Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Oct 29, 2017, 10:41 AM Oct 2017

Roger Stone vows legal action over Twitter suspension

Source: Politico




By BRENT D. GRIFFITHS 10/28/2017 06:15 PM EDT Updated 10/29/2017 09:23 AM EDT

Roger Stone, President Donald Trump's longetime associate, said "the battle against free speech has just begun" as the longtime political provocateur tangles with Twitter over his account's suspension.

"This is a strange way to do business and part and parcel of the systematic effort by the tech left to censor and silence conservative voices," Stone said in an email to POLITICO. " Stone added that after communicating with "prominent telecommunication attorneys," he has decided to bring legal action against Twitter. It's not clear what the basis for that action would be.

Stone lashed out at CNN anchor Don Lemon and others on Friday night, seemingly responding to reports that an indictment from special prosecutor Robert Mueller was imminent in the ongoing probe into the Trump election campaign's alleged ties to Russia.

Stone tweeted that Lemon was "dumber than dog ----" and deserved to be mocked and punished.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/28/roger-stone-suspended-twitter-244274

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Roger Stone vows legal action over Twitter suspension (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2017 OP
Bring it, Stone. Spin your wheels. Spend your money on a fool's errand. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2017 #1
I'm sure that he will try to raise money online from suckers to pay for this Jose Garcia Oct 2017 #24
LOL. And what would his argument be? bearsfootball516 Oct 2017 #2
Poor liddle Roger hurt his bottom RainCaster Oct 2017 #3
Standing on the street corner or on your property are protected by free speech underpants Oct 2017 #4
Isn't Twitter a private organization, not gov't? keithbvadu2 Oct 2017 #5
Read the terms of service, dummy C_U_L8R Oct 2017 #6
Maybe we should pass a constitutional amendment. LisaL Oct 2017 #7
Dumbass Roger forgot he signed the TOS when he signed up. Thor_MN Oct 2017 #8
I just wonder why it took them so long sellitman Oct 2017 #9
Go stand and scream on the street corner with the other nuts. That's your only "right." PSPS Oct 2017 #10
Stone's duty is to make a song and dance about anything to distract from Mueller's charges muriel_volestrangler Oct 2017 #11
Roger "Slope Forehead Neanderthal" Stone. longship Oct 2017 #12
He really is a pinhead! Proud Democrat Oct 2017 #15
The only other person who is murielm99 Oct 2017 #18
Both of them look as if the doctor went ham on those forceps during birth. n/t reflection Oct 2017 #28
Stone's purported basis for legal action? Antitrust laws. He'd already said that yesterday highplainsdem Oct 2017 #13
An antitrust suit against the one social media giant that hasn't yet made a profit? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2017 #29
The "tech left" oberliner Oct 2017 #14
I like to think this was a shot over the bow by Twitter aimed at Trump LiberalLovinLug Oct 2017 #16
I couldn't see Twitter banning Trump as long as he's in the white house. xor Oct 2017 #22
"This is a strange way to do business?" Think Republican. KY_EnviroGuy Oct 2017 #17
Hey he threatened to kill journalists. He deserves that suspension. Initech Oct 2017 #19
they scream about FREEDOM but what they want is FREEDOM FROM CONSEQUENCES Skittles Oct 2017 #20
I'm pretty sure twitter or any other private site can ban whomever they want. xor Oct 2017 #21
Twitter is a private comp with a Terms of Service that he violated Roland99 Oct 2017 #23
Can we sign up Roger as a supporter of Net Neutrality onenote Oct 2017 #25
It's Ironic-Republicans Love Tort Reform Until It's Their Turn to Sue dlk Oct 2017 #26
Now imagine if this was Limbaugh or Jones show Homer Wells Oct 2017 #27

bearsfootball516

(6,376 posts)
2. LOL. And what would his argument be?
Sun Oct 29, 2017, 10:44 AM
Oct 2017

Twitter is pretty clear on what you can say and what's prohibited. He clearly violated it.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
8. Dumbass Roger forgot he signed the TOS when he signed up.
Sun Oct 29, 2017, 11:03 AM
Oct 2017

You have no freedom of speech on Twitter. You can say whatever you want, but they can ban you for it.

Why anyone would care about freaking Twitter, I don't get - the most stupid means of communication conceived of yet.

Dumb as a box of rocks.

sellitman

(11,606 posts)
9. I just wonder why it took them so long
Sun Oct 29, 2017, 11:09 AM
Oct 2017

I've seen his vile Tweets before and wondered how he got away with them. He is just the nastiest person in a bunch of nasties.

Good riddance!

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
11. Stone's duty is to make a song and dance about anything to distract from Mueller's charges
Sun Oct 29, 2017, 12:01 PM
Oct 2017

It doesn't matter that any non-moron knows Stone hasn't a leg to stand on after the crude insults he threw out. He is there to get the morons - ie Trump's Very Base - to feel under attack, and get them thinking they are the victims, not American democracy.

highplainsdem

(48,957 posts)
13. Stone's purported basis for legal action? Antitrust laws. He'd already said that yesterday
Sun Oct 29, 2017, 12:55 PM
Oct 2017

via his StoneColdTruth Twitter account and an interview with a RW Gateway Pundit reporter.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
29. An antitrust suit against the one social media giant that hasn't yet made a profit?
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 04:34 PM
Oct 2017

Jeez, the man can't even troll properly.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,168 posts)
16. I like to think this was a shot over the bow by Twitter aimed at Trump
Sun Oct 29, 2017, 03:24 PM
Oct 2017

So that when they finally do ban Donnie, it won't come as a big a shock.

At least thats what I'm hoping.

xor

(1,204 posts)
22. I couldn't see Twitter banning Trump as long as he's in the white house.
Sun Oct 29, 2017, 08:01 PM
Oct 2017

I can only imagine how much revenue they get from all the traffic he brings.

xor

(1,204 posts)
21. I'm pretty sure twitter or any other private site can ban whomever they want.
Sun Oct 29, 2017, 08:00 PM
Oct 2017

Am I not understanding how things are supposed to work here?

onenote

(42,674 posts)
25. Can we sign up Roger as a supporter of Net Neutrality
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 02:27 PM
Oct 2017

Since he seems awfully concerned about being censored on the Internet.

Homer Wells

(1,576 posts)
27. Now imagine if this was Limbaugh or Jones show
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 02:37 PM
Oct 2017

Where they will cut off anyone who dares challenge the conserva-speak of their listeners. I wonder if Stone has any problem with that?
Pretty much the same thing. Twitter has the right to deny ANYONE they do not approve of. Barring the entertainment value, I would love them do the same thing to Donnie Drumpf.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Roger Stone vows legal ac...