Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu May 18, 2017, 02:44 PM May 2017

Democratic attorneys general seek to intervene in Obamacare case

Source: Reuters



Thu May 18, 2017 | 2:18pm EDT

By Dan Levine, Lawrence Hurley and Yasmeen Abutaleb | SAN FRANCISCO/WASHINGTON
More than a dozen Democratic attorneys general on Thursday sought to intervene to defend a key part of the Obamacare healthcare law -- subsidy payments to insurance companies -- which is under threat in a court case.

The 16 attorneys general, led by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, filed a motion to intervene in the case pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

The case, which dates back to the Obama administration, was filed by the Republican-led House of Representatives against the federal government in an effort to cut off subsidy payments to insurers for the individual plans created by the Affordable Care Act, often called Obamacare.

The subsidies payments help cover out-of-pocket medical expenses for low-income Americans.


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-healthcare-lawsuits-idUSKCN18E2OH

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democratic attorneys general seek to intervene in Obamacare case (Original Post) DonViejo May 2017 OP
Damn, I though that thing was settled in our favor already. Ligyron May 2017 #1
It was temporarily put on hold, hence no immediate threat to the payments. Jim Lane May 2017 #2
A side point- But I think we should keep calling it Obamacare. Trumpcare frightens, and mpcamb May 2017 #3
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
2. It was temporarily put on hold, hence no immediate threat to the payments.
Thu May 18, 2017, 03:20 PM
May 2017

After the November election, there was the obvious possibility that the incoming administration wouldn't want to continue the payments, in which event the case would be rendered moot. For that reason, the plaintiff (the Republican majority in the House) asked that the case be stayed, presumably to give them time to assess the new legal landscape.

Obviously, however, this was only a temporary reprieve, which might or might not become permanent. I'm guessing that you misremembered the temporary reprieve as being permanent.

mpcamb

(2,870 posts)
3. A side point- But I think we should keep calling it Obamacare. Trumpcare frightens, and
Thu May 18, 2017, 03:21 PM
May 2017

we should use that to describe the Republican replacement.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Democratic attorneys gene...