Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,757 posts)
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 10:18 AM Jul 2017

Grandparents, other extended relatives exempt from Trump travel ban, federal judge rules

Source: Washington Post

Grandparents and other extended relatives are exempt from President Trump’s travel ban, a federal judge in Hawaii declared late Thursday, again stopping the administration from implementing the president’s controversial executive order in the way that it wants.

U.S. District Judge Derrick K. Watson wrote that the government’s “narrowly defined list” of who might be exempt was not supported by either the Supreme Court decision partially unfreezing the ban or by the law.

“Common sense, for instance, dictates that close family members be defined to include grandparents,” Watson wrote. “Indeed, grandparents are the epitome of close family members. The Government’s definition excludes them. That simply cannot be.”

Watson wrote that refugees with an assurance from a resettlement agency could also be exempt from the ban.

<more>

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/grandparents-other-extended-relatives-exempt-from-trump-travel-ban-federal-judge-rules/2017/07/14/ce67aa72-6888-11e7-8eb5-cbccc2e7bfbf_story.html?utm_term=.117f2a5c7bf4

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Grandparents, other extended relatives exempt from Trump travel ban, federal judge rules (Original Post) jpak Jul 2017 OP
Time to send the Drumpfs back to Germany and Scotland IronLionZion Jul 2017 #1
Great news. grandparents should have never been on list, and for that matter, no list at all iluvtennis Jul 2017 #2
Had to research this and confirmed this ruling came after the Appeals Court claimed no jurisdiction BumRushDaShow Jul 2017 #3

BumRushDaShow

(128,896 posts)
3. Had to research this and confirmed this ruling came after the Appeals Court claimed no jurisdiction
Fri Jul 14, 2017, 12:30 PM
Jul 2017

to interpret/clarify the SCOTUS opinion for the revised ban and suggested the state could go back to the lower court to get such. So the state went back to the District court and got this ruling.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/after_9th_circuit_rejects_travel_ban_appeal_hawaii_returns_to_district_cour

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Grandparents, other exten...