore
or any other facility and having the slightest clue of what they do?
longship
(40,416 posts)Add Argonne Nat'l Lab to your list. I worked there in the 70's. It was one of the country's largest fissionable plutonium repositories at the time. And yes, security was rather tight.
But idiot Perry wants to eliminate the DOE.
eShirl
(18,490 posts)sweetroxie
(776 posts)But I wasn't one. And so it began.
world wide wally
(21,740 posts)What could go wrong?
He's going to bring our jobs back.
Right?
Javaman
(62,517 posts)the energy dept workers and I did nothing.
I'm not joking here, I'm deadly serious.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Except for the Scottish golf course where he filed a lawsuit to build a seawall because of global warming.
The rest are all just licensed or mortgaged up the wazoo. They're probably "underwater" in mortgage terms already. Soon they will be physically underwater.
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)Eventually he'll get the message.
lame54
(35,284 posts)IronLionZion
(45,427 posts)they'll say these agencies aren't doing enough work, and then eliminate them completely.
We all need to repeatedly tell Trump and the GOP to go screw themselves