Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HAB911

(8,867 posts)
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 08:23 AM Feb 2017

U.S. court upholds Obama-era retirement advice rule

Source: Reuters

A U.S. federal judge on Wednesday upheld an Obama-era rule designed to avoid conflicts of interests when brokers give retirement advice, in a possible setback for President Donald Trump's efforts to scale back government regulation.

The stinging 81-page ruling comes just days after Trump ordered the Labor Department to review the "fiduciary" rule - a move widely interpreted as an effort to delay or kill the regulation.

The decision by Chief Judge Barbara Lynn for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas is a stunning defeat for the business and financial services industry groups that had sought to overturn it.

And while it is not expected to stop the Labor Department from delaying the rule's April 10 compliance deadline while it conducts the review, some legal experts say it could make it more difficult for the Labor Department to find a way to justify scrapping or significantly altering the rule.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-labor-fiduciary-idUSKBN15N2HF

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Squinch

(50,911 posts)
2. Jesus. The law essentially said "don't put your clients into investments that are
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 08:58 AM
Feb 2017

bad for them but line your own pockets."

How can that be controversial? They are so overt in their dishonesty and their absolute support of the dishonesty of others. It's sick.

cstanleytech

(26,229 posts)
4. Easy.
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 09:09 AM
Feb 2017

In the Repugnant mindset anything that actually requires you to do something ethical is wrong and needs to be abolished because its not the legislatures job to tell people not to cheat their clients.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
3. The Third Branch of our government!
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 09:02 AM
Feb 2017


Right and moral and just. One standard. Right or wrong. No "alternatives."

The bending force in the Arc!

wishstar

(5,268 posts)
6. Good- the delay provides more publicity to R's attemps to allow crooks free reign
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 09:44 AM
Feb 2017

Hopefully the publicity will help consumers be more aware of the problem and ask more questions of brokers trying to sell financial products

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,290 posts)
9. Let's not be so quick to write off its citizens.
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 10:08 AM
Feb 2017

Hitler declared Great Britain "a nation of shopkeepers." Those shopkeepers rose to the occasion.

Nitram

(22,765 posts)
10. Yes, you're right. that occurred to me right after I posted the above. Thanks for pointing it out.
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 10:22 AM
Feb 2017

I should have said "the only element of the government."

mobeau69

(11,132 posts)
8. We're on the board.
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 10:04 AM
Feb 2017

The arguments against this rule were laughable. How much of the pie do these greedy bastards need?

Nitram

(22,765 posts)
11. It doesn't matter what we "need." It's what we want! We will eat all yourpie and then start on
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 10:24 AM
Feb 2017

your cookies, cake, and ice cream.

BREMPRO

(2,331 posts)
13. That they want to overturn this common sense obviously beneficial regulation
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 10:50 AM
Feb 2017

Shows just how out of touch T-rump and the R's are with the people, and overtly influenced by the financial services lobby. What happened to "drain the swamp"??Upside-down government. It's " WE THE PEOPLE!" Not "we the banks..."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. court upholds Obama-...