Report: Conyers settled wrongful dismissal complaint over 'sexual advances'
Source: The Hill
Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), the longest-serving current House member, reportedly settled a wrongful dismissal complaint in 2015 after a former employee accused him of firing her for resisting his "sexual advances."
Four former staffers signed affidavits, three of which were notarized, saying that Conyers, top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, repeatedly made engaged in unwanted sexual behavior with his female staff, BuzzFeed News reported Monday night.
Documents examined by BuzzFeed described a wide-range of inappropriate conduct, including making requests for sexual favors, caressing and touching, as well as having his staff contact and transport women they believed were sexually involved with him.
Four unnamed sources who were involved with the case confirmed to BuzzFeed News that the documents are authentic.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/361301-report-conyers-settled-wrongful-dismissal-complaint-over-sexual-advances
CTyankee
(63,889 posts)riverwalker
(8,694 posts)Now hes crowing about the biggest story of the year and now all of Congress knows my name
Link to tweet
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But the evidence here speaks for itself.
Have you read the affidavits?
highplainsdem
(48,910 posts)out and try to keep the real source of the leak hidden:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029869670
Initech
(100,038 posts)That fucking dick needs to be kicked off Twitter ASAP.
BeyondGeography
(39,346 posts)http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2017/11/21/conyers-sexual-misconduct/107895986/
cilla4progress
(24,717 posts)Always liked him.
Men and their dicks.
Response to cilla4progress (Reply #3)
rzemanfl This message was self-deleted by its author.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)between the kinds of complaints being aired about him and those against Conyers, Moore, and Trump.
Anyone with common sense can see this.
7962
(11,841 posts)just as there are different levels of the same crime.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)I'm leaning towards yes...We should have the moral majority the right wing hypocrites claim all of the time.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,121 posts)so disappointed to hear this about Rep. Conyers... such a strong leader on progressive issues. Ugghhh!!
orleans
(34,040 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,121 posts)FarPoint
(12,287 posts)The two parties are in an agreement...it's done and Over.... it's done... settled.
mr_liberal
(1,017 posts)FarPoint
(12,287 posts)I will respect their decision to end it...they should too..
rzemanfl
(29,554 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Are pretty significantly different from taking 14 year old's to remote homes and making them put their hands on your privates, or forcing your hands down the pants of 16 year olds ...
Not saying 'it's okay' by any stretch, but ... it's pretty different in the grand scheme of things.
I'd imagine Conyers isn't banned from any shopping malls for creeping on teenage girls.
But watch in astonishment as utterly twisted logic ensues from the right-wing as they attempt to paint the less-severe crimes perpetrated by Conyers as being far-more severe than anything Moore stands accused of ... just because he's ... well ... a Democrat, and ... that other thing.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,142 posts)is very bad as well. The settlement was just a couple of years ago. Conyers is 88.
7962
(11,841 posts)Too many people are happy to savage one side and give a pass for their own for basically the same offense.
Whether we're talking about producers, TV personalities, Congressmen or Presidents.
BumRushDaShow
(128,455 posts)this has always been a "societal" problem (and really, is world-wide). The various fits and starts of the "Women's Lib" movement came out of this continual and pervasive issue.
Although you do have some women who prey and harass, it's mostly a male thing and millions have done it because it was par for the course in the mentality of women being the "inferior or weaker sex", leading to the encouragement of men to establish their libido in various ways. Not all obviously did such but quite a few, even "innocently", participated in what could be considered "denigrating behavior" when it comes to women.
What we are seeing are essentially low-hanging fruit (public figures) now being excoriated for behaviors and practices that have been going on for a long long time and were considered "acceptable" by the power structure.
Lulu KC
(2,560 posts)Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)Response to 7962 (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
BeyondGeography
(39,346 posts)If we take the House and this tenured old fool is re-elected, hes going to lead impeachment hearings...kindly stand down, asshole.
BumRushDaShow
(128,455 posts)and even wrote a whole book about it...
But we know how that went (or didn't go).
Yupster
(14,308 posts)He has been elected and reelected every two years since 1964 and the lowest percentage he's ever gotten is 77 %.
BeyondGeography
(39,346 posts)Its a safe seat, hes 88 years old and he stopped being effective 10 years ago. Think of all the talented young Democrats who could have replaced him by now. Instead, we have to watch him game the system to try and avoid an ignoble departure, which will surely happen anyway.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)I believe in term limits.
Not because of Republican versus Democratic, but because of Strom Thurmond and Bobby Byrd.
Thurmond wasn't going to be challenged by a Republican because he was a legend. He wasn't going to be beaten by a Democrat because he was a Republican in South Carolina. So he lived his last years in a hospital getting wheeled out for key votes at age 100.
Byrd wasn't going to be beaten by a Democrat because he was a legend and he wasn't going to get beaten by a Republican because it was West Virginia (how times have changed), so he could be a former Ku Klux Klansman as the President of the Senate at age 90.
It's for those situations that I'd support term limits, or how about a mandatory retirement age of 80.
BeyondGeography
(39,346 posts)Thats how we wind up with barely coherent people like Conyers chairing committees. Part of the reason why he is receiving zero support within his own party right now is that he has overstayed his welcome and the knives are out.
truthisfreedom
(23,139 posts)Until we can figure out just how much mother Russia is f-ing with us.
BeyondGeography
(39,346 posts)Then again, please do me a favor and dont try to explain.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)Russia didn't make John Conyers fondle his staffers. Russia didn't make Anthony Wiener send dick pics. Russia didn't make Bill repeatedly break his marital vows.
So Jan Bradyesque, "Russia, Russia, Russia!"
7962
(11,841 posts)Response to truthisfreedom (Reply #18)
njhoneybadger This message was self-deleted by its author.
IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)Jose Garcia
(2,583 posts)Response to oberliner (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Abouttime
(675 posts)Nothing but a cheap shot hit job from the purveyors of FAKE NEWS.
Don't fall for it!
Conyers will be the chair of the house Judiciary Committee next year, he will be our man leading the way to tRump's impeachment. This is all a desperate ploy by trump to take him out.
B2G
(9,766 posts)because these women, who signed affidavits, just KNEW Trump would be elected.
Get ahold of yourself.
7962
(11,841 posts)As the door swings open, this wave is going to catch many. From BOTH parties
rzemanfl
(29,554 posts)If it ain't notarized its a statement.
B2G
(9,766 posts)rzemanfl
(29,554 posts)Maybe you could help me out and elaborate on what your point is exactly.
rzemanfl
(29,554 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)It's just an affidavit that is not notarized.
rzemanfl
(29,554 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)And a car lacking a motor is yet a car, capable of doing so much...
7962
(11,841 posts)With some it never stops.
24601
(3,955 posts)be be a notary, but that's only one of the options. They are often administered by officers of a court who are not notaries.
Response to oberliner (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Baclava
(12,047 posts)but he paid for the shush anyway
Response to Baclava (Reply #46)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)system worked. The employee made a complaint, went through the process and a "settlement" was reached. A leap to call it "severance pay", it would only be severance pay if all employees received severance.
If the other woman feel they were wrongfully dismissed, they need to get a Lawyer and file claims.