Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,174 posts)
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 01:55 PM Oct 2017

Why Has the E.P.A. Shifted on Toxic Chemicals? An Industry Insider Helps Call the Shots

Source: nytimes




Eric Lipton
38-48 minutes

WASHINGTON — For years, the Environmental Protection Agency has struggled to prevent an ingredient once used in stain-resistant carpets and nonstick pans from contaminating drinking water.

The chemical, perfluorooctanoic acid, or PFOA, has been linked to kidney cancer, birth defects, immune system disorders and other serious health problems.

So scientists and administrators in the E.P.A.’s Office of Water were alarmed in late May when a top Trump administration appointee insisted upon the rewriting of a rule to make it harder to track the health consequences of the chemical, and therefore regulate it.

The revision was among more than a dozen demanded by the appointee, Nancy B. Beck, after she joined the E.P.A.’s toxic chemical unit in May as a top deputy. For the previous five years, she had been an executive at the American Chemistry Council, the chemical industry’s main trade association.

The changes directed by Dr. Beck may result in an “underestimation of the potential risks to human health and the environment” caused by PFOA and other so-called legacy chemicals no longer sold on the market, the Office of Water’s top official warned in a confidential internal memo obtained by The New York Times........................................



Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/21/us/trump-epa-chemicals-regulations.html













Maddie Stone‏Verified account @themadstone 2h2 hours ago
Replying to @themadstone

I have received responses from oil industry spox when writing about allegations of serious crimes that were less vitriolic

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Has the E.P.A. Shifted on Toxic Chemicals? An Industry Insider Helps Call the Shots (Original Post) riversedge Oct 2017 OP
so many assholes and the shit coming out of them Angry Dragon Oct 2017 #1
Its so sad when this level of corruption seems to be becoming the norm. Mr. Sparkle Oct 2017 #2
pre-emptive softening or eradication of responsibilty They_Live Oct 2017 #3
Why, because EPA is now the KochPA..Koch Bros own c) Stainmaster & toxic brands regulated stuffmatters Oct 2017 #4

They_Live

(3,231 posts)
3. pre-emptive softening or eradication of responsibilty
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 04:45 PM
Oct 2017

for poisoning people (and everything else) through pollution. How very evil of them. These creeps all need to be in prison, sooner rather than later.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Why Has the E.P.A. Shifte...