Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 06:02 PM Feb 2017

Rand Paul Says It Wouldn't Be 'Useful' To Probe Flynn's Calls With Ambassador

Source: Talking Points Memo



By ESME CRIBB Published FEBRUARY 14, 2017, 4:50 PM EDT

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said Tuesday that he didn't think it would be "useful" to investigate conversations between former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and a Russian ambassador that led to Flynn's resignation.

"I think that might be excessive," Paul said in an interview with "Kilmeade and Friends" first surfaced by CNN's KFILE.

Paul said that Republicans will "never even get started" with major policy changes like repealing Obamacare if they are focused on investigating their colleagues.

"I just don't think it's useful to be doing investigation after investigation, particularly of your own party," Paul said. "I think it makes no sense." He said that President Donald Trump has apparently "handled the situation," unless there is further evidence of wrongdoing on Flynn's part.

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/rand-paul-says-not-useful-to-investigate-flynn-calls

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rand Paul Says It Wouldn't Be 'Useful' To Probe Flynn's Calls With Ambassador (Original Post) DonViejo Feb 2017 OP
lol... JHan Feb 2017 #1
But Hillary's e-mail and Benghazi Investigations itcfish Feb 2017 #16
What a coincidence! Turbineguy Feb 2017 #2
So his party is more important to him than the country. What's up when so many Republicans feel delisen Feb 2017 #3
So basicly Liberalagogo Feb 2017 #4
Too bad. Ligyron Feb 2017 #5
It's always party over country with the GOP. sinkingfeeling Feb 2017 #6
Rand my google eyed boy. NewRedDawn Feb 2017 #7
"I just don't think it's useful to be doing investigation after investigation" simguy225 Feb 2017 #8
I am sure they would have no problem whatsoever doing LisaL Feb 2017 #11
Useful to whom? More_Cowbell Feb 2017 #9
I presume to republicans. LisaL Feb 2017 #10
That's it Rand,keep it moving closer to a full blown Watergate scandal. Bengus81 Feb 2017 #12
Okey dokey, Rand. MBS Feb 2017 #13
You're Right Rand Ccarmona Feb 2017 #14
So they cobbled together a talking point BumRushDaShow Feb 2017 #15
Add "Ayn" Rand Paul to the list of those who we should investigate. lagomorph777 Feb 2017 #17
Sigh.... Bayard Feb 2017 #18
Well, fuck Rand Paul and his whole damn family dalton99a Feb 2017 #19
It would be "useful" if Republicans plan on winning a single seat next year. Fuck them. JTFrog Feb 2017 #20
Remember that Ron Paul was one of the earliest people to Blue_Tires Feb 2017 #21

JHan

(10,173 posts)
1. lol...
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 06:04 PM
Feb 2017

"I just don't think it's useful to be doing investigation after investigation, particularly of your own party,"

itcfish

(1,828 posts)
16. But Hillary's e-mail and Benghazi Investigations
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 10:42 AM
Feb 2017

were very useful to the GOP, very very useful.

delisen

(6,042 posts)
3. So his party is more important to him than the country. What's up when so many Republicans feel
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 06:11 PM
Feb 2017

the need to speak out against an investigation.

I wonder if McConnell is asking for volunteers.
 

simguy225

(80 posts)
8. "I just don't think it's useful to be doing investigation after investigation"
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 06:27 PM
Feb 2017

I know- there wasn't even any emails involved

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
11. I am sure they would have no problem whatsoever doing
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 06:37 PM
Feb 2017

investigation after investigation if it involved Hillary.

More_Cowbell

(2,190 posts)
9. Useful to whom?
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 06:30 PM
Feb 2017

Boy, they really are a bunch of petty tyrants trying to preserve their place at the top of the heap.

Bengus81

(6,931 posts)
12. That's it Rand,keep it moving closer to a full blown Watergate scandal.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 06:37 PM
Feb 2017

"And what we were elected to do we are going to do. Let others wallow in Watergate,we're going to do our job!"

Sound familiar Rand?? It should,coming from another Republican 43 years ago trying to derail an investigation.

MBS

(9,688 posts)
13. Okey dokey, Rand.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 06:42 PM
Feb 2017

Have fun twisting yourself into knots.
Republican congressmen on tonight's TV news seem to be suffering, too

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
20. It would be "useful" if Republicans plan on winning a single seat next year. Fuck them.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 12:53 PM
Feb 2017

Go down in flames you piece of shit.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
21. Remember that Ron Paul was one of the earliest people to
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 01:04 PM
Feb 2017

buy a first-class ticket on the PUTIN IS OUR NEW GLORIOUS AMERICAN GOD NOW bandwagon...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rand Paul Says It Wouldn'...