Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 03:34 PM Aug 2012

Romney-Ryan would target federal workers

Source: CNNMoney

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Federal workers' jobs will be under fire if Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan win November's election.

Both Romney and Ryan have made it clear that they think federal workers are one reason the nation's deficit is too high, and have talked about shrinking payrolls and cutting benefits.

In stump speeches, Romney says he wants to cut the federal workforce to "stop the unfairness of government workers getting better pay and benefits than the taxpayers they serve." Ryan, a House Republican picked this weekend to be Romney's running mate, has a detailed budget plan that targets federal workers.

Unions, in particular, say they're concerned about Ryan, saying he has a record of "undermining" federal workers.
"Rep. Ryan's budget resolution showed a significant lack of understanding and appreciation for the important role federal workers have in protecting our borders, safeguarding our food and medicines, protecting consumers in financial markets, and providing so many other vital services to our nation," said Colleen M. Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union.

Read more: http://money.cnn.com/2012/08/13/news/economy/romney-ryan-federal-workers/index.html

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney-Ryan would target federal workers (Original Post) maddezmom Aug 2012 OP
Ryan has been feeding from the public trough for years with LibDemAlways Aug 2012 #1
And where exactly were these people while G.W. Bush ran things? sinkingfeeling Aug 2012 #2
Federal workers wake up ...they are coming for you now lovuian Aug 2012 #3
WRONG!! I know of no federal employees who vote Republican, other than some in the Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2012 #18
I retired from the federal civil service with 32 years service and in the department I served byeya Aug 2012 #24
You speak of the Department that you served, but that doesn't mean that ALL departments are the same Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2012 #28
And the Border Patrol ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2012 #27
I work at HUD. Not true at all. I'm sure there are a few Republicans throughout federal government Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2012 #29
There are lots of federal employees who vote Rethuglican. Drahthaardogs Aug 2012 #39
I don't understand what th e point is. I never denied that there are Republicans. Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2012 #42
Aaaaaaand Virginia moves into the Obama column KamaAina Aug 2012 #4
+1 (nt) JaneQPublic Aug 2012 #6
Yep! All those federal employees who live in Virginia will be in for a rude awakening, however... Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2012 #21
As I alluded to above ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2012 #30
Though I understand what you're saying, I still disagree if you're trying to convince me that there Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2012 #34
Nope ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2012 #35
OK, start with congress and the Oval office. /nt Ash_F Aug 2012 #5
You mean targeting MILITARY? SoapBox Aug 2012 #7
yes, actually Enrique Aug 2012 #11
wow...never thought of that actually... SoapBox Aug 2012 #20
The money they don't want to jeopardize is the money that annabanana Aug 2012 #47
There will BE no federal workers if these people get their way. kestrel91316 Aug 2012 #8
To understand this, the ellipsis is helpful Trillo Aug 2012 #9
this would depress private sector wages of course Enrique Aug 2012 #10
When I began working for the feds in 1980, the benefits were about average for workers in largeb mysuzuki2 Aug 2012 #12
I make that argument frequently ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2012 #31
Congress member are federal workers. Skidmore Aug 2012 #13
Let him name which department of workers he wants cut LynnTTT Aug 2012 #14
Isn't Ryan a govt worker? And isn't the Federal workforce MUCH lower than under Bush?? progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #15
Federal workforce IS smaller.. and getting smaller faster and annabanana Aug 2012 #48
There are less Federal workers now than during the Eisenhower administration CanonRay Aug 2012 #16
This is absolutely outrageous! Bertha Venation Aug 2012 #17
What bothers me is the twin-pronged approach of the 'cans. CBHagman Aug 2012 #40
I'm seeing some of that sentiment in this very thread. It seems that there are folks even Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2012 #43
This lie that federal workers make more than their private sector counterparts shawn703 Aug 2012 #19
Not only more minimum-wage jobs in the Private Sector ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2012 #32
They have to have an enemy--why don't they Kingofalldems Aug 2012 #22
The days of the "overpaid" federal worker are over. Drahthaardogs Aug 2012 #23
Well, Ryan is a "Federal worker" Anyway, I think this will place VA in the blue column. nt nanabugg Aug 2012 #25
But even in those few blue-collar Federal jobs ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2012 #33
You're so right about this. The lower grade workers who barely making it. Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2012 #44
Since April 2012 ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2012 #26
They want a repeat of the Wisconsin attack on workers Kingofalldems Aug 2012 #36
Yep and they want Privatization so they can outsource lovuian Aug 2012 #37
Isn't Secret Service a federal agency? Earth_First Aug 2012 #38
Let me fix that headline: blkmusclmachine Aug 2012 #41
I have two Masters Degrees and a Doctorate. I'm definitely not overpaid and have student loans Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2012 #45
"Stop the unfairness of government workers getting better pay and benefits"? primavera Aug 2012 #46

