Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,508 posts)
Sat Feb 25, 2017, 11:41 PM Feb 2017

Judge decides against fining widow who called police 'pigs'

Source: Associated Press


Updated 4:45 pm, Saturday, February 25, 2017



MOORE, Okla. (AP) A federal judge has dismissed a request to impose a stiff fine against a widow who called police "pigs" on Facebook as she vented her frustrations over the death of her husband in a scuffle.

U.S. District Court Judge Timothy DeGiusti declined to sanction Nair Rodriguez for the 18-minute Facebook Live video she made in December, pleading for justice for her husband, Luis Rodriguez.

Nair Rodriguez is suing the city of Moore, its police department and the theater in whose parking lot her husband died after officers intervened in a family argument. She claims authorities violated her husband's civil rights by using excessive force during the altercation in the Oklahoma City suburb.

The defendants asked the judge to sanction Rodriguez for disrupting the case by live-streaming her frustrations from outside a room where an officer was being deposed. They accused her of inciting violence against police with the "pigs" label, and sought a penalty of about $4,000 to recoup legal fees and other expenses.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Judge-sides-with-widow-accused-of-inciting-10959057.php

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge decides against fining widow who called police 'pigs' (Original Post) Judi Lynn Feb 2017 OP
that's nothing compared to what the police call us nt msongs Feb 2017 #1
Sanctions against a person being able to express their opinions? Thor_MN Feb 2017 #2
When government actors try to restrict speech there needs to be consequences on their part. LiberalFighter Feb 2017 #3
she was just telling the truth gopiscrap Feb 2017 #4
Hope it was a no-case-here decision for this federal judge. Hortensis Feb 2017 #5
 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
2. Sanctions against a person being able to express their opinions?
Sun Feb 26, 2017, 09:40 AM
Feb 2017

*45 and the GOP haven't repealed the 1st amendment, yet.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
5. Hope it was a no-case-here decision for this federal judge.
Mon Feb 27, 2017, 08:18 AM
Feb 2017

But in this era of modern communications, at what point do we consider such exercise of free speech a potential threat to achieving justice? Only when a trial starts? Not even then? Before a jury is chosen?

Professionals could influence an entire community's potential jurors, such as those hired by above-the-law plutocrats whenever anyone tries to bring them to justice. What's the law on this? Somehow I doubt it's caught up to new realities.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge decides against fin...