BUSTED: Trumps expected pick for top USDA scientist is not a scientist
Source: ProPublica
PRO PUBLICA
12 MAY 2017 AT 21:03 ET
The USDAs research section studies everything from climate change to nutrition. Under the 2008 Farm Bill, its leader is supposed to serve as the agencys chief scientist and be chosen from among distinguished scientists with specialized or significant experience in agricultural research, education, and economics.
But Sam Clovis who, according to sources with knowledge of the appointment and members of the agriculture trade press, is President Trumps pick to oversee the section -- appears to have no such credentials.
Clovis has never taken a graduate course in science and is openly skeptical of climate change. While he has a doctorate in public administration and was a tenured professor of business and public policy at Morningside College for 10 years, he has published almost no academic work.
Clovis is better known for hosting a conservative talk radio show in his native Iowa and, after mounting an unsuccessful run for Senate in 2014, becoming a fiery pro-Trump advocate on television.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2017/05/busted-trumps-expected-pick-for-top-usda-scientist-is-not-a-scientist/
dhol82
(9,352 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Nothing new here. Time to give up eating any USDA inspected meat. As the crazy drumpf world churns.
CurtEastPoint
(18,638 posts)Two little (snort) peas in a pod.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)they love them some business people without a clue about science.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)types who all think the same and do Trump's bidding. They are not being hired to do those jobs at all. It's a farce.
CousinIT
(9,238 posts)Greeaaaaat.
RandomAccess
(5,210 posts)And now we should be using it about every day.
Rhiannon12866
(205,114 posts)But that's exactly what this is, not only the least qualified, but those who oppose the very departments they're supposed to be leading/advocating for. Great contribution and welcome to DU! It's great to have you with us!
BumRushDaShow
(128,748 posts)The word was coined by Stanford University professor Robert N. Proctor, who described it as culturally constructed ignorance, created by special interest groups to create confusion and suppress the truth in a societally important issue. It is especially useful to sow seeds of doubt in complex scientific issues by publicizing inaccurate or misleading data.
<...>
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-06-27/culturally-constructed-ignorance-wins-the-day
Joe Madison has periodically emphasized this phenomena under the current administration and even Krugman provided examples of its use by the GOP 6 years ago.
The suite of unqualified nominees are purposely chosen to manufacture, nurture, and maintain ignorance.
And welcome to DU!