Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,197 posts)
Sun Oct 8, 2017, 11:30 AM Oct 2017

Thats actually not true: Chris Wallace tears NRA executive director a new one for lying about gun

Source: raw story



‘That’s actually not true’: Chris Wallace tears NRA executive director a new one for lying about gun control
08 Oct 2017 at 11:15 ET


Fox News host Chris Wallace on Sunday took on NRA Executive Director Chris Cox about his organization’s resistance to gun safety laws following the recent mass shooting in Las Vegas.

“You say common decency [means] let’s wait [on discussing gun laws], what’s enough time?” Wallace wondered. “I mean, here were 58 people killed, almost 500 injured. Is it common decency to wait a day, two days, a week, a month. I mean, it is understandable — I know you don’t agree with [Democrats’] solution but what’s wrong with saying we need to address this?”

Cox, however, turned the question into an opportunity to attack House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Hillary Clinton, who he accused of wanting to abolish all gun rights.

“Is that a sensible way to have this conversation, to try to turn it into class warfare,” Wallace shot back, “where if you’re for gun control somehow you’re part of an elite?”

...............more......................

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/thats-actually-not-true-chris-wallace-tears-nra-executive-director-a-new-one-for-lying-about-gun-control/



Chris Cox has all the Foxnews, RW talking points down pat. Good for Wallace for bringing some truth to the show.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thats actually not true: Chris Wallace tears NRA executive director a new one for lying about gun (Original Post) riversedge Oct 2017 OP
Who are they to decide what "common decency" is? Merlot Oct 2017 #1
"Now isn't the time" means "talking points still under development" nt Dreamer Tatum Oct 2017 #4
No, it means let's ignore this until it goes away Merlot Oct 2017 #7
They have forever forfeited being an arbiter of any decency Cary Oct 2017 #9
so Chris Wallace is trying to be a true journalist once in a while mdbl Oct 2017 #2
So he takes dead aim at the NRA bullshit on national TV Dreamer Tatum Oct 2017 #3
if you like mdbl Oct 2017 #5
Wayne LaPierre snowybirdie Oct 2017 #6
He called her "Steinfein." Cary Oct 2017 #10
Better response... Grins Oct 2017 #8
What bullshit, the poor woman kacekwl Oct 2017 #11
Say "lie". Say "bribed by gun firms". sharedvalues Oct 2017 #12

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
1. Who are they to decide what "common decency" is?
Sun Oct 8, 2017, 11:40 AM
Oct 2017

They say "now is not the time to talk about guns" and everyone falls for that line, repeating it incredulously and asking "when is the right time?" Instead they should be asking "who are you to decide what we can talk about and when?"

It's like how climate change got turned into "is it man made or not?" instead of "who cares who caused it, let's take steps to solve it."

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
7. No, it means let's ignore this until it goes away
Sun Oct 8, 2017, 12:18 PM
Oct 2017

the talking points around gun safety are always the same anyhow.

Cary

(11,746 posts)
9. They have forever forfeited being an arbiter of any decency
Sun Oct 8, 2017, 01:34 PM
Oct 2017

Even before inflicting #fakepresident on us.

mdbl

(4,973 posts)
2. so Chris Wallace is trying to be a true journalist once in a while
Sun Oct 8, 2017, 11:54 AM
Oct 2017

Let me know when good journalism becomes a standard at Fux nooze. Until then, I'll pass.

kacekwl

(7,016 posts)
11. What bullshit, the poor woman
Sun Oct 8, 2017, 02:14 PM
Oct 2017

working the late shift in "Chicago" who wants to protect herself is not what we are talking about. Is she carrying a weapon with a 100 magazine capacity? Is she carrying a full or semi-automatic in her purse ? Does she have said weapons in her home for protection ? These types of weapons are for killing mass amounts of people . Except for the few who go into their backyard and blow off a thousand rounds for fun. I say in that case they can CERTAINLY go to a range rent a automatic weapon and go at it. Then leave it there and go home .

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Thats actually not true: ...