Tim Kaine: Decides to oppose Gorsuch nomination.
Source: Tim Kaine official twitter page.
Senator Tim Kaine Verified account
After meeting with Judge Gorsuch & studying his past decisions, I've decided to oppose his nomination. Full statement:
Read more:
Link to tweet
Aristus
(66,316 posts)JudyM
(29,233 posts)Thanks to everyone who contacted his office! Now what about Warner?!
202-224-3121
(On edit: Just called his office to thank him for opposing Gorsuch and urge him to stay strong even if McConnell heats things up.)
Aristus
(66,316 posts)rogue emissary
(3,148 posts)Duppers
(28,120 posts)We must keep the pressure on.
JudyM
(29,233 posts)Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)Do we have a list of who still needs a little encouragement to oppose the nomination?
rogue emissary
(3,148 posts)Kaine (D-VA), Bennet (CO), Manchin (WV), Leahy won't block Gorsuch: please call them!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028861347
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)"As of now I do not believe I can support Judge Gorsuch, Leahy tweeted on March 27. He did not answer basic Qs & was selected by extreme interest groups w an agenda.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/325515-the-hills-whip-list-where-dems-stand-on-trumps-supreme-court-nominee
niyad
(113,259 posts)Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)Dems regarding Gorsuch
Yes (0)
No (32)
undecided (7)
-Bennet (Colo)
-Donnelly (Ind)
-Heitkamp (N.D.)
-King (I-Maine)
-Manchin (W. Va)
-McCaskill (Mass.)
-Tester (Mont.)
The full list of names is provided within the link.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)I will check again.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)They only have 39 senators listed and there are 48 in the Democratic caucus.
Maybe they are still working on the list and have not yet finalized it.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)calimary
(81,220 posts)Handy TOLL FREE Capitol Hill switchboard numbers in my sig lines for your convenience.
BTW - if you're not a constituent - BUT YOU CONTRIBUTED TO HIS/HER CAMPAIGN, then GO FOR IT!!!!
I called Heidi Heitkamp's office back after Newtown when she went on Good Morning America and insisted she would not do squat about the easy access to assault weapons. While I've never even been near either one of the Dakotas, I politely reminded her staffer that - yeah, I'm not a constituent, I'm from California. But when she ran for office, she was VERY happy to take MY CALIFORNIA MONEY for her campaign. So she certainly can, should, and WILL hear from me NOW.
Also - if you have ANY dealings in their state or their district, then GO FOR IT!
Got relatives there? Then you've probably physically been there, visiting.
Got business ties or dealings there? Then you're invested in that area.
Went to school there?
Used to live there before you moved?
Used to work there before you moved for a new job or got transferred?
Grew up there?
Then GO FOR IT!
JudyM
(29,233 posts)FBaggins
(26,727 posts)That's less than clear
StatGirl
(518 posts). . . as we've seen before.
dalton99a
(81,451 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Bill Nelson has said he would filly buster Nonesuch..
(Of course he is being primaried, so there is that)
Others should join him...