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
1. Ryan has been feeding from the public trough for years with
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 03:37 PM
Aug 2012

excellent taxpayer paid benefits and a generous retirement plan. I assume he has no interest in cutting Congressional salaries and benefits. Self-serving hypocrite.

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
3. Federal workers wake up ...they are coming for you now
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 03:41 PM
Aug 2012

It was Ok when they slashed our pensions and medical care and Unions
and it was probably many Federal workers who voted Republican

but now they come for you
because you are a UNION

I see in the crystal ball that you will join us in the Social Security and Medicare and OBAMA care
and welcome to IRA and 401Ks

Please bring the Congress in the group hug too

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
18. WRONG!! I know of no federal employees who vote Republican, other than some in the
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:57 PM
Aug 2012

Defense Department.

Please refrain from attacking federal employees. We get enough shit from Republicans and the lies that they tell that have brainwashed the minds of people like you.

We are well aware of what the Republicans are trying to do to us. No need to condescend.

We're on the same side.

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
24. I retired from the federal civil service with 32 years service and in the department I served
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 05:18 PM
Aug 2012

many, if not most, were conservatives and voted Republican. This was mainly a land management department and there were Republicans galore.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
28. You speak of the Department that you served, but that doesn't mean that ALL departments are the same
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 07:14 PM
Aug 2012

Don't demonized federal employees.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
27. And the Border Patrol ...
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 07:00 PM
Aug 2012

And DHS and Federal Law Enforcement ... and more than a few sprinkled throughout the federal system, including the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department and HUD.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
29. I work at HUD. Not true at all. I'm sure there are a few Republicans throughout federal government
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 07:15 PM
Aug 2012

But I can't agree that there is a sizeable number outside of Defense.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
42. I don't understand what th e point is. I never denied that there are Republicans.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 08:25 AM
Aug 2012

Trust me, I know they're are. But I get the sense that this rush to promote the idea that the Federal government is overun by Republicans is being used as an excuse to demonize Federal workers, and I will not sit by and let that happen.

As I wrote upthread, I am well aware of the presense of Republicans. Sure there are. Does that mean that ALL Federal workers should be punished and targeted?

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
21. Yep! All those federal employees who live in Virginia will be in for a rude awakening, however...
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:59 PM
Aug 2012

Many of them are Defense employees. They won't be touched. Only the federal employees like me--who work at HUD--and especially who work on behalf of the poor and downtrodden....

WE will be the targets of Romney-Ryan.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
30. As I alluded to above ...
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 07:17 PM
Aug 2012

I know of more than a few gop voting conservatives in, both, HUD and the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department.

I was part of a team that gave a training for HUD employees (maybe 20 years ago ... right after C. Thomas was appointed to the SCOTUS), As a warm up exercise my team did the old, "If you could invite any two people, living or dead, to dinner, who would you choose and why?" exercise.

After the group responded, someone asked who I would invite. My completely inappropriate response was: "Clarence Thomas because I want to see if that guy is for real ... and if so, my second choice would be the grand-dragoon of the kkk; so Brother Thomas can discover that he is not the only one with a robe."

One of the Training Evaluations specifically took issue with my comment (and I suspose they should have).

On another occasion, I was sitting in a DC watering-hole that is frequented by attorneys that work the hill. I could help overhear a conversation between 2 G-Town grads (from what I could gather, they were about a year out of school). The one was working for one of the Big Boy firms ... sorting paperclips and running briefs/filings to court. The other seemed to be on his way out of his second job. But all was not lost ... his girlfriend's father knew someone that knew an under-secretary that had arranged an interview for this guy that was a sure thing, if he didn't "step on his d!ck." I thought "Okay ... DC is a 'know-someone'" kinda town." Then the guy said, "It's should be okay ... even if it is with the Civil Rights Division at the DOJ."

