Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,378 posts)
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 10:17 AM Mar 2017

New York Architects Plan Enormous Skyscraper Hanging From An Asteroid In Space

Source: Forbes

Mar 29, 2017 @ 06:36 AM New York Architects Plan Enormous Skyscraper Hanging From An Asteroid In Space

Brid-Aine Parnell, Contributor

I write about science, technology and the wonders of the universe

The quest to cram ever more human beings into ever-decreasing square footage of city real estate continues with a skyscraper suspended from an asteroid.

A New York architecture firm is proposing a design for the worlds tallest building Analemma Tower, which would hang down from the sky suspended by air cables attached to an asteroid.

Analemma inverts the traditional diagram of an earth-based foundation, instead depending on a space-based supporting foundation from which the tower is suspended. This system is referred to as the Universal Orbital Support System (UOSS), Clouds Architecture Office said in a statement.*

By placing a large asteroid into orbit over earth, a high strength cable can be lowered towards the surface of earth from which a super tall tower can be suspended. Since this new tower typology is suspended in the air, it can be constructed anywhere in the world and transported to its final location. ... This portability would allow the company to construct the tower in the sky over Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, which the company says has proven to be a specialist in tall building construction at one fifth the cost of New York City construction. Clouds Architecture Office then plans to move the finished tower to New York.

* http://www.cloudsao.com/ANALEMMA-TOWER

Read more: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bridaineparnell/2017/03/29/skyscraper_suspended_on_asteroid/



https://twitter.com/bridainep
@bridainep

New York Architects Plan Enormous Skyscraper Hanging From An Asteroid In Space... http://bit.ly/2nLlXqe via @SciForbes



No, it is not April 1 yet.

Hats off to Bruce McCall if he's jumping the gun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_McCall



* * * * * * *

http://www.cloudsao.com/ANALEMMA-TOWER

Analemma inverts the traditional diagram of an earth-based foundation, instead depending on a space-based supporting foundation from which the tower is suspended. This system is referred to as the Universal Orbital Support System (UOSS). By placing a large asteroid into orbit over earth, a high strength cable can be lowered towards the surface of earth from which a super tall tower can be suspended. Since this new tower typology is suspended in the air, it can be constructed anywhere in the world and transported to its final location. The proposal calls for Analemma to be constructed over Dubai, which has proven to be a specialist in tall building construction at one fifth the cost of New York City construction.
....



....
Analemma can be placed in an eccentric geosynchronous orbit which would allow it to travel between the northern and southern hemispheres on a daily loop. The ground trace for this pendulum tower would be a figure eight, where the tower would move at its slowest speed at the top and bottom of the figure eight allowing the possibility for the towers occupants to interface with the planets surface at these points. The proposed orbit is calibrated so the slowest part of the towers trajectory occurs over New York City.
....


17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New York Architects Plan Enormous Skyscraper Hanging From An Asteroid In Space (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2017 OP
I've seen that movie Renew Deal Mar 2017 #1
or that episode BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #12
I suppose the sewage just drops out of the bottom jberryhill Mar 2017 #2
That's part of the plan. Trump decides what part of the US COLGATE4 Mar 2017 #4
True Trickle Down packman Mar 2017 #7
It's nuts. A space elevator would make much more sense and would be more feasible. Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2017 #3
in addition... HuskyOffset Mar 2017 #5
Yeah, the shear involved in a structure that is both in LEO and the lower atmosphere is terrifying. cemaphonic Mar 2017 #9
Yah, sure packman Mar 2017 #6
"Why not just build the damn thing ON the asteroid?" mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2017 #8
You know what really burns my ass? FrodosNewPet Mar 2017 #16
no doubt a Russian money laundering scheme - we can send all wordpix Mar 2017 #10
What could possibly go wrong? meadowlander Mar 2017 #11
...SO WE'RE GOING TO BUILD THIS SKY TOWER AND MAKE DUBAI PAY FOR IT Blue_Tires Mar 2017 #13
helicopter plus a long cable equals a lot of fun snooper2 Mar 2017 #14
No. Just . . . no. nt tblue37 Mar 2017 #15
If the asteroid's orbit is eccentric (and it has to be to spend more time above the Northern muriel_volestrangler Mar 2017 #17

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
4. That's part of the plan. Trump decides what part of the US
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 10:54 AM
Mar 2017

has him pissed off at the moment and - voila, we move the SKYscraper over it until they see the light. Then, off to the next 'sanctuary' city...

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)
3. It's nuts. A space elevator would make much more sense and would be more feasible.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 10:26 AM
Mar 2017

A space elevator would be in one place. This monstrosity would be a roving navigation nightmare and a menace to the ground it passes over. Stresses would age the cabling a hundred times faster than a space elevator.

HuskyOffset

(888 posts)
5. in addition...
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:01 AM
Mar 2017

...the problem we have building a space elevator today is that no currently known material is strong enough. I think theoretical carbon nanotubes would be strong enough, but we cannot manufacture them at the scale needed (if I'm remembering correctly.) So, good luck with that skyscraper (or should it be called an earthscraper?)

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
9. Yeah, the shear involved in a structure that is both in LEO and the lower atmosphere is terrifying.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 12:03 PM
Mar 2017

Not to mention, safely shepherding a large asteroid into Earth orbit is not exactly a trivial problem.

Fun thought exercise, but this is self-promotion, not a serious proposal.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
6. Yah, sure
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:28 AM
Mar 2017

I'm still waiting for the air-car and personal jet packs




I ponder and think - Why not just build the damn thing ON the asteroid?

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,378 posts)
8. "Why not just build the damn thing ON the asteroid?"
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:37 AM
Mar 2017

Last edited Wed Mar 29, 2017, 03:20 PM - Edit history (1)

Then there would be no clear way to levy real estate taxes.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
10. no doubt a Russian money laundering scheme - we can send all
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 12:12 PM
Mar 2017

Russia-linked ppl there once it's built, by that time the sentences will be done.

meadowlander

(4,394 posts)
11. What could possibly go wrong?
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 01:40 PM
Mar 2017

I'm sure air traffic control in the 13 countries this thing will be flying over will absolutely love this idea.

Also, how are you meant to get on and off so that you can go to work/school/shopping/visiting anyone who doesn't live in the same tower?

And you'd have to have massive water supply and wastewater tanks and fly up to resupply/drain them constantly. And solar arrays the size of a state to provide electricity.

This would be a cool idea for colonising a gas planet though. Except basically you need to just build a space station that's self-contained.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
17. If the asteroid's orbit is eccentric (and it has to be to spend more time above the Northern
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 03:00 PM
Mar 2017

Hemisphere), then it varies considerably in distance from the centre of the earth - and thus the surface (plus, of course, there's the equatorial bulge which doesn't seem to feature in their diagram). I'm not convinced their calculations are right.

Plus, it looks from the diagram that the highest speed over the ground is perhaps 1200 km/h - possibly supersonic at altitude. The forces on something dangling in the atmosphere at that speed will be immense.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New York Architects Plan ...