Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 01:56 PM Dec 2016

Ryan's Crackdown on Protests May Not Be Constitutional

Source: Political Wire

December 28, 2016 By Taegan Goddard

[link:http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/paul-ryan-livestream-constitution-232994Politico]: Paul Ryans new crackdown against protests on the House floor a direct response to the Democrats gun-control sit-in last summer is prompting questions from experts in both parties about its constitutionality. As part of a House rules package members will vote to approve in early January, House GOP leaders want to empower the sergeant-at-arms to fine lawmakers up to $2,500 for shooting video or taking photos on the chamber floor. But experts say Ryans proposal may run afoul of Article 1 of the Constitution, which says each House may punish its Members for disorderly behavior.

For more than 200 years that has been interpreted to mean any contested sanctions against lawmakers must be approved by the full House with a floor vote, attorneys steeped in congressional legal matters say.

###

Read more: https://politicalwire.com/2016/12/28/ryans-crackdown-protests-may-not-constitutional/



A 'puke doing something unconstitutional!?!?!? Nah, never!
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ryan's Crackdown on Protests May Not Be Constitutional (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2016 OP
Its to bad when they do shit like this that they know will likely be ruled as unconstitutional that cstanleytech Dec 2016 #1
What does the GOP care about the Constitution? It's their country now. C Moon Dec 2016 #2
Exactly liberalmike27 Dec 2016 #4
+3000 Angry Dragon Dec 2016 #5
Since many reps actually have budget problems, we Hortensis Dec 2016 #3
So the rethugs don't want people to see on tv them voting to eliminate social security and Medicare? kimbutgar Dec 2016 #6

cstanleytech

(26,280 posts)
1. Its to bad when they do shit like this that they know will likely be ruled as unconstitutional that
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 02:18 PM
Dec 2016

there isnt any real risk to themselves. Maybe if they could be sued and risk losing all of their assets including any retirement benefits from the government that they might have gotten they might actually take a moment before going ahead with this BS.

liberalmike27

(2,479 posts)
4. Exactly
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 04:19 PM
Dec 2016

Exactly my thought--you realize the Republicans, as much as they pretend to care about it, do not care about the Constitution, unless they figure it can stop a good thing Democrats want to do. If it steals rights, shuts down left wing talk radio, or takes away rights given under the fourth amendment, they're just fine with it. Anything that helps them, it's OK.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
3. Since many reps actually have budget problems, we
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 04:02 PM
Dec 2016

were planning to donate to a fund to pay as many fines as they have the guts to run up. But Ryan lacking the power to follow through would be better.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ryan's Crackdown on Prote...