Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(48,961 posts)
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 04:35 PM Feb 2017

Trump wants to expand U.S. nuclear arsenal, make it 'top of the pack': Reuters interview

Source: Reuters

President Donald Trump said on Thursday he wants to build up the U.S. nuclear arsenal to ensure it is at the "top of the pack," saying the United States has fallen behind in its atomic weapons capacity.

-snip-

On another front, Trump said China could solve the national security challenge posed by North Korea "very easily if they want to," ratcheting up pressure on Beijing to exert more influence to rein in Pyongyang's increasingly bellicose actions.

Speaking from behind his desk in the Oval Office, Trump also declared himself "very angry" at North Korea's ballistic missile tests and said accelerating a missile defense system for U.S. allies Japan and South Korea was among many options available.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-idUSKBN1622IF?il=0

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump wants to expand U.S. nuclear arsenal, make it 'top of the pack': Reuters interview (Original Post) highplainsdem Feb 2017 OP
Does this idiot have any idea how many bombs and missile we already have?? pangaia Feb 2017 #1
Don't quote me, but it seems at one time the US had a kill rate of 50:1, enought nuclear RKP5637 Feb 2017 #7
His point is china and Russia have more. yeoman6987 Feb 2017 #18
Looks like Russia, yes.. but not by much... :)) pangaia Feb 2017 #21
There you go again yeoman6987, jumping in to defend Trump. Kingofalldems Feb 2017 #36
What was his point in contacting the FBI? Kingofalldems Feb 2017 #37
Nobody would survive use of a tenth of what we have. yardwork Feb 2017 #41
Oh, well, there we have it! True Dough Feb 2017 #2
I really would rather not read an article talking about nuclear weapons and Trump being mad Fast Walker 52 Feb 2017 #9
I can understand True Dough Feb 2017 #13
I see what you did there! VMA131Marine Feb 2017 #26
He wouldn't do it for two reasons jmowreader Feb 2017 #40
This is what happens when you elect someone with tiny hands. mn9driver Feb 2017 #3
LOL-- seriously. Fast Walker 52 Feb 2017 #10
Demented moron talking out of his ass, as usual dalton99a Feb 2017 #4
He knows more than the generals. NT mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2017 #5
what's the worst that could happen HAB911 Feb 2017 #6
what does he want to do? Does he even know? Fast Walker 52 Feb 2017 #8
he wants this Angry Dragon Feb 2017 #25
gee, I feel so much better now... Fast Walker 52 Feb 2017 #31
This is how the resident of the UNited States spoke about China influencing N Korea.. BadGimp Feb 2017 #11
Why? How many times over do we need to be able to destroy the planet? Isn't once enough? NurseJackie Feb 2017 #12
Exactly nt avebury Feb 2017 #27
When he's through... yallerdawg Feb 2017 #14
The man is insane. Botany Feb 2017 #15
Actually, we have 18, not 32. but 18 gets the job done. Ray Bruns Feb 2017 #23
I read that we have 18 Ohio class subs and 14 trident class subs ..... Botany Feb 2017 #32
What we need to do is to dismantle the majority of the weapons we have, take any weapons grade... NNadir Feb 2017 #16
Let me guess - Fox News told him what to think on this issue? Initech Feb 2017 #17
Hair Furor! lark Feb 2017 #19
yep... draining the swamp, or something... Blue_Tires Feb 2017 #20
I swear, the Republican view of the world is frozen in the late 70s... JHB Feb 2017 #22
We have plenty of warheads, the only thing needing replaced are the old Minutman III icbms. Ray Bruns Feb 2017 #24
This man breathes, injects, spouts bullshit 24/7 JHan Feb 2017 #28
This is all about pay back to the Wellstone ruled Feb 2017 #29
And does he actually think that he and his grifter family avebury Feb 2017 #30
He didn't even know what the START Treaty until last week. This monster needs to be stoped. RAFisher Feb 2017 #33
More and bigger is always better, right? moondust Feb 2017 #34
Stupid ignorant imbecile wants to ignite a nuclear arms race. Reagan spins in his grave. Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2017 #35
Hey, if you're going to blow up the world, you want to do a GREAT job. neeksgeek Feb 2017 #38
Nothing more Flatpicker Feb 2017 #39

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
1. Does this idiot have any idea how many bombs and missile we already have??
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 04:39 PM
Feb 2017


I mean, HOW MANY does one need to destroy life on the planet?

