U.S. court upholds Obama-era retirement advice rule
Source: Reuters
A U.S. federal judge on Wednesday upheld an Obama-era rule designed to avoid conflicts of interests when brokers give retirement advice, in a possible setback for President Donald Trump's efforts to scale back government regulation.
The stinging 81-page ruling comes just days after Trump ordered the Labor Department to review the "fiduciary" rule - a move widely interpreted as an effort to delay or kill the regulation.
The decision by Chief Judge Barbara Lynn for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas is a stunning defeat for the business and financial services industry groups that had sought to overturn it.
And while it is not expected to stop the Labor Department from delaying the rule's April 10 compliance deadline while it conducts the review, some legal experts say it could make it more difficult for the Labor Department to find a way to justify scrapping or significantly altering the rule.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-labor-fiduciary-idUSKBN15N2HF
elleng
(130,731 posts)Squinch
(50,911 posts)bad for them but line your own pockets."
How can that be controversial? They are so overt in their dishonesty and their absolute support of the dishonesty of others. It's sick.
In the Repugnant mindset anything that actually requires you to do something ethical is wrong and needs to be abolished because its not the legislatures job to tell people not to cheat their clients.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Right and moral and just. One standard. Right or wrong. No "alternatives."
The bending force in the Arc!
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Glad to hear this.
wishstar
(5,268 posts)Hopefully the publicity will help consumers be more aware of the problem and ask more questions of brokers trying to sell financial products
Nitram
(22,765 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,290 posts)Hitler declared Great Britain "a nation of shopkeepers." Those shopkeepers rose to the occasion.
Nitram
(22,765 posts)I should have said "the only element of the government."
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,290 posts)mobeau69
(11,132 posts)The arguments against this rule were laughable. How much of the pie do these greedy bastards need?
Nitram
(22,765 posts)your cookies, cake, and ice cream.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)BREMPRO
(2,331 posts)Shows just how out of touch T-rump and the R's are with the people, and overtly influenced by the financial services lobby. What happened to "drain the swamp"??Upside-down government. It's " WE THE PEOPLE!" Not "we the banks..."
not fooled
(5,801 posts)can't unleash the financial predators as much as he wants.