National Security Federal appeals court maintains suspension of Trumps immigration order
Source: Washington Post
A federal appeals court has maintained the freeze on President Trumps controversial immigration order, meaning previously barred refugees and citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries can continue entering the U.S.
A panel with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld the ruling of U.S. District Judge James Robart, who had decided Friday that Trumps temporary travel ban should be put on hold. The Department of Homeland Security soon suspended all enforcement of Trumps controversial directive.
The Justice Department, representing the Trump administration, could now ask the Supreme Court which often defers to the president on matters of immigration and national security to intervene. The Supreme Court, though, remains one justice short, and many see it as ideologically split 4-4. A tie would keep in place whatever the appeals court decides.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-appeals-court-maintains-suspension-of-trumps-immigration-order/2017/02/09/e8526e70-ed47-11e6-9662-6eedf1627882_story.html?utm_term=.4c290f8ab7a7&tid=notifi_push_breaking-news&pushid=breaking-news_1486682050
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)Suck it Dumpf
lindysalsagal
(20,670 posts)GreydeeThos
(958 posts)We can win this one boys, time to press on with renewed effort.
Eugene
(61,872 posts)stopwastingmymoney
(2,041 posts)pdxDem
(12 posts)51% of Trump supporters according to Feb 7-8 PPP poll say they think Trump should be able to overturn decisions by judges that he disagrees with.
WTF
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)he's not a dictator. I think that he and his supporters need to brush up on their middle school civics.
This might help. https://bensguide.gpo.gov/
Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)They want an ignorant populace.
Cha
(297,154 posts)Little Tich
(6,171 posts)Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)One of the arguments is that things regarding national security are the exclusive provenance of the Executive and are not reviewable.
From the NYT:
The ruling also rejected Mr. Trumps claim that courts are powerless to review a presidents national security assessments. Judges have a crucial role to play in a constitutional democracy, the court said.
It is beyond question, the decision said, that the federal judiciary retains the authority to adjudicate constitutional challenges to executive action.
Note the second paragraph. It is judicial-speak for "Screw you Presi-poo. Just because you say it doesn't make it true."
Cha
(297,154 posts)the order when Sally Yates turned it down? He's going down in infamy while Sally is soaring for her honesty!
Thank you, Stonepounder..