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
34. Though I understand what you're saying, I still disagree if you're trying to convince me that there
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 07:30 PM
Aug 2012

is a large number of Republicans who work for the federal government.

What could have happened is that those Republicans who remain in government were political appointees and burrowed into the agency.

So, we do have a number of Republicans in HUD who became full employees after the Republican administrations ended.

For instance, I know for a fact that there are quite a few Republicans in the Civil Rights Division at Justice and a few other departments because they burrowed in from the Reagan, Bush I and Bush II administrations. And because we haven't had too many Democratic presidents, I could definitely see that being the case. There aren't as many Carter administration personnel left. And there are Clinton appointees who worked at HUD, left when Bush came, then came back when Obama was elected.

So, again, I see what you're saying. However, if you're trying to convince me that there are a great number of Republicans in federal government, you're going to have to do a better job than that.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
7. You mean targeting MILITARY?
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 03:54 PM
Aug 2012

Hell, aren't they "government workers"?

And, since you RushThugs love the "Top - Down" bullshit so much...start with your own F*ing offices, perks and benefits!

Assholes.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
11. yes, actually
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:09 PM
Aug 2012

they want to spend money on defense, but they have no interest in spending it on wages. I could easily see them privatizing as much of the military as they can manage.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
20. wow...never thought of that actually...
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:58 PM
Aug 2012

They contract out the "workers / soldiers" (maybe to some foreign country...hey, let the former Black Water guy get us our military staff for cheap!) BUT they feed billions and billions to the "defense contrators" to continue making cars, tanks, planes and $1,000 hammers.

The scum at the top get even richer and the rest get nothing.

Oh ya...The 1% vs. the 99%.

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
9. To understand this, the ellipsis is helpful
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:03 PM
Aug 2012

"stop the unfairness of ... workers getting better pay and benefits...."

mysuzuki2

(3,521 posts)
12. When I began working for the feds in 1980, the benefits were about average for workers in largeb
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:11 PM
Aug 2012

organizations and corporations. The pay was about 25% less. My dad was a mid level white collar guy for Gillette. He got significantly better benefits and pay that I did. What has happened in the last 30+ years is that private sector workers have seen their pay shrink and their benefits chipped away one by one. It isn't that the feds get too much, it is that everyone else gets too little. Now they are coming for the fed workers. They won't be happy until we are all earning minimum wage with no unions or benefits. This whole process started with Reagan and will be continued full force if Rmoney and bat boy Ryan are elected.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
31. I make that argument frequently ...
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 07:21 PM
Aug 2012

saying how does trying to pull someone else into the mud benefit you? Wouldn't it be better for you to reach out to the guy on dry land so that he can pull you out of the mud?

LynnTTT

(362 posts)
14. Let him name which department of workers he wants cut
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:25 PM
Aug 2012

My Dad was with the Veterans Administration before WWII and then Social Security till he retired. He was a disability consultant, deciding who was eligible for SSD benefits. So let's just approve every applicant.
My father-in-law was in the FBI. Let's not follow up on any bank robberies.
Food Inspections, border control, transportation specialists, CIA, contagious disease researchers, etc.
Tell us Mitt, what federal workers can we do without?

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
15. Isn't Ryan a govt worker? And isn't the Federal workforce MUCH lower than under Bush??
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:33 PM
Aug 2012

God.. they're just like that OTHER shithead in Wisconsin.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
48. Federal workforce IS smaller.. and getting smaller faster and
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 09:50 AM
Aug 2012

depressing the economy in the process. There has been a HIRING FREEZE system wide for the past 3 years.

CanonRay

(14,101 posts)
16. There are less Federal workers now than during the Eisenhower administration
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:45 PM
Aug 2012

Take out the Defense Department and associates (DIA, CIA, Homeland Security, etc etc ad nauseum) and there are even fewer. This is a bullshit issue.

Honest and effective civil service is one thing that keeps us from being a banana republic.

Bertha Venation

(21,484 posts)
17. This is absolutely outrageous!
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:53 PM
Aug 2012

Mrs. V. is going to be furious when she reads this.

Does anyone know how much an IT specialist with 28 years' experience would earn in the private sector? This is what Mrs. V. does for the federal government. She's been placed at the cutting edge of every new technology that's come along since she was first told to sit down at a (machine name escapes me but it was that long ago) and told "learn it."

I'd like to be able to refute "the unfairness of government workers getting better pay and benefits than the taxpayers they serve."

CBHagman

(16,984 posts)
40. What bothers me is the twin-pronged approach of the 'cans.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 10:47 PM
Aug 2012

The Republicans seem to be banking on the notion that they can foment resentment towards supposedly well-compensated federal employees with good, solid benefits and get away with leaving those employees worse off. Very cynical.

Of course harming federal employees will not help the rest of it, and moreover the Republicans are all about emboldening the bastards who want to get away with paying as little as possible to any employee, public or private sector.

What was it Barbara Ehrenreich said her father used to say? That he could spot a phony because a phony would preach hard work and pay for it in nickels and dimes?

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
43. I'm seeing some of that sentiment in this very thread. It seems that there are folks even
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 08:27 AM
Aug 2012

here at DU who are buying into the rhetoric.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
19. This lie that federal workers make more than their private sector counterparts
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 04:58 PM
Aug 2012

Is based on compensation of the average government worker compared to the average private sector worker. What they never mention is how the average education and experience levels of government workers are higher than those of private sector workers. There are more minimum wage positions in the private sector bringing the average down. When it comes to comparing salaries for similar positions, the private sector has an advantage. I've looked at federal government jobs in my industry (IT), and they aren't comparable in compensation to what I can earn in the private sector. Compare Obama's salary to the average CEO salary too.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
32. Not only more minimum-wage jobs in the Private Sector ...
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 07:26 PM
Aug 2012

but the studies don't look at FTEs ... so the part-time employee's salary is counted as a full-time salary.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
23. The days of the "overpaid" federal worker are over.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 05:12 PM
Aug 2012

The blue collar workers were paid more when compared to their private counterparts. The white collar workers have always been paid less. This is substantiated by several studies. Unfortunately, there are few blue collar federal jobs left. Ah, the race to the bottom. It is wonderful.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
33. But even in those few blue-collar Federal jobs ...
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 07:28 PM
Aug 2012

those several studies fail to account for length of service and education.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
44. You're so right about this. The lower grade workers who barely making it.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 08:31 AM
Aug 2012

Plus, they've been most affected by cuts in COLA benefits. It matters most when considering how expensive it is to live in the D.C./MD/VA metropolitan area.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
26. Since April 2012 ...
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 06:56 PM
Aug 2012

whenever I come across the "Over-paid/Over-Benefitted Public Employee" narrative, I refer the mis-informed commentator to this study:

The data analysis presented in Figure 1 indicates that Arizona public employees, both state and local government employees, are not overpaid. Comparisons controlling for education, experience, hours of work, organizational size, gender, race, ethnicity, citizenship, and disability reveal that public employees in both state and local governments earn less than comparable private sector employees. On an annual basis, full-time Arizona state and local employees are under-compensated by 7.8 percent in comparison to otherwise similar private sector workers. When comparisons are made for difference in annual hours worked, full-time Arizona state and local employees are under-compensated by a smaller 6.0 percent.

These results sharply contrast with the analysis presented by the Goldwater Institute in their January 24 2012 policy report, which suggests that public unions caused Arizona state and local government worker compensation to be $560 million above market rate. [3] Their analysis is inaccurate due to poor methodology.


https://grandcanyoninstitute.org/research


As the study points to the flaw in every study that supports their narrative.

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
37. Yep and they want Privatization so they can outsource
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 09:42 PM
Aug 2012

the jobs so they can do nothing and get millions of tax dollars

I'm not against Federal Workers and I'm sure the Democrat Federal Workers know the scoop

but Republican Fed Workers get a good hard look at your party....because they come for you
like they came for us


They are licking their chops at the Civil Service Pensions ....and licking their chops at Social Security


the money has to come from the people ....not the corporations

that is the Republican Way

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
45. I have two Masters Degrees and a Doctorate. I'm definitely not overpaid and have student loans
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 08:33 AM
Aug 2012

to show for it. Plus, the cost of living in the D.C. metropolitan area is not low.

The demonization of federal workers--regardless of political affiliation--needs to stop!

primavera

(5,191 posts)
46. "Stop the unfairness of government workers getting better pay and benefits"?
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 08:57 AM
Aug 2012

I wonder in which of his platinum Rolls Royces he was sitting when he said this. Pardon me while I fall off my chair laughing.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Romney-Ryan would target ...