Trump personally met with Russian ambassador during campaign
Source: Think Progress
Donald Trump has claimed repeatedly that he has had no contact with Russian officials as a presidential candidate.
He was lying.
Trump personally met with the Russian ambassador on April 27, 2016, prior to a major foreign policy speech. The Wall Street Journal, in a report that was little-noticed at the time but was recently picked up by AMERICABlog News, reported the meeting last year.
A few minutes before he made those remarks, Mr. Trump met at a VIP reception with Russias ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Ivanovich Kislyak. Mr. Trump warmly greeted Mr. Kislyak and three other foreign ambassadors who came to the reception.
Kislyak, according to multiple contemporaneous news reports, was seated in the front row. It was an invitation-only event.
Read more: https://thinkprogress.org/trump-personally-met-with-russian-ambassador-during-campaign-cc59ae305032#.80c6aqxav
photo at the link
Who is seated next to him? Why, is that James Baker?
edited to add:
Gen. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III was also in attendance. Will he have to amend his statement to Congress all over again?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/03/07/1641090/-Donald-Trump-met-and-warmly-greeted-the-Russian-ambassador-during-the-campaign
Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,153 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)At the Superbowl. Poppy Bush was also somewhere around, but Pence and Baker spent a lot of time together.
I think so-called establishment republicans take their concerns to Pence and bypass Trump.
Of course Trump lied.
PatSeg
(47,260 posts)that could have been a perfectly innocent meeting, but Trump lied about it. It is probably going to be all his damn lies that will bring him down more than what he was actually doing. Once again, it is the cover up, not the crime.
Trump is such a prolific liar, he undoubtedly does not know what he has said or done in the past.
riversedge
(70,084 posts)about his lies. There does not seem to be a tipping point--or Enough is Enough for these folks.
PatSeg
(47,260 posts)It would seem that Trump really cannot do anything to turn off his hard core base. He was right when he said he could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and not lose a single voter. Even he was amazed.
mahina
(17,616 posts)but Chris didn't call them what they were. Lies!
Come on, man!
riversedge
(70,084 posts)TeamPooka
(24,207 posts)dalton99a
(81,392 posts)C_U_L8R
(44,987 posts)it was three lies and you're out !!
rockfordfile
(8,695 posts)Kablooie
(18,610 posts)He will want to change everyone's attention.
Saboburns
(2,807 posts)Trump will besmirch the CIA. Even moreso than he already has.
And it will be soon i think .
angrychair
(8,678 posts)So it says
Who were the other three ambassadors?
If I were to guess I would say Qutar, Azerbaijan and China. All countries he has significant financial interests in.
I say it a little tongue in cheek but I ask the question seriously as a private meeting with 4 specific ambassadors is as exclusive an audience as you get.
Igel
(35,274 posts)The article only justifies "met", not "met with".
I met Shimon Perez. I didn't meet with him. It was at a reception. We spoke, presumably "warmly," for a few minutes.
If we played "telephone," after that was transmitted a few times I'd be alleged to be in deep intrigue with Perez. In spite of the fact that all I said was I was in a Slavic graduate program and, in response to, "Mowisz po-polsku" I shook my head and said, "Nie ... Ale mluvim cesky, rusky, a srpsky." He understood the Czech, and we stayed in English for the next couple of minutes.
What we have here is eisegesis. It's like exegesis, where you dig meaning out of a speaker's words, but in reverse--you furiously shove crap into them to make them mean what you need them to mean.
ColemanMaskell
(783 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)You seem to infer 'met' as a verb has merely one, rather than seven different meanings dependent on context. Textual criticism is not eisegesis... they are two wholly different concepts.
red dog 1
(27,771 posts)Another falsehood by the Liar-in-Chief
Imagine how the Repubs would have reacted to Obama lying about something this important?
gerryatwork
(64 posts)Just added Liar-in-Chief to the Urban Dictionary. Which they should approve. I've already added Trumpocalypse, Trumped, Fake President, and Russiagate
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)ColemanMaskell
(783 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)Behind the Aegis
(53,921 posts)Trump fails to impress foreign-policy experts
A speech aimed at boosting his credibility got low marks from across the spectrum.
By Michael Crowley
| 04/27/16 05:58 PM EDT
In his address to an elite, invitation-only Washington foreign policy audience Wednesday, Donald Trump promised that, as president, he would restore a coherent vision to Americas role in the world.
...
One notable figure sitting in the front row as Trump repeated his call for better relations with Moscow I believe an easing of tensions and improved relations with Russia, from a position of strength, is possible. Common sense says this cycle of hostility must end, Trump said was Russias ambassador to Washington, Sergey Kislyak. (Trump made some intriguing points, but we need to understand what is meant in the implementation, Kislyak told POLITICO after the speech. It needs to be started carefully.)
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/donald-trump-foreign-policy-speech-reaction-222544
[hr]
Still can't find who the other three ambassadors were.
ColemanMaskell
(783 posts)On Wednesday, April 27, the Center for the National Interests magazine The National Interest hosted leading Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump for a foreign policy speech as a part of its continuing coverage of the 2016 electoral campaign. Zalmay Khalilzad, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Afghanistan and Iraq, introduced Mr. Trump. Ambassador Khalilzad is also one of the members of The National Interest advisory council and the Centers board of directors. Center Chairman General Charles Boyd, board members Drew Guff, Grover Norquist and President Dimitri Simes also took part. Other participants included Senator Jeff Sessions, several Members of the House of Representatives and the ambassadors of Italy, the Philippines, Russia and Singapore.
http://americablog.com/2017/03/newsmax-trump-met-russian-amb-kislyak-last-april-despite-denials.html
Behind the Aegis
(53,921 posts)I wonder if it was the Italian ambassador who said; "He (the current "president" is like Berlusconi with nukes." I read that unsourced quote in another article.
ColemanMaskell
(783 posts)ColemanMaskell
(783 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,007 posts)Marcuse
(7,446 posts)dchill
(38,442 posts)C_U_L8R
(44,987 posts)This liar needs to go. Congress, do your job!
UCmeNdc
(9,600 posts)There is more to this story.
March 4th
(80 posts)Kislyak = Kiss His Ass, apparently.
kimbutgar
(21,055 posts)Now we have a scrotus who encouraged, and was all right with Russia influencing our election and installing their puppet. Cheeto is a Russian asset now,