Elon Musk Says He Has 'Verbal' OK To Build N.Y.-D.C. Hyperloop
Source: NPR
A plan to build an ultrafast Hyperloop One tube train has been given "verbal [government] approval to connect large cities on the East Coast, tech entrepreneur Elon Musk says. He adds that the system would whisk passengers from New York to Washington, D.C., in 29 minutes.
After his tweet about the plan set off intense interest, Musk added a clarification, stating, "Still a lot of work needed to receive formal approval, but am optimistic that will occur rapidly."
We're seeking more details from Musk and his companies that are involved in the Hyperloop project, from the vehicle unit to the Boring Company, which would dig the tunnels. He did not specify, for instance, which agency had given its approval, or when construction might begin.
Engineers who are working on the project have the goal of sending pods through a tube at speeds of more than 700 mph, using magnetic levitation and an electric motor in a vacuum environment.
Read more: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/07/20/538328487/elon-musk-says-he-has-verbal-ok-to-build-n-y-d-c-hyperloop
...and a big net at the end of the line...
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)Sanity Claws
(21,841 posts)I think not.
According to Samuel Goldwyn, a verbal agreement is not worth the paper it's written on.
Yogi Berra probably said something like that too.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Then we'll talk.
LisaM
(27,794 posts)I just don't.
EX500rider
(10,810 posts)Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)Heard Al Gore himself speak the words. Elon Musk has a great deal to do with that.
Not why can't we do that in America?
LisaM
(27,794 posts)But only as tools to enjoy a much more pastoral world than the one he envisions. High speed transport across the desert? Sure. Between NYC and DC? Not so sure; there's a lot of pretty parts of the country to enjoy.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Utterly meaningless.
FSogol
(45,452 posts)vi5
(13,305 posts)...but good lord can't we just work on getting the basic, day to day public transit that most people use better before we start throwing money, tax breaks, or whatever the fuck else at supercharged pipe dreams just because they have Elon Musk's name attached to them?
And yes, I realize that Musk saying he has "verbal o.k." is not exactly contracts or anything, but this really does seem like something that are elected officials would get themselves all giddy over.
msongs
(67,365 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Yet still worth more than empty bumper stickers pretending to be wisdom.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)I saw it a few nights ago, with Al in attendance. Elon Musk is probably the most important person in the world of climate change and technology. Without him, India would not have signed the Paris accords. I won't spoil the movie. His words and his connections carry a GREAT deal of weight.
EarthFirst
(2,899 posts)(Or even LA/DC or LA/Raleigh, NC...)
Than this project, to be honest.
bucolic_frolic
(43,063 posts)the information super highway was supposed to promote remote workplaces
everyone was going to Skype
there was insufficient demand for the SST
just because you can build it doesn't mean you should
cost-benefit analyses are based on tweaked assumptions to suit an agenda
it's all about $$$$
TimeToGo
(1,366 posts)"How can you be in two places at once, when you're not anywhere at all?" As they say.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,325 posts)TimeToGo
(1,366 posts)Firesign Theatre
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)even a monorail, or skyline cars, pleasee
elleng
(130,759 posts)IMPORTANT!
sakabatou
(42,141 posts)Then any sufficient dent could destroy it.
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)CK_John
(10,005 posts)other areas of the country will conflict with fracking.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)We've already got one of those at Old Dominion University (still under construction)...
underpants
(182,632 posts)harun
(11,348 posts)the Martian atmosphere is. So on Mars you don't need the tube, yet can use all the same setup.
mitch96
(13,871 posts)there is the available land already punched out of the landscape. You could have stops at highway interchanges.... No need to dig tunnels.. To me that would be a maintenance and construction headache. Above ground continuous structures could be squirted out by the same technology that creates bridge support structures... Just misc ramblings of an idle mind...
m