Scoop: Trump phones Schumer for help on health care, worrying GOP
Source: Axios
Mike Allen Jonathan Swan 11 hrs ago
President Trump telephoned Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer on Friday in an effort to revive health-care legislation, Republican sources said. Trump was seeking "a path forward on health care," a GOP source said.
Be smart: The president's call shows he may be open to future deals with Democratic leaders, in the mold of the "Chuck and Nancy" agreements on the debt limit and immigration that he struck in September.
Although it's not known what Trump proposed or how Schumer responded, word traveled fast among Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill:
The initial reaction among some Republicans was consternation, even though they didn't know the upshot of the call.
Read more: https://www.axios.com/trump-phones-schumer-for-help-on-health-care-miffing-some-in-gop-2493868663.html
Trump calls Schumer for help on reviving health care push
President Trump called Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Friday to ask for help on reviving health-care legislation.
Trump wanted "to see if the Dems want to do a great HealthCare Bill," Trump said in a tweet confirming the call Saturday morning.
Link to tweet
Trump, who has known Schumer for years, has previously reached out to the fellow New Yorker and Democratic leader on issues.
Trump sided with Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) over GOP leaders in early September on a short-term bill to fund the government and raise the debt ceiling for three months while providing hurricane and disaster recovery aide after a storm battered Texas.
Trump's call with Schumer comes as Republicans look to score their first major legislative victory this year after maintaining unified control of government.
more
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/354347-trump-called-schumer-for-help-on-reviving-health-care-push-report
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)roll back birth control:
By Steve Benen
The Affordable Care Acts approach to birth control is straightforward, and at least at first blush, noncontroversial. As regular readers know, under Obamacare, contraception is covered as standard preventive care that insurers are required to provide. Houses of worship are exempt, and thanks to the Supreme Courts 5-4 Hobby Lobby ruling, that exemption is quite broad.
Donald Trump or more accurately, the people responsible for making policy decisions in his administration are of the opinion that the exemption isnt nearly broad enough. Today, the presidents team dramatically altered the ACAs policy, opening a dangerous door in the process.
The Trump administration loosened Obama-era birth control requirements Friday, saying just about any provider of health insurance could refuse to pay for an employees birth control if they show sincerely held religious or moral objections.
The new regulations protect groups such as the Little Sisters of the Poor from litigation if they refuse to provide contraceptive coverage, but widen the pool of those shielded to include non-profits, for-profit companies, other non-governmental employers, and schools and universities.
The practical effects of the change are obvious: some American women who receive contraception at no cost will, as a result of the Trump administrations new policy, have to pay higher out-of-pocket costs for birth control because their employer says so.
How many employers? No one really knows for sure. HHS says only about 200 entities are likely to scrap their workers birth-control coverage, but thats based on the number of employers that filed lawsuits against the Obama administrations policy. The trouble is, now that Team Trump has opened the door to every employer, its hard to predict just how many will take advantage.
This doesnt come as too big of a surprise. A leaked draft of the policy came to public light in June, a month after the president signed an executive order he said was intended to restore religious liberty.
Fatima Goss Graves, president of the National Womens Law Center, told NBC News, By taking away womens access to no-cost birth control coverage, the rules give employers a license to discriminate against women.
By all appearances, Trump administration officials know this, but theres no reason to believe they care.
All of this policymaking is regulatory, not legislative, so theres no meaningful role for Congress to play. As we discussed in June, when drafting the Affordable Care Act, lawmakers did not specify what would constitute womens preventive care benefits; it was up to Obama administration officials to come up with the list, which ended up including things like contraception, domestic-abuse screenings, breastfeeding equipment, etc.
After the election, the power shifted to the Trump administrations hands with no new legislation necessary.
Of course, the irony of the circumstances is apparently lost on the White House. The thrice-married, serial-adulterer president, who was recorded bragging about sexually assaulting women, and who was accused by several women of doing exactly what he boasted about doing, is now the same president whos rolling back the clock on womens access to contraception.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trump-rolls-back-the-clock-womens-access-birth-control
Orsino
(37,428 posts)He wants something he can call a win before the last wheel comes off his presidency.
dalton99a
(81,464 posts)tanyev
(42,552 posts)OnDoutside
(19,956 posts)mopinko
(70,089 posts)i wouldnt make any deals w this asshole till he makes good on the last one.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)listen to Ds and take their advice.
BigmanPigman
(51,585 posts)I said, "HUH?" He just fucked with both control yesterday. He is so psycho!
The two political commentators/strategists said that they think he tweeted this because he wanted to "light a fire under the Repubs in Congress".