Sex to boost film career is 'not rape': Harvey Weinstein lawyer
Source: Times of India
AFP | Mar 3, 2018, 17:46 IST
LONDON: Harvey Weinstein's lawyer said on Saturday a woman having sex with a Hollywood producer to advance her career is "not rape", in a British newspaper interview on the eve of the Oscars.
Ben Brafman is one of the US' top criminal defence attorneys, hired by the disgraced Hollywood mogul whose career is in tatters following accusations of sexual harassment, assault and rape.
More than 100 women have accused Weinstein of impropriety going back 40 years, but Brafman argued there was no criminal behaviour.
"If a woman decides that she needs to have sex with a Hollywood producer to advance her career and actually does it and finds the whole thing offensive, that's not rape," he told The Times.
Read more: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/sex-to-boost-film-career-is-not-rape-harvey-weinstein-lawyer/articleshow/63148088.cms
safeinOhio
(32,656 posts)marble falls
(57,055 posts)and if he had asked for an off the books payment from her it wouldn't have been extortion.
I think Harvey needs a better lawyer.
Canoe52
(2,948 posts)MissMillie
(38,545 posts)A sister?
In theory he has a mother.... but then again he could just be a slug that crawled out from under a rock.
(on edit: turns out he has 4 daughters)
infullview
(978 posts)Weinstein coupled his sexual advances with an implicit threat of being blacklisted if you didn't comply which makes this rape and extortion.
forgotmylogin
(7,522 posts)It implies that one must degrade themselves sexually to be competitive in the business.
It implies he is "reaping the inherent benefits" of his status and power whether his victims were compliant or not.
It is technically cheating someone else out of a job.
Solly Mack
(90,761 posts)meadowlander
(4,393 posts)Oh wait... using a power differential to coerce someone into sex means you didn't actually get consent which is...
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Has power over the other. Is this law too?
Skittles
(153,138 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)and she needed the job to support her 3 kids, I could get away with telling her part of the job was giving me a blow job, and if she was desperate enough for the money, to do that, it would be okay because she consented to the agreement. I just don't think it works that way. I think if I were a person like that, I would be in a lot of trouble.
rocktivity
(44,573 posts)Last edited Thu Jun 24, 2021, 11:14 AM - Edit history (1)
Sexual harassment, sexual assault, domestic terrorism, extortion, harassment, intimidation, conspiracy, pandering, collusion and racketeering will do.
rocktivity