Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
Mon May 8, 2017, 11:24 PM May 2017

Trump Administration Cites Segregation-Era Ruling To Defend Its Travel Ban

Source: MSN/Huffington Post

WASHINGTON ― In a brief defending its ban on citizens from six Muslim-majority countries, President Donald Trump’s Justice Department approvingly cited a segregation-era Supreme Court decision that allowed Jackson, Mississippi, to close public pools rather than integrate them.

In the early 1960s, courts ordered Jackson to desegregate its public parks, which included five swimming pools. Instead, the city decided to close the pools. Black residents of Jackson sued. But in 1971, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, decided that closing the pools rather than integrating them was just fine.

The dissents, even at the time, were furious. “May a State in order to avoid integration of the races abolish all of its public schools?” Justice William O. Douglas asked in his dissent .

“I had thought official policies forbidding or discouraging joint use of public facilities by Negroes and whites were at war with the Equal Protection Clause” of the Fourteenth Amendment, Justice Byron White wrote in another dissent. “Our cases make it unquestionably clear, as all of us agree, that a city or State may not enforce such a policy by maintaining officially separate facilities for the two races. It is also my view, but apparently not that of the majority, that a State may not have an official stance against desegregating public facilities and implement it by closing those facilities in response to a desegregation order.”


Read more: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-administration-cites-segregation-era-ruling-to-defend-its-travel-ban/ar-BBATvQM?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UE01DHP



Wow. The U.S. Government relying on pro-segregation case law? The racists have are truly trying to bring us back.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ck4829

(35,042 posts)
1. Be sure to read the paragraph at the end - Racists, the real snowflakes
Mon May 8, 2017, 11:31 PM
May 2017

“The practice of bathing had expanded to include swimming for exercise, but water retained the longstanding symbolic link with purity,” Gutman wrote. “Swimming pools became places where those seen as impure or polluted would be excluded (even though water had to be sanitized in order to be pure). When pressed to integrate, white operators protested pools would have to be emptied, scrubbed clean and refilled with fresh water after black children swam in them.”

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-administration-cites-segregation-era-ruling-to-defend-its-travel-ban/ar-BBATvQM?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UE01DHP

So they were OK with black people handling their food and cleaning their homes, but not being in the same sanitized pool as them? That... makes sense. Not.

cstanleytech

(26,280 posts)
2. If the government had ordered all airports to shut down for good that argument might work
Mon May 8, 2017, 11:57 PM
May 2017

but they deliberately singled out specific areas due to peoples religion because thats what Trump vowed to do and then he did it.

benld74

(9,904 posts)
3. Honestly, I was waiting and read more
Tue May 9, 2017, 12:00 AM
May 2017

Then I was expecting and read more then I was hoping to read either Borowitz's name or The Onion.
But alas no such luck
Remembering who Dept Justice is headed
This case reference does NOT surprise in the least.
I just sadly shake my head and pray for this country.

cstanleytech

(26,280 posts)
4. Agreed. In fact if things continue on this course I wouldnt be surprised if Trump and his
Tue May 9, 2017, 12:12 AM
May 2017

administration claim they can now sell people who are in prison as slaves claiming that the thirteenth amendment allows them to sell them as part of their punishment for committing a crime.

tblue37

(65,290 posts)
7. Actually, prisoners ARE rented out as slave labor. And of course minorities are disproportionately
Tue May 9, 2017, 12:28 AM
May 2017

imprisoned in the US.

cstanleytech

(26,280 posts)
8. Yes but I mean that they try to go literally back to where they sell them
Tue May 9, 2017, 12:37 AM
May 2017

on the auction block and the new owners can treat them however they wish and not pay them anything at all.
Right now atleast they earn something and at least have some legal protections while serving their time which is surely better than having zero protections as a slave.

spiderpig

(10,419 posts)
9. The hits just keep coming, don't they?
Tue May 9, 2017, 12:38 AM
May 2017

As Rachel Maddow said tonight, "108 days and already we are at this level of coverup and scandal."

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
10. How Does That Apply Here?
Tue May 9, 2017, 01:10 AM
May 2017

Seriously. Here the ruling was that Jackson could close all of its pools. To apply now Trump would have to be banning immigration from all nations and not just Muslim's from 7 Muslim majority nations. Maybe Dred-Scott will be cited next.

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
12. Fits this Administration perfectly - they probably saw nothing wrong with it.
Tue May 9, 2017, 01:17 AM
May 2017
“May a State in order to avoid integration of the races abolish all of its public schools?”


- Have you seen the Trump Administrations plans for public schools?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Administration Cite...