FBI, Homeland Security warn of more 'antifa' attacks
Source: Politico
Confidential documents call the anarchists that seek to counter white supremacists domestic terrorists.
By JOSH MEYER 09/01/2017 04:55 AM EDT
Federal authorities have been warning state and local officials since early 2016 that leftist extremists known as antifa had become increasingly confrontational and dangerous, so much so that the Department of Homeland Security formally classified their activities as domestic terrorist violence, according to interviews and confidential law enforcement documents obtained by POLITICO.
Since well before the Aug. 12 rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, turned deadly, DHS has been issuing warnings about the growing likelihood of lethal violence between the left-wing anarchists and right-wing white supremacist and nationalist groups.
Previously unreported documents disclose that by April 2016, authorities believed that anarchist extremists were the primary instigators of violence at public rallies against a range of targets. They were blamed by authorities for attacks on the police, government and political institutions, along with symbols of the capitalist system, racism, social injustice and fascism, according to a confidential 2016 joint intelligence assessment by DHS and the FBI.
After President Donald Trumps election in November, the antifa activists locked onto another target his supporters, especially those from white supremacist and nationalist groups suddenly turning out in droves to hail his victory, support crackdowns on immigrants and Muslims and to protest efforts to remove symbols of the Confederacy.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/01/antifa-charlottesville-violence-fbi-242235
bucolic_frolic
(43,123 posts)one man's Freedom Fighter is another man's terrorist
it's all a matter of perspective, who's in power
klook
(12,154 posts)So they'd like us to believe.
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)Ligyron
(7,624 posts)But Trump's brain-dead supporters are just patriots, right?
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)on local, state, and national levels. They're also getting grief from both the conservative AND the liberal political class. Sounds like they are having success then.
The state can't have the working class organizing for their own self-defense because eventually they'll understand who ELSE is the enemy alongside the fascists. And who abets the fascists. Ultimately, the fascists are part of the defense of the capitalist state AGAINST the working class. Those two are on the same side and it's NOT on the side of the masses.
Remember the assassinations of the 1960s/70s. Same modus operandi from the state.
randr
(12,409 posts)TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)randr
(12,409 posts)Even if the loose organization is made up of progressives who believe they can no longer stand still, the group is ripe for exploytation by any infiltrator that whats to only make the left look bad. This is what happened to many groups that protested during Nam and it is a well documented tactic of the opposition.
I hope we all wake up before we are branded as equal to the racists nazi clansmen.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)will just put their activities on hold when counter protests are peaceful... These groups want to eliminate non-whites from this society. That is their ultimate goal.
Turning a blind eye to their provocations will only embolden them. Like I said, I don't want to be any movement's martyr...
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)Doing repression of other people with violence is the tactics of Nazis and KKKlansmen and White Nationalists. If you give them the fights they want, you are embolden them. If you want a more peaceful society, fight for it in peaceful ways - violence feed more violence.
ancianita
(36,017 posts)onecaliberal
(32,816 posts)ancianita
(36,017 posts)"Anarchist extremists" are usually police infiltrators and their provocateurs paid to justify police beatdowns of otherwise peaceful protestors with right on their side.
U.S. DEFENDERS (antifa) will be framed as the bad guys, as they were in Germany, Italy, Spain and Wall Street.
We here don't have to buy into this bullshit.
They'll hang tough against police-protected hate groups.
people
(623 posts)And, are there any ANY DHS or FBI documents that call white supremacists or neo-nazis "domestic terrorists"?
ancianita
(36,017 posts)and anti-police state.
These days, the FBI plays objective with all info -- but it has drawn its past hate group data mostly from SPLC.
Police are lately trying to challenge the anti-hate groups with their own self-serving arrest records, which we know haven't been reported to the FBI for decades on any other groups. That's how SPLC came to fill that data vacuum.
The FBI pulls back from police departments that claim to monitor their own policies and practices.
So we the people are caught between legal territory, professional tradition and our democratic actions.
The fucking think blue line.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)But remember that such things we hear about tend to be filtered through spokespeople and politicians unless it's very public organized plot like that foiled ambush at an officer's funeral awhile back.
ToxMarz
(2,166 posts)Response to ToxMarz (Reply #10)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)Response to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #19)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ToxMarz
(2,166 posts)Did you join DU today just to respond to this? Welcome /s
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)Thanks for pointing out the bullshitters
ToxMarz
(2,166 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)ProgressiveValue
(130 posts)If the Nazi crowd take a swing first, then it is self defense and justified for ANTIFA to defend themselves. It is a dangerous road to start justifying physical assault on people, who have not attacked you, just because they spew filth from their vile mouths. Because it is also justified for them to defend themselves if they are attacked first; and they are likely to be conceal carrying. I'm not sure you can write a law that says it is ok to commit criminal assault against people who say things you don't like and it is illegal for them to defend themselves against that assault, without the other side turning that against you.
DK504
(3,847 posts)another way the media misses the point once again. They are following the Rethug extremists semantic bullshit.
If someone calls them selves anti-fascists they are lumped in with the anarchists. That's a good way to get the police to crack down on democrats protests. They use the "antifa" (who the hell thought that one up?) to cause more violence during real protests.
AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)and Antifa should make it clear that they are anti-Fascist, particular against the Fascist white supremacist core that make up Trump's core base.
Don't forget that Putin's Russian Oligarchy should also be classified as pro-Fascist, and if Trump doesn't end up with impeachment proceedings, then our very Republican lead government may be Fascist-leaning as well, particularly if it is the Russians who help them get re-elected!
Coventina
(27,093 posts)ancianita
(36,017 posts)Jazzgirl
(3,744 posts)Sorry but antifa are not the same as the Nazis and KKK. Also, that crap about them starting the violence in Charlottesville is wrong too. It was real obvious the racist right wingers started it. The protesters were walking away. One of the racists turned around and looked at the others and said "lets go". Stop equating them with the racists. They keep marching out the same talking points whenever someone not on the right resists.
sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)dembotoz
(16,799 posts)do you prove you are not
and by not proving your are not do you then risk being labelled a terrorist?
Once labeled a potential terrorist the state can do pretty much what ever they fucking want to you
Voltaire2
(12,996 posts)was yours?
AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)With a government infiltrated by fawning sycophants and brown shirts by that piece of shit Trump. Controlling the levers of power means you get to frame the argument and the lap dog media - always looking for a "if it bleeds it leads" story - will sing it from the roof tops.