Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 05:51 PM Jul 2017

U.S. Secret Service rejects suggestion it vetted Trump son's meeting

Source: Reuters




JULY 16, 2017 / 11:56 AM / AN HOUR AGO

Arshad Mohammed and Howard Schneider


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Secret Service on Sunday denied a suggestion from President Donald Trump's personal lawyer that it had vetted a meeting between the president's son and Russian nationals during the 2016 campaign.

-snip-

"Well, I wonder why the Secret Service, if this was nefarious, why the Secret Service allowed these people in. The president had Secret Service protection at that point, and that raised a question with me," Jay Sekulow, a member of the president's legal team, said on Sunday on the ABC news program "This Week."

In an emailed response to questions about Sekulow's comments, Secret Service spokesman Mason Brayman said the younger Trump was not under Secret Service protection at the time of the meeting, which included Trump's son and two senior campaign officials.

"Donald Trump, Jr. was not a protectee of the USSS in June, 2016. Thus we would not have screened anyone he was meeting with at that time," the statement said.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-idUSKBN1A10Q9

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Secret Service rejects suggestion it vetted Trump son's meeting (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2017 OP
The lawyer SUCK-U-LOW SayItLoud Jul 2017 #1
SUCK-U-LOW quick look over there.... magicarpet Jul 2017 #21
Honest mistake or slip of the tongue lapucelle Jul 2017 #2
I was thinking the same thing California_Republic Jul 2017 #7
I keep thinking the same thing...great minds I guess. BigmanPigman Jul 2017 #11
Anyone thats still a Repugnant now and that hasnt changed parties was either cstanleytech Jul 2017 #15
LOVE the way the secret service didn't take the fall for this. Catmusicfan Jul 2017 #3
Ditto. n/t MBS Jul 2017 #6
If the Secret Service had to vet everyone near the president... jvill Jul 2017 #4
And even *if* they had been present at the time... forgotmylogin Jul 2017 #22
This admin is nothing but fucking liars. truthisfreedom Jul 2017 #5
republicans caught in yet another lie Achilleaze Jul 2017 #8
So Trump's super expensive lawyer didn't knwo how the Secret Service works? Wow, smart guy there. nt USALiberal Jul 2017 #9
Ha! BumRushDaShow Jul 2017 #10
Well, they didn't deny screening the meeting Ruby the Liberal Jul 2017 #12
Its not up to them to diaper Jr. or wipe Historic NY Jul 2017 #13
Inept lawyers. Nt BootinUp Jul 2017 #14
Rebut these A**holes nwduke Jul 2017 #16
Seklulow: Not only a liar, but NastyRiffraff Jul 2017 #17
Man oh man. They're just slinging all sorts of sh*t on the wall, looking for something to stick.nt Honeycombe8 Jul 2017 #18
I wonder if we can blame the SS for the lack of manners and integrity of Trump? Thinkingabout Jul 2017 #19
Not a good idea to throw the Secret Service under the bus.... mtngirl47 Jul 2017 #20

magicarpet

(14,105 posts)
21. SUCK-U-LOW quick look over there....
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 08:25 PM
Jul 2017

.... isn't that a shiny object ? I thought I saw something just now glitter from over in that direction.

(Distraction/Diversion Ploy)

lapucelle

(18,180 posts)
2. Honest mistake or slip of the tongue
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 06:02 PM
Jul 2017

Mr. Sekulow?

Trump was in the building, so USSS was wherever Trump went. Why does Trump's mouthpiece think that USSS had the duty to vet the participants in this meeting?

California_Republic

(1,826 posts)
7. I was thinking the same thing
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 06:13 PM
Jul 2017

I was thinking the same thing

Are we about to learn that Trump is in this meeting to?

BigmanPigman

(51,554 posts)
11. I keep thinking the same thing...great minds I guess.
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 06:24 PM
Jul 2017

Perhaps there were 9 or more people there. I wouldn't be surprised if he came down the dumb waiter at Trump Tower from his penthouse.

cstanleytech

(26,211 posts)
15. Anyone thats still a Repugnant now and that hasnt changed parties was either
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 07:12 PM
Jul 2017

not born with a single honest bone in their bodies or hard them surgically removed.

jvill

(209 posts)
4. If the Secret Service had to vet everyone near the president...
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 06:04 PM
Jul 2017

... who had potentially "nefarious" plans, Trump would be sitting alone in his office wondering where all his family and associates had gone.

forgotmylogin

(7,518 posts)
22. And even *if* they had been present at the time...
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 09:21 PM
Jul 2017

I don't think it's their job to turn away people who are *on a list* as having a scheduled meeting at the venue.

It was in Trump Tower. There probably wasn't even a list. If someone important (like the owner of the building's son) meets them in the lobby and takes them into a private room, how's that supposed to set off alarms?

Is there a security station in TT now where all entrants are being patted down and x-rayed and asked what their business is at this *hotel with a restaurant*?

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
12. Well, they didn't deny screening the meeting
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 06:28 PM
Jul 2017

Only that DJT the Lesser wasn't on their protectee list at the time.

If Sekulow is right and SS did screen the attendees, that could mean that DJT was in attendance.

Pick your poison. Either Sekulow lied (shocker) or he spoke when he shouldn't have.

nwduke

(348 posts)
16. Rebut these A**holes
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 07:13 PM
Jul 2017

The media is at fault to allow the trump mafia pundits outright lie, and not confront them with the facts. Come on media, do your job and protect the 1st amendment!

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
17. Seklulow: Not only a liar, but
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 07:47 PM
Jul 2017

a STUPID liar. This should have been obvious, or at least he should have checked it with--you know--the Secret Service. Just like Reuters did.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
19. I wonder if we can blame the SS for the lack of manners and integrity of Trump?
Sun Jul 16, 2017, 08:07 PM
Jul 2017

Maybe we can blame the for the life of corruption Don Jr has been exposed to, maybe the SS should have controlled the interactions with his children.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Secret Service rejec...