Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Fri Feb 24, 2017, 07:32 PM Feb 2017

Coal, oil and gas companies to pay less in royalties after Interior decision

Source: Washington Post

The Interior Department informed coal, oil and gas companies this week they do not need to comply with a new federal accounting system that would have compelled them to pay millions of dollars in additional royalties.

The Office of Natural Resources Revenue’s new method of calculating royalties for minerals extracted on federal land — which was finalized last July and took effect Jan. 1 — was aimed at preventing firms from underpaying what they owe by selling coal to subsidiaries at an artificially low price. But energy firms, some of whom challenged the new rule in court, called the requirements confusing, complicated and onerous and pressed for a delay.

“This rule would have had immediate detrimental effects to American energy producers and the hard-working Montanans and workers across the country they support,” said Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who asked the administration last month to stay the rule.

Companies were set to file their first reports under the new rule Tuesday.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/coal-oil-and-gas-companies-to-pay-less-in-royalties-after-interior-decision/2017/02/24/a3164016-fad5-11e6-bf01-d47f8cf9b643_story.html?utm_term=.69c52be5f471



Less money for Us, more money for them. The Trump Way.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BumRushDaShow

(128,452 posts)
4. Watch them try to do the same for royalties paid for extraction from private land
Fri Feb 24, 2017, 08:07 PM
Feb 2017

as an attempt to reduce the payouts to the Drumpf supporters that get them.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
5. Of course. Destruction of government by defunding it.
Fri Feb 24, 2017, 08:19 PM
Feb 2017

Crony capitalism by both cutting business taxes and funneling worker taxes to business.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
6. that's OUR public land and OUR minerals and OUR Federal government, Republicans allow Corps to screw
Fri Feb 24, 2017, 08:24 PM
Feb 2017

the American people.

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
8. Same corps who cause worst deterioration of roads get free pass
Fri Feb 24, 2017, 11:14 PM
Feb 2017

Just how does SCROTUS plan to pay f/ infrastructure upgrades? Miniscule amounts saved by defending NEA, CPB, PP, etc won't begin to cover loss of drill & mine leases.

Esp disgusting when one considers that fracking, f/ instance, destroys county & state roads & already avoids paying f/ upkeep/repairs.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
10. It's the good old "privatize profits, socialize costs" model ...
Sat Feb 25, 2017, 09:52 PM
Feb 2017

IOW, the favored model used by scumbag corps all over the world.

Funny how it's only the evil 'socialism' ... when the 'profits' are the matter in question.

But all of us collectively being soaked for the SOCIALIZED costs, otoh? Why that's just 'good business', isn't it?

Not 'socialism' at all ...

Fukcers ... including all who are dumb enough to 'support' this 'model' of supposed 'capitalism'.

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
11. It misses point that ifrastructure is tied to security
Sun Feb 26, 2017, 12:56 PM
Feb 2017

After all, Eisenhower wanted the Interstate system set up more f/ security than as a public convenience.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Coal, oil and gas compani...