Russian lawyer who met Trump Jr. says ready to testify to Congress
Source: Reuters
JULY 19, 2017 / 5:07 AM / 3 HOURS AGO
MOSCOW (Reuters) - The Russian lawyer who met Donald Trump Jr after his father won the 2016 U.S. Republican presidential nomination has said she is ready to testify to Congress to dispel what she called "mass hysteria" about the encounter.
President Donald Trump's eldest son eagerly agreed last year to meet Natalia Veselnitskaya, a woman he was told was a Russian government lawyer who might have damaging information about Democratic White House rival Hillary Clinton, according to emails released by Donald Trump Jr.
Veselnitskaya has previously said she is a private lawyer, that she never obtained damaging information about Clinton, and that she has no ties with the Kremlin.
"I'm ready to clarify the situation behind this mass hysteria but only through lawyers or testifying in the Senate," Veselnitskaya said in an interview with Russia's Kremlin-backed RT TV channel released late on Tuesday.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-lawyer-idUSKBN1A40QA
Roy Rolling
(6,911 posts)All she needs is wardrobe and the "glamor squad" and she'll be ready to lie on camera.
Botany
(70,490 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Maxheader
(4,372 posts)be coming from this country's
greatest enemy. when Khrushchev
slammed his shoe down on the podium
and shouted.."My vas pokhoronim!"...
"We will bury you!"..Still goes with
the military and pooootin.
VaBchTgerLily
(231 posts)bluestarone
(16,906 posts)hahahahahahhahahahahaha NOTHING!!!!!
DK504
(3,847 posts)Yo, Natalia, this "mass hysteria" is an illegal act. We know you don't have the rule of law in Putin's autocratic land, so until you understand constitutional laws of America, STFU.
snort
(2,334 posts)C Moon
(12,212 posts)Yavin4
(35,437 posts)For your consideration.
OnDoutside
(19,953 posts)Tanuki
(14,918 posts)at their little post-prandial tete-a-tete so that Scoops Jr. and his merry band of collaborators could keep their stories consistent.
lark
(23,091 posts)No big surprise there.
neohippie
(1,142 posts)Why does she need a lawyer to testify if she's a lawyer?
I hope they ask her about that money laundering trial that was mysteriously settled after Trump fired Preet Bharara