Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stonepounder

(4,033 posts)
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 07:16 PM Feb 2017

National Security Federal appeals court maintains suspension of Trumps immigration order

Source: Washington Post

A federal appeals court has maintained the freeze on President Trump’s controversial immigration order, meaning previously barred refugees and citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries can continue entering the U.S.

A panel with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld the ruling of U.S. District Judge James Robart, who had decided Friday that Trump’s temporary travel ban should be put on hold. The Department of Homeland Security soon suspended all enforcement of Trump’s controversial directive.

The Justice Department, representing the Trump administration, could now ask the Supreme Court — which often defers to the president on matters of immigration and national security — to intervene. The Supreme Court, though, remains one justice short, and many see it as ideologically split 4-4. A tie would keep in place whatever the appeals court decides.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-appeals-court-maintains-suspension-of-trumps-immigration-order/2017/02/09/e8526e70-ed47-11e6-9662-6eedf1627882_story.html?utm_term=.4c290f8ab7a7&tid=notifi_push_breaking-news&pushid=breaking-news_1486682050

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
National Security Federal appeals court maintains suspension of Trumps immigration order (Original Post) Stonepounder Feb 2017 OP
Woooooohoooooooo!!!!! Dopers_Greed Feb 2017 #1
YYYyyyyeeesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss! lindysalsagal Feb 2017 #2
Trump is handed another defeat! GreydeeThos Feb 2017 #3
Tomorrow morning's Twitter tirade will be doozy. Eugene Feb 2017 #4
Unanimous! stopwastingmymoney Feb 2017 #5
Today's PPP polls show Trump supporters are OK with him OVERULING JUDGES DECISIONS pdxDem Feb 2017 #6
WTF????? Cadfael Feb 2017 #7
They can be okay with whatever they want, but DesertRat Feb 2017 #9
That's why we now have Betsy DeVoss as SecEd. Stonepounder Feb 2017 #10
They're fubared .. we knew that. Cha Feb 2017 #12
Good to see that the US Judicial Branch is working when the Executive Branch has failed. n/t Little Tich Feb 2017 #8
They smacked him pretty hard. Stonepounder Feb 2017 #11
YAY! And, who was that Temp AG who went ahead with Cha Feb 2017 #13

pdxDem

(12 posts)
6. Today's PPP polls show Trump supporters are OK with him OVERULING JUDGES DECISIONS
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 10:32 PM
Feb 2017

51% of Trump supporters according to Feb 7-8 PPP poll say they think Trump should be able to overturn decisions by judges that he disagrees with.

WTF

DesertRat

(27,995 posts)
9. They can be okay with whatever they want, but
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 11:18 PM
Feb 2017

he's not a dictator. I think that he and his supporters need to brush up on their middle school civics.
This might help. https://bensguide.gpo.gov/

Stonepounder

(4,033 posts)
11. They smacked him pretty hard.
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 01:09 AM
Feb 2017

One of the arguments is that things regarding national security are the exclusive provenance of the Executive and are not reviewable.

From the NYT:

The ruling also rejected Mr. Trump’s claim that courts are powerless to review a president’s national security assessments. Judges have a crucial role to play in a constitutional democracy, the court said.

“It is beyond question,” the decision said, “that the federal judiciary retains the authority to adjudicate constitutional challenges to executive action.”


Note the second paragraph. It is judicial-speak for "Screw you Presi-poo. Just because you say it doesn't make it true."

Cha

(297,154 posts)
13. YAY! And, who was that Temp AG who went ahead with
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 01:31 AM
Feb 2017

the order when Sally Yates turned it down? He's going down in infamy while Sally is soaring for her honesty!

Thank you, Stonepounder..

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»National Security Federal...