RKP5637

(67,102 posts)
7. Don't quote me, but it seems at one time the US had a kill rate of 50:1, enought nuclear
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 05:01 PM
Feb 2017

file power to kill every living being on the planet earth 50 times. I guess that's not enough for president asshole.

yardwork

(61,588 posts)
41. Nobody would survive use of a tenth of what we have.
Fri Feb 24, 2017, 07:06 AM
Feb 2017

Nuclear weapons aren't like bullets. It only takes a few to wipe out the planet. We all have more than enough.

True Dough

(17,301 posts)
2. Oh, well, there we have it!
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 04:40 PM
Feb 2017

Donny Trump is "very angry." That should certainly make Kim Jong Un think twice before launching another nuclear-capable missile.

Remember during the campaign when Drumpf said he would talk to Kim? Why doesn't he fly the North Korean leader over the Mar-a-Lago for some golf this weekend?

jmowreader

(50,552 posts)
40. He wouldn't do it for two reasons
Fri Feb 24, 2017, 01:59 AM
Feb 2017

Trump hates Kim's guts, and KJU doesn't play golf. That was his father.

Oh, and I found out the truth of Kim Jong Il's infamous round of golf, in which he hit five holes-in-one on his very first round...http://www.golf.com/golf-plus/behind-kim-jong-ils-famous-round-golf

Turns out that KJI's caddy was scoring him "relative to par." Par, as most Americans know, is the number of strokes a good golfer should need to play the hole. The way almost everyone marks their scorecards is by writing down the number of times he or she hits the ball to put it in the cup. KJI's caddy was writing down the number of shots OVER PAR Dear Leader was hitting - if they were on a par-3 hole and Kim made 4 shots, his caddy wrote down a 1. At the end of the round, Kim was 38 strokes over par...which is about average for someone's first time on a golf course. When he got the card back to the clubhouse, the pro there didn't know Kim had shot 38 over par, and thought he just shot 38. So sorry.

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
31. gee, I feel so much better now...
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 06:54 PM
Feb 2017



It was really weird when at one debate they asked him about global warming and he said the real warming we should worry about is from nukes. Like WTF.

BadGimp

(4,013 posts)
11. This is how the resident of the UNited States spoke about China influencing N Korea..
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 05:07 PM
Feb 2017

Trump said China could solve the national security challenge posed by North Korea "very easily if they want to,"

Very presidential indeed.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
14. When he's through...
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 05:20 PM
Feb 2017

we'll have "the biggest, most beautiful nuclear arsenal in the world!"

Which means he just needs to add gold curtains in the silos!

Botany

(70,484 posts)
15. The man is insane.
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 05:20 PM
Feb 2017

We have 32 nuclear missile subs in the USN and each sub has up to 24 missiles
and each missile can have up to 12 H bombs with a range of > 5,000 miles.

So the math is 32 x 24 = 768 missile that can have up 12 warheads

768 x 12 = 9,216 H bombs. One H bomb around St. Louis would make
millions of acres of cropland unuseable for God only knows how long.

For God's sake we need to get that man out of the White House before it is
too late. He spends too much time talking and thinking about nuclear war.

2/16/17 "We're a very powerful nuclear country and so are they," Mr Trump said. "I've been briefed.
And I can tell you one thing about a briefing that we're allowed to say, because anybody that ever
read the most basic book can say it, nuclear holocaust would be like no other." D. Trump


Every President from Nixon on have worked at reducing the # of nuclear weapons
world wide because they are really expensive and we can never ever use them
because it would end life on this planet.

Ray Bruns

(4,093 posts)
23. Actually, we have 18, not 32. but 18 gets the job done.
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 06:25 PM
Feb 2017

18 subs, but not all can be at sea at the same time.
Figure 4 boats on patrol at any one time. 4X24X8 = 768 475kT warheads.
They are already planning a replacement sub.

Botany

(70,484 posts)
32. I read that we have 18 Ohio class subs and 14 trident class subs .....
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 07:13 PM
Feb 2017

..... and that is where I came up w/the # 32.

This does not count land based missiles, or weapons on aircraft.

Still you are right about 478 H bombs being more than enough that the
living would envy the dead.

I read some place that we have a little less then 7,000 nuclear warheads
and Russia has about the same # too. But once you set off more than
20 or 30 it is game over.

NNadir

(33,512 posts)
16. What we need to do is to dismantle the majority of the weapons we have, take any weapons grade...
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 05:23 PM
Feb 2017

...plutonium we have from this process and put it into reactors to denature it while breeding new lower grade plutonium..

As it happens, this plutonium could very well be utilized to seriously address climate change. The world inventory of plutonium (including reactor grade) is sufficient to provide about 174 exajoules of energy per year, about 1/3 of the energy humanity consumes each year.

In some ways, this plutonium is the last best hope of the human race, but only if it's used by wise people. The opposite is true if it is used by fools.

The United States by the way, no longer has the capability to produce weapons grade plutonium, which is, of course, a good thing, given that a fool occupies the White House.

lark

(23,090 posts)
19. Hair Furor!
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 05:27 PM
Feb 2017

A calamity a minute. He's so freaking greedy, he really wants to push nukes because he has zero clue about the world ending threat they are. To his little pea-brain, he just wants the biggest and best toys and wants to use them whenever he feels like it. We are so fucked!

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
20. yep... draining the swamp, or something...
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 05:29 PM
Feb 2017

But Hillary was the REAL war candidate, or so people told me...

JHB

(37,158 posts)
22. I swear, the Republican view of the world is frozen in the late 70s...
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 05:36 PM
Feb 2017

...except for the "get their marching orders straight from the Kremlin" business. They had to switch to Soros because they took up the Kremlin gig.

Ray Bruns

(4,093 posts)
24. We have plenty of warheads, the only thing needing replaced are the old Minutman III icbms.
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 06:34 PM
Feb 2017

We have over 4000 warheads in our stockpile, about 1900 deployed ready for use. Seems enough to do the job.

Spending money just so you can have more warheads than the other guy is a waste of money. But that has never stopped drumpf before (See 25 billion dollar wall on the border with Mexico).

As I said, the only thing needing replacement our Minuteman III icbms. They were built in the 70's and are entering the end of their life span.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
29. This is all about pay back to the
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 06:49 PM
Feb 2017

Uranium interests including the Russian Interests. We have been hearing stories about Nuke Testing and it's resumption .

avebury

(10,952 posts)
30. And does he actually think that he and his grifter family
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 06:50 PM
Feb 2017

could actually survive a nuclear holocaust? Well that is one way to get him out of office. Unfortunately it would destroy the entire country (as well as the planet) in the process.

RAFisher

(466 posts)
33. He didn't even know what the START Treaty until last week. This monster needs to be stoped.
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 07:45 PM
Feb 2017

He's going to kill alot of people.

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)
35. Stupid ignorant imbecile wants to ignite a nuclear arms race. Reagan spins in his grave.
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 08:07 PM
Feb 2017

Trump conservative? Hah! Reckless, spendy, dangerous.

neeksgeek

(1,214 posts)
38. Hey, if you're going to blow up the world, you want to do a GREAT job.
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 10:50 PM
Feb 2017


Edited to add: Maybe this is their plan. Blow up all the poor people while the 1% hunker down in their bunkers waiting for the radioactive fallout to fade. Then they'll come out and #profit!





Flatpicker

(894 posts)
39. Nothing more
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 11:21 PM
Feb 2017

Than old men with outdated ideas looking to fight the last war over again.

What a waste of resources.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump wants to expand U.S...