GOP Platform Draft Strongly Defends “Traditional Concept Of Marriage” [written by Perkins of FRC]
Source: BuzzFeed
Attacks Obama administration for failing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act.
TAMPA, Florida The Republican Party platform will strongly oppose the Obama administration's decision not to defend the Defense of Marriage Act, the federal law that bars recognition of same-sex couples' marriages, in court and will support "a constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman," according to the draft platform language approved by subcommittees today.
¬snip¬
Although the Log Cabin Republicans had pointed to language about "respect and dignity" earlier in the day, Family Research Council president Tony Perkins told BuzzFeed: You should read the entire plank on marriage, which I wrote. I feel very happy about it. I feel pretty optimistic about the outcome here.
¬snip¬
"We oppose the Administration's open defiance of this principle [of separation of powers] in its handling of immigration cases, in federal personnel benefits, in allowing a same-sex marriage at a military base, and in refusing to defend DOMA in the courts," the draft states.
Finally, after praising the benefits of marriage, the draft documents state, "[W]e believe that marriage, the union of one man and one woman must be upheld as the national standard, a goal to stand for, encourage, and promote through laws governing marriage."
Read more: http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/exclusive-gop-platform-draft-strongly-defends-tr
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)the State of TX does not even recognize their marriage. At least that is what the TX constitution now says.
brutus smith
(685 posts)The GOP platform: Hi, my name is Ben Dover.
_Liann_
(377 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,265 posts)Head of the FRC, a designated hate group? The Republicans allow hate groups to write their platform?
OK, I'm not surprised. But it's still disgusting.
bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)the traditional definition of rape.
Permanut
(5,560 posts)If you're going to base your platform on the demands of one religion, why not put all of it in? I don't think God appreciates half hearted efforts.
So, for example, in Ephesians 5, we find that "you wives must submit to your husbands in everything." Let's have a plank for that.
Also, in 1 Timothy, we find "But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet", so that would affect Bachmann, Palin, Coulter, Brewer, Malkin, et al.
Also in 1 Timothy, we find that the gold and pearls have got to go. Gotta have all the planks in there to conform to our laws that come directly from the hand of God, so to speak. I think God has hands, but that's a whole nother post.
That's a start; go ahead and work on the rest of it, Tony.
K&R
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)That's like strongly defending a healthy diet with a trip to Crispy Creme.
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)oldsarge54
(582 posts)He is indeed taking a lot of stick for the various legal challenges and suits. Instead of a law suit, I think with luck he's aiming at all out repeal in a happier 113th Congress. Defense of marriage act anyway! I don't feel my marraige is threatened by gay marriage. Maybe Republicans have an unhappy fear of their ole lady dashing off with another lady.
bushisanidiot
(8,064 posts)what idiots. they have no idea how much the u.s. populations despises their rhetoric. they'll find out in november.