Brexit: Electoral Commission launches inquiry into leave campaign funding
Source: The Guardian
Vote Leave is under investigation by the Electoral Commission over whether it breached the £7m EU referendum spending limit, with allegations being made that it channelled funds for a social Brexit media campaign via £625,000 in donations to a student.
The watchdog said that the new information meant it had reasonable grounds to suspect an offence may have been committed and said it would examine if the Boris Johnson and Michael Gove-fronted campaign had filed its returns correctly.
Its unexpected intervention came as the commission was facing a legal challenge from remain grassroots campaigners, unhappy that it had dropped a previous investigation into the spending of Vote Leave and satellite Brexit campaigns that are accused of not being properly independent of it.
During the referendum campaign, fashion design student Darren Grimes, who was then 23 and ran a campaign called BeLeave, was given £625,000 by Vote Leave. The cash was paid directly to a data analytics firm specialising in social media called AggregateIQ that had also been heavily used by Vote Leave.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/nov/20/electoral-commission-launches-inquiry-into-leave-campaign-funding
Related: Follow the data: does a legal document link Brexit campaigns to US billionaire?
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/14/robert-mercer-cambridge-analytica-leave-eu-referendum-brexit-campaigns?CMP=share_btn_tw
But the Observer has seen a confidential document that provides clear evidence of a link between the two campaigns. More precisely, evidence of a close working relationship between the two data analytics firms employed by the campaigns AggregateIQ, which Vote Leave hired, and Cambridge Analytica, retained by Leave.EU.
Because, legally, these two companies AggregateIQ in Canada and Cambridge Analytica, an American company based in London, have nothing to connect them publicly. But this intellectual property licence shown to the Observer tells a different story. This created a binding exclusive worldwide agreement in perpetuity for all of AggregateIQs intellectual property to be used by SCL Elections (a British firm that created Cambridge Analytica with Mercer).
The companies may have had different owners but they were legally bound together. And, the Observer has learned, they were working together on a daily basis at the time of the referendum both companies were being paid by Mercer-funded organisations to work on Ted Cruzs presidential campaign in America. What is more, several anonymous sources reveal the two companies, working on two separate British Leave campaigns, actually shared the same database at the time.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,965 posts)Additionally, the Russians influenced the vote because a weakened European Union is better for Russia.
Further, the BrExit side has admitted they lied through their teeth.
Three strikes against it. So redo it. It was badly flawed. "Nobody" wants the exit, except for a minority consisting in significant part of ideologue hard-liners including racists and isolationists. The people who would be most negatively affected over decades by BrExit would be the young voters and they don't want it, though some got duped into voting for it the first time.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,488 posts)if Russian assets that flooded the British public on social media had access to those data bases.
I hope the UK has an equivalent to our Robert Mueller!