Federal judge calls into question 'legitimacy' of Donald Trumps presidency
Source: RawStory
U.S. District Judge Dan Polster called into question the legitimacy of Donald Trumps presidency this week after the president suggested that a federal judge who ruled against him was illegitimate.
Speaking to Clevelands Anti-Defamation League on Wednesday night, Polster expressed disappointment in the presidents tweet that attacked U.S. District Court Judge James Robart as a so-called judge for blocking a ban on travel from seven majority-Muslim countries.
This is serious business, because you start calling into question the legitimacy of someone, that undermines the whole system, all right? Polster told the audience, according to Cleveland.com.
I think to say it publicly, thats his right, he added. But it calls into question, and some might even say forfeits, his or her own legitimacy. So Ill leave it at that. Its an important question, but thats how I feel. Polster noted that the countrys founders had set up a system of check and balances because they were fearful of a president who might want to be a king or dictator.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/federal-judge-calls-into-question-legitimacy-of-donald-trumps-presidency/
elleng
(130,865 posts)he added. But it calls into question, and some might even say forfeits, his or her own legitimacy. So Ill leave it at that. Its an important question, but thats how I feel. Polster noted that the countrys founders had set up a system of check and balances because they were fearful of a president who might want to be a king or dictator.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)is clear violation of His Oath of Office he took be it said public or private, (unless he had his fingers or toes crossed when h took the Oath. ) that be an impeachable offinse. !
moreland01
(738 posts)Why would this Judge say that unless he planned to do something about it. Big talk. Let's see some action, Judge Polster!
secondwind
(16,903 posts)Hekate
(90,645 posts)...without a case being brought before them. The 9th Circuit judges "did something" because the State of Washington sued.
Like the rest of us...
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)I've thought this for some time. They exaggerate and twist. Clickbait.
This article is just one example of many.
progressoid
(49,978 posts)I often have more than one tab open in Firefox, but I can't have more than a couple of theirs open. Too many ads I think.
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,975 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)and Bill Palmer report is also clickbait.
We on the left have our own versions off-the-wall sites
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)I think
The River
(2,615 posts)to remove our wannabe dictator because 52% of Congress has no interest
in being a check or balance. They are complicit enablers.
If the courts don't do it by 2018, the voters will do it when both the
House and Senate have a Democratic majority.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)at least Collins and Murkowski are willing to join us if they hear from their constituents that they should. Any more reasonable R's?
At this point, I'm wishing we could bring back pork barrel spending.
JudyM
(29,233 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)as illegitimate putz's do as standard operating procedure.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)b/c I love using his own words. Sad!
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)I swear this feels like some badly written "B" level science fiction movie from the 70's more and more each day.
ailsagirl
(22,896 posts)"...question if he's even fully human"
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)if Trump's father was really an orangutan or something like that a few years ago? Trump sued Maher over it, but it was tossed out of court.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Doitnow
(1,103 posts)triron
(21,999 posts)bs artist is all he is.
MontanaMama
(23,307 posts)Simple and to the point. Makes him sound small....which he is.
ymetca
(1,182 posts)was the Citizens United ruling, and the long trend toward giving corporations the same rights as people.
That scares me more than Trump calling a particular judge a particular name.
The concept of a corporation was concocted long ago by the rich merchant class in cahoots with the royals, in order to keep their ill-gotten gains, while pushing the cleanup of their carnage onto the commons. It's as simple as that. And it's the source of most, if not all, the evils in the world right now.
Let's "incorporate" this conceptual "entity" so it gets the blame, and not us. Neat trick.
JudyM
(29,233 posts)I hope Scalia is rotting in the hell he believed in.
Ironic, looking back, that I used to think Rehnquist was about as bad as things could get. These days there's not even an effort to hide disgracefully gross partisanship and corporatist conflicts of interest.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)Much more could be accomplished when BOTH sides listened to each other respectfully. Now, bigotry, all kinds of discrimination, rudeness, sexual assault, crudeness, etc. are the acceptable norms.
BigBearJohn
(11,410 posts)Well fucking done!! Keep on digging that hole.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)you might think he knows he's in over his head and trying to self-destruct
Percy Cholmondeley
(74 posts)A candidate with the baggage, the lies, the stupid campaigning, the idiotic statements, the obvious ignorance, the traitorous leanings,the threatening behavior toward women, of a Landslide Donald, that candidate does not get elected in a fair election in the United States, and everybody knows it. The fact that the House Committee on Administration voted (as they were told to do) to kill the federal election watchdog commission proves beyond a doubt that we won't be seeing any fair, legitimate elections any time soon. It's going to take some prolonged strikes and other things that I can't bring myself to spell out.
PoiBoy
(1,542 posts)Good points and I totally agree...
Welcome to DU..!!
IronLionZion
(45,427 posts)and his birth certificate is fake
KewlKat
(5,624 posts)So I'm thinking it must be true.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)I predict full Trump meltdown in 3-2-1...