Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

swag

(26,487 posts)
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 11:35 AM Dec 2016

Pipeline 150 miles from Dakota Access protests leaks 176,000 gallons

Source: CNN

(CNN) Activists who have demonstrated for months against the Dakota Access Pipeline may have some fuel to justify their protests.
A spill has occurred 150 miles from Cannon Ball, North Dakota, where protesters have fought construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

State officials estimate 4,200 barrels of crude oil, or 176,000 gallons, have leaked from the Belle Fourche Pipeline in Billings County.

Of that amount, 130,000 gallons of oil has flowed into Ash Coulee Creek, while the rest leaked onto a hillside, said Bill Suess, spill investigation program manager at the North Dakota Department of Health. Built in the 1980s, the pipeline is 6 inches in diameter and transports about 1,000 barrels of oil daily, he said. The leak happened December 5.

"Any time it gets into water, we respond differently and we take it more seriously," Suess said. He said more than 100 people are working to clean up the spill. Investigators are still trying to determine the cause, he said.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/13/us/pipeline-spill-north-dakota/index.html?sr=twCNN121416pipeline-spill-north-dakota1142AMVODtopPhoto&linkId=32367416

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pipeline 150 miles from Dakota Access protests leaks 176,000 gallons (Original Post) swag Dec 2016 OP
Comrade Casino Trump (R), the Koch Bros. & Repulican Cabal O'Cronies intend to... Achilleaze Dec 2016 #1
Wish I could recommend an individual reply agalisgv Dec 2016 #12
This is indicative of the company that installed it ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #2
I shall call thee ZoomBubba swag Dec 2016 #3
Look, I know many people here hate ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #4
Well, I'm sure you're aware of recent good news for workers swag Dec 2016 #7
To be fair ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #10
I think most on DU recognize what you are saying. Ilsa Dec 2016 #8
I'm in agreement that the weaning is necessary ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #9
In vitro meat can't get here fast enough, IMO! That alone will drastically cut greenhouse gases. JudyM Dec 2016 #14
The contribution of livestock to greenhouse gases ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #21
I guess you did not work on Keystone - three-quarters of the welds required redoing - SCARY womanofthehills Dec 2016 #16
I'm not sure what your point is ... ZoomBubba Dec 2016 #20
AAAHHHHH!!!!! Enough with the oil and pipelines etc. Clean ENERGY NOW! Equinox Moon Dec 2016 #5
corp lies like a rug "Company: Equipment Didn't Detect North Dakota Oil Leak" link Sunlei Dec 2016 #6
The "state officals" are in on it Equinox Moon Dec 2016 #13
Companies have been dumping radioactive fracking waste all over N Dakota - sides of roads, in fields womanofthehills Dec 2016 #15
I grieve at this news you posted Equinox Moon Dec 2016 #17
Thank you for the sweet words Equinox Moon womanofthehills Dec 2016 #19
Water is life agalisgv Dec 2016 #11
Here is some good news from Seattle! Equinox Moon Dec 2016 #18

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
1. Comrade Casino Trump (R), the Koch Bros. & Repulican Cabal O'Cronies intend to...
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 11:46 AM
Dec 2016

shove this pipeline up America's keister all the same. There's megabucks in it for them. And they could care less about the consequences to people or planet.

ZoomBubba

(289 posts)
2. This is indicative of the company that installed it ...
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 11:47 AM
Dec 2016

... not the industry itself. The True family's oil companies have a track record of track record of trying to skid on safety regulations: http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/comm/reports/enforce/documents/520145017W/520145017W_warning%20letter_11212014.pdf

I will clarify that I have worked in the pipeline industry and the company I worked for went past what regulations required, using high quality pipe and limiting alteration of the surrounding environment. There are some bad ones and I don't believe they do things out of the goodness of their hearts, but I don't see it as the big Satan of today. I would actually like to go back if work expands again as the big pay checks made my life, and in turn my family's, easier. So, go ahead and call me whatever name you want.

ZoomBubba

(289 posts)
4. Look, I know many people here hate ...
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 12:38 PM
Dec 2016

... the industry along with pretty much all others centered around fossil fuels. I can understand that, but approaching it as if you plan to end it tomorrow is not the way to go about it. You have thousands of workers who depend on construction, inspections and everything in between .... and being outright hostile toward them isn't going to gain seats in red states nor help us retain the seats we have in those states. A lot of those guys working aren't anti-Democrat, but their priority is maintaining the lifestyle they've earned and saying "OK, it's over, go work at Walmart" just isn't going to cut it.

ZoomBubba

(289 posts)
10. To be fair ...
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:39 PM
Dec 2016

... oil is better than coal and natural gas is better than oil. I don't deny that those jobs will eventually vanish. I just think we need to prepare for it.

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
8. I think most on DU recognize what you are saying.
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:06 PM
Dec 2016

We still have manypractically and economically dependent on this industry. But you also realize that we'd like to see a weaning off the industry and towards renewables. It's frustrating to see us make progress, then get shoved five steps back. I know that the big corps have investments and research in renewables, which is to be encouraged.

Let's hope we don't make the planet unliveable before we get changed over.

Zoombubba! (Sounds like a cheer.)

ZoomBubba

(289 posts)
9. I'm in agreement that the weaning is necessary ...
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:37 PM
Dec 2016

... but I think that gets dominated by louder voices who are more photogenic or say things that get clicks. I'm not a fossil-fuel lover or someone who believes that we can replace it over night.

The combination of regulations and market demand have really spurred the change faster than either alone could. Right now, we're looking at the end of coal in the US in probably less than two decades. I'm sure oil will eventually follow as its probability decreases. But natural gas is probably going to be here a bit longer as it is so cheap to extract.

I'd like to think we could tell the coal workers and other field guys in the fossil fuel industries that they could just switch to renewable energy jobs. But I think pretty much everyone knows that's not going to happen. Renewables just don't require the same amount of work that fossil fuels do. And overall, manufacturing jobs and transport jobs are going to eventually belong to robots and drones, with service jobs probably following to an extent (cashiers jobs will probably shift to cleanliness and maintenance in auto-stores though). Far off, probably more than two decades, ag is going to be impacted by in vitro meat and those jobs will largely vanish too.

It seems that all the changes are inevitable, but we're not future proofing our workforce or preparing for a society where people far outnumber jobs.

JudyM

(29,233 posts)
14. In vitro meat can't get here fast enough, IMO! That alone will drastically cut greenhouse gases.
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 10:15 PM
Dec 2016

ZoomBubba

(289 posts)
21. The contribution of livestock to greenhouse gases ...
Fri Dec 16, 2016, 10:35 AM
Dec 2016

... is probably the most ignored part of it. I blame a lot of that on the romanticized view of farming and fear of GMOs, not to mention general ignorance of factory farming. But traditional farming of livestock is also very damaging. I really don't know how longer it can be avoided until it gets the spotlight.

womanofthehills

(8,698 posts)
16. I guess you did not work on Keystone - three-quarters of the welds required redoing - SCARY
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 10:35 PM
Dec 2016
“From the start of welding,” the PHMSA wrote in a Sept. 26, 2013, letter (PDF), “TransCanada experienced a high weld rejection rate.” (That is, ultrasonic testing on the welds holding the pipes together determined they were not up to snuff.) “During the first week 26.8 percent of the welds required repairs, 32.0 percent the second week, 72.2 percent the third week, and 45.0 percent the fourth week. On September 25, 2012, TransCanada stopped the Spread 3 welding after 205 of the 425 welds, or 48.2 percent required repairs.”

During one week in September, 72 percent, or almost three-quarters, of the welds on the “safest pipeline in the world” required redoing. (TransCanada, for its part, says it has addressed the PHMSA’s concerns, and you can read its response in writing here [PDF].) Throughout the Keystone XL fight, TransCanada has maintained that the chance of a spill is remote, and that its pipelines are state-of-the-art. But the implications of TransCanada’s inferior welding on its Southern leg are precisely why the Keystone XL has met with such fierce resistance on the ground in Nebraska. It’s there the planned pipe will pass over the Ogallala aquifer, which irrigates much of the Great Plains, and directly and indirectly supports millions of American jobs—and that’s not counting all the drinking water.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-05-30/the-real-reason-keystone-xl-might-fail

ZoomBubba

(289 posts)
20. I'm not sure what your point is ...
Fri Dec 16, 2016, 10:32 AM
Dec 2016

... the PHSMA did their job and caught the flaws. That's what they're supposed to do.

It does nothing to negate the necessity of pipelines to transport oil and gas.

Equinox Moon

(6,344 posts)
5. AAAHHHHH!!!!! Enough with the oil and pipelines etc. Clean ENERGY NOW!
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 06:45 PM
Dec 2016

This is but one of many spills that happen and the public does not learn of it.

Proof for Standing Rock!

FYI - DAPL is for oil that will be sold overseas! Not used in the USA.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
6. corp lies like a rug "Company: Equipment Didn't Detect North Dakota Oil Leak" link
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 07:06 PM
Dec 2016

Pictures by the corp of the exact 'leak' or its a lie about the amount & the 'clean-up' , it's a 6 miles long 'leak' and must have been missed for DAYS.


Why don't 'State Officials' sue the shit out of these corporations for damages to the land and water?

Company: Equipment Didn't Detect North Dakota Oil Leak link

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/pipeline-spills-176000-gallons-oil-north-dakota-creek-44143592

Equinox Moon

(6,344 posts)
13. The "state officals" are in on it
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 08:58 PM
Dec 2016

The republican governor has been horrible with all of this. He has taken sides with the corp oil, not the people.

I have come to believe these people are wired differently, and have no consciousness and soul that they are in touch with. (oilmongers and repubs)

womanofthehills

(8,698 posts)
15. Companies have been dumping radioactive fracking waste all over N Dakota - sides of roads, in fields
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 10:28 PM
Dec 2016

Where Has the Waste Gone? Fracking Results in Illegal Dumping of Radioactive Toxins

The short answer is, no one knows. Illegal radioactive waste-dumping in North Dakota is widespread. Because oil companies were not legally allowed to dispose of radioactive oil field waste that was higher than 5 picocuries in landfills, companies trucked the waste to licensed facilities in Idaho, Colorado and Montana. Shipping costs ate into profits and some companies began dumping radioactive waste in abandoned buildings, on the side of dirt roads or in the middle of fields. Others concealed contaminated materials in non-radioactive loads in order to sneak them into landfills.


http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/38022-where-has-the-waste-gone-fracking-results-in-illegal-dumping-of-radioactive-toxins

Equinox Moon

(6,344 posts)
17. I grieve at this news you posted
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 10:52 PM
Dec 2016

How can these people sleep at night?
Answer: they are unconscious and probably socio-pathic. It is an epidemic that needs to be addressed. These are people that need help.

*************************
Hello, 'Woman Of The Hills'
Your name carries with it a sense of who you are. Someone I would feel respect for.

Nice to meet you.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pipeline 150 miles